[sc_embed_player fileurl=”http://inewsource.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Mello-Signs.mp3″]To listen to this story as heard on KPBS radio, hit play.
[/box]
Mello-Roos taxes, paid by homeowners in new developments, are a virtual ATM for the Poway Unified School District. The District has accumulated so much surplus in these special taxes it spends some of the money in neighborhoods that pay no Mello-Roos at all.
The district pays for everything from a garbage disposal to catered lunches to a $49,000 three-day planning meeting. It even bought a multi-million dollar administration building and furnished it using Mello-Roos money.
There is no legal limit and no standardized formula for calculating Mello-Roos Taxes. In some cases, the formulas are so convoluted that homeowners have virtually no way of knowing whether they’re paying the correct amount.
What’s more there is no state oversight over the funds: at a minimum, the system is far from transparent to those who are footing the bill. Some are asking whether it’s even legal.
“We’re not going to engender support for our schools from the broader community if we’re misusing their funds,” Poway school board member Kimberley Beatty told inewsource.
by Joanne Faryon | inewsource
When Mike Smith and his wife bought a house in an upscale San Diego suburb seven years ago, they were planning to start a family.
Smith agreed to pay an extra $4,140 on top of his regular tax bill every year to pay for the roads and parks in his neighborhood and most importantly, the promise of a new school in the acclaimed Poway Unified School District. He was happy to know he and his wife could walk their child just a block to class.
This summer, Smith was ready to cash in on his investment. His daughter is five years old and entering kindergarten. But he and 55 other families were told in May there wasn’t room. They were diverted to a much older school, in need of repair. “It’s not what we were signing up for,” Smith said.
And, the school is nearly five miles away from his home.
Smith’s extra taxes, called Mello-Roos, were signed into law in 1982 as a way for developers to pass on the costs of infrastructure in new neighborhoods to property owners. They create mini-governments called Community Facilities Districts or CFDs that are administered by cities or school districts. The premise is that growth should pay for growth.
The CFD can issue tax-exempt municipal bonds and pass the debt costs onto property owners in the form of Mello-Roos taxes. They can range from less than $100 a year to more than $10,000. In return for paying these special taxes, the property owners have fresh roads and state-of-the-art schools.
How the Poway district is able to renege on its deal with Mike Smith and the other families is a question not easily answered because figuring out where Mike Smith’s money is spent is like disassembling a pyramid one stone at a time.
inewsource spent months combing through financial documents, reviewing bond statements to the Securities and Exchange Commission, pouring over reams of tax data and bills paid with Mello-Roos money to discover a labyrinthian system that brings in so much money it has accumulated $168 million in cash in more than 200 bank accounts.
Because bonds finance other bonds and funds are combined in accounts, it is almost impossible to follow the money.
When two inewsource reporters sat down with Poway district officials last year to learn about how Mello-Roos helps pay for schools in new neighborhoods, superintendent John Collins said the taxes could be used for buildings, school buses, even computers, anything that had a lifespan of five or more years.
What inewsource found, however, were invoices for hundreds of miscellaneous expenses related to repairing, upgrading, and furnishing district offices and schools inside and outside of Mello-Roos communities.
Both Poway superintendent John Collins and Marc Davis, the president of the school board, who chose to be interviewed together, defended how much they collect in Mello-Roos taxes and the way the funds are spent.
Parents love Poway schools and they don’t complain about their taxes, Davis said.
“In fact, we have people flooding to our community. We have high quality schools, high quality infrastructure, high quality facilities, and parents come here because they love the area,” he said. “And so if this was an issue I think we would hear some blowback from our people and I just don’t hear it.”
Taking from Mello-Roos
The name can be deceiving. The Poway Unified School District stretches 100 square miles in the center of the county, encompassing the city of Poway, and several neighborhoods in the city of San Diego. In fact 26 of its 37 schools are in San Diego.
The district has a great academic record – with all of its schools exceeding state standards. Its financial record suffered a major blow after it used a capital appreciation bond to finance $100 million in school renovations, a financing scheme that will end up costing taxpayers $1 billion dollars. Voters approved the renovations in a bond measure, Prop C, in 2008.
Voters also approved Prop U in 2002, allowing the district to borrow nearly $200 million to upgrade older schools.
The improvements included new heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems, according to a presentation by Collins at a school board meeting last year. In that same presentation Collins told board members the renovations were complete.
But just four months ago, the school board approved spending $16.5 million of Mello-Roos funds to upgrade the HVAC systems at Rancho Bernardo and Mt. Carmel High Schools, the same schools that were supposed to have already been upgraded with Prop U and Prop C funds.
Kimberley Beatty, a former DEA special agent and law school graduate, was elected to the Poway School Board last November.
As a homeowner in Sabre Springs who pays Mello-Roos taxes, she wondered whether it was even legal to take taxes earmarked for new facilities and spend it on older schools. And why the district hadn’t been able to renovate the schools with the previous bond funds.
Beatty said she was told the district ran out of money and couldn’t renovate all the schools on its list. And, she was told, it was legal to use surplus Mello-Roos funds on the older schools.
“I voted for that agenda item, but pretty soon after I regretted my vote because it just seemed inherently wrong,” she told inewsource.
“You had new communities that were not only set up to pay for their own infrastructure development but also for redevelopment in the older communities and that was why I started questioning this action.”
Beatty wrote to the superintendent to ask for a written legal opinion from district lawyers. She received it a few days ago, three months after the request. But she said most of her questions were not addressed.
The HVAC systems weren’t the only upgrades made at older schools with Mello-Roos funds.
The district also spent more than $466,500 on new computers for Mount Carmel High School last July, according to invoices.
It spent $9.5 million on its new administration building, hundreds of thousands more on furnishing it, and $6,500 on a CAFE sign on the exterior, from Mello-Roos funds. The total cost of the building and the improvements were paid for by homeowners who live in CFDs. Their children make up just 40 percent of the student population.
Surplus taxes are for everyone
The Poway school district collects Mello Roos taxes in 14 different community facilities districts (a 15th was recently formed) for new schools. In some of those communities, it also collects Mello-Roos taxes to pay for roads, sewers, and fire stations – infrastructure separate from the schools.
That’s usually the role of cities, but in 2006, when a large section of the Poway district was being developed, the city of San Diego’s credit rating had taken a nose dive because of its pension obligations. So the developer asked the school district to go the bond market on its behalf to pay for infrastructure and then pass that debt on to homeowners through Mello-Roos taxes.
Collins said the district only uses the “surplus” taxes generated from those “improvement” areas in the non-Mello-Roos schools.
And that distinction, Collins and school board president Marc Davis said, make it legal.
“The value that comes to us in providing that service to the developer, is that over time those CFDs, (Mello-Roos districts) those infrastructure CFDs will build up surplus special taxes we are then able to use for other district wide purposes,” Davis said.
Bond Lunch Money
On Sept. 29, 2011, the Poway Unified School district hosted a three-day design symposium at their administration building to talk about the new $82 million, K- 8 school it was building near Black Mountain in the northeastern section of the city of San Diego. About 100 people attended, among them architects, the developer, parents, students, and school board members, according to board president Davis.
The event, paid for with Mello-Roos funds, cost $48,725.
Breakfast, lunch, and snacks were served over the three days. The catering bill came to $2,443.04.
The district paid for the event and the meals using Mello-Roos funds generated in a neighborhood a couple miles away. Homeowners there are scheduled to pay an average of $2,600 every year in extra taxes for the next three decades.
“These people were here for three consistent days for eight hours each day for the purpose of designing this, what’s going to be an incredible school in the 4S Ranch area,” Davis said in defense of the expense.
It wasn’t the only catering bill the district paid with Mello-Roos funds. inewsource obtained invoices from The Catering Group between January 2010 and and June 30, 2013. The district spent $3,524 in Mello-Roos funds on lunches during meetings, interviews, and an “event” where ice cream sundaes were on the menu.
There are provisions in the law for “administration,” but even one of the district’s own financial advisors paused when considering whether a catering bill could be an allowable expense under the Mello-Roos law.
“Lunch I don’t know, this is like a legal question,” Steven Gald, senior director at Dolinka Group said. Dolinka is paid by the district to administer Mello Roos funds.
The district also paid a real estate consultant more than $101,446 from Mello-Roos funds, which included $989 in meals, between January 2010 and July 2012, according to invoices inewsource reviewed.
Many of the hours he charged the district were for meetings unrelated to Mello-Roos communities.
Collins said the general fund will reimburse the Mello-Roos accounts for the charges at the end of the year.
“We always do a reimbursement from the general fund for any expenses that were really not tied to the CFDs,” he said.
“I’d like my money back please”
A small group of parents met at a park in the Torrey Del Mar area a week ago to introduce their kids and to strategize about tonight’s school board meeting.
The kids, all first born, start kindergarten this week, and they’ll be going to the same school, Adobe Bluffs Elementary, miles from where some of them live. They are among the 55 families who, along with Mike Smith, were told there is no room for them at one of the district’s newest schools, Willow Grove Elementary.
All of the parents at the park pay Mello-Roos and believed their children could attend the new school.
“We’ve paid it for 8 years now, and we’re just now getting our first kid into kindergarten,” Mike Eagan said.
Jenny Duncan, whose daughter was looking forward to starting school with her friends, said Adobe Bluffs “is not equitable in any way to the school they’re being sent from.”
Willow Grove is five years old, has an artificial turf field, interactive garden, an outdoor amphitheater and a computer lab with 30 workstations. Adobe Bluffs is 21 years old. In June, the school board approved spending $728,000 in Mello-Roos funds to upgrade the bathrooms and the exterior of the building.
The Mello-Roos act says families who pay special taxes that helped pay for a new school should get priority in attending that school, but how much priority they get depends on how much of their taxes paid for the facility.
Given the district’s complex financing system and the general language used in describing school facilities in CFD and bond documents, the average homeowner doesn’t stand a chance of tracking her special tax dollars.
Collins, the superintendent, said all the families whose children made it into the kindergarten class at Willow Grove are paying Mello-Roos taxes.
“They all have preference, but when it’s full it’s full,” he said.
Duncan, Smith and other parents asked district officials at the June board meeting why they couldn’t provide relocatable classrooms at Willow Grove for their kids. Several of Poway’s schools use these classrooms in expanding neighborhoods.
“It’s over $100,000 to move one on and off, and it was the decision of staff not to do that at this time, ”Collins told parents at the meeting.
In an interview with inewsource, Collins said he never said the district couldn’t afford the extra classrooms.
“We can order one now and it will be there in January. By then these kids will be settled in Adobe Bluffs … and nobody’s going to want to move, and I don’t know that its worth that effort,” Collins said.
Duncan and the other parents were surprised to learn from inewsource the district has surplus Mello-Roos funds. Some were especially bothered to hear the district spent more than $6,000 on a Cafe sign.
“I’’d like my money back, please, because my husband and I work a lot of hours to provide for our children. I’d like my money back if they’re not going to use it appropriately,” she said.
There is no state oversight of Mello-Roos funds. Local governments have to report bond activity and expenditures to the state treasurer, but that office has no responsibility to question what is reported.
Ultimately, the school boards and city councils, which enter into agreements with developers to form Community Facilities Districts, are accountable for the funds, to the taxpayer and the bond market.
Beatty said she takes that job seriously and so has been researching the Mello-Roos act.
Asked whether she thinks the district is spending Mello-Roos funds illegally, she paused.
“I don’t want to conjecture and that is why I would like a legal opinion from an attorney or … perhaps from the head lawyer of the state (attorney general) to explain to communities, to school boards, to cities, municipalities, what the allowable uses are of Mello-Roos funds,” she said.
Collins said the district is just using the financial mechanisms the state allows to raise money for the district.
“(Is) everyone happy with every dollar spent? I’m sure they’re not. But are they happy with the quality of the outcome and the facility and the education we’re providing to the next generation? Absolutely,” he said.
Beatty takes a different view.
“No matter how happy you are that legal obligation of disclosure doesn’t go away.”
When Mike Smith learned some of the Mello-Roos funds from his community paid for the Cafe sign at the new administration building he was dumbfounded.
“That’s appalling,” he said.
Especially because the district decided not to spend the money on a relocatable classroom that could have made room for his daughter at Willow Grove, the school down her street.
She starts school in two days. And unless the school board comes up with a last-minute solution that will make room for 55 more kindergarten kids, Smith will be driving rather than walking her to school.
inewsource reporter Kelly Paice and data journalist Kevin Crowe contributed to this report
inewsource is a nonprofit, nonpartisan newsroom dedicated to improving lives in the San Diego region and beyond through impactful, data-based investigative and accountability journalism.
Our Vision
Betrayals of the public trust are revealed and rectified, wrongdoing is deterred, and inequities are illuminated thanks to inewsource’s deep, dogged, fact-based reporting.
Our Values
Truth: Above all else, we value the importance of a free and credible press. Truth is the cornerstone of democracy and the core value for inewsource.
Transparency: We build trust with our readers by adhering to the highest standards and ethics, and to reporting with facts, precision and context.
Collaboration: Our newsroom prioritizes collaboration over competition. We regularly partner with media outlets on reporting projects and to share content.
Community: Our reporting serves the San Diego region, and we strive to build relationships with our audience by getting out into the community to listen and engage.
Ethics Policy
inewsource will conduct its business with the highest standards of decency, fairness and accuracy. These standards shall apply equally to inewsource employees, freelancers and all others engaged in gathering information on behalf of inewsource. All receive a copy of these ethical standards.
In the course of our reporting, we will consistently:
● Identify our organization and ourselves fully and avoid false representations of any kind to any source.
● Obtain consent from all parties before electronically recording any interview or conversation except in extraordinary cases authorized by the Managing Editor and Editor. If a source refuses to be taped, that must be honored; no recordings are to be made without consent.
● Respect the individual’s right to privacy. inewsource will never manipulate or barter private, personal, health, financial or other extraneous information in the course of preparing its reports.
● Any source we describe or write about in any significant manner must be contacted. The employee should document all efforts to contact the source, and if unsuccessful, should summarize these efforts at contact in the body of his/her writing.
In addition, inewsource follows the Code of Ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists. The latest version, revised in 2014, can be found here.
Our organization retains full authority over editorial content to protect the best journalistic and business interests of our organization. We will maintain a firewall between news coverage decisions and sources of all revenue. Acceptance of financial support does not constitute implied or actual endorsement of donors or their products, services or opinions.
We accept gifts, grants and sponsorships from individuals and organizations for the general support of our activities, but our news judgments are made independently and not on the basis of donor support. Our organization also may consider donations to support the coverage of particular topics, but our organization maintains editorial control of the coverage. We will cede no right of review or influence of editorial content, nor of unauthorized distribution of editorial content.
Our organization will make public all donors who give a total of $1,000 or more. We will accept anonymous donations for general support only if it is clear that sufficient safeguards have been put into place that the expenditure of that donation is made independently by our organization and in compliance with INN’s Membership Standards.
Diversity
Diverse Voices
Inclusiveness is at the heart of thinking and acting as journalists, and it supports the educational mandate of inewsource. Race, class, generation, gender, sexual orientation, ability, and geography all affect point of view. inewsource believes that reflecting societal differences in reporting leads to better, more nuanced stories and a better-informed community.
inewsource is committed to employment equity and diversity.
Diverse Staffing Report
Below is a breakdown of staffing data at inewsource. We determine the composition of our staff by asking them to self-identify. It is based on a newsroom of 11 and a total staff of 15 as of August 2020. Percentages are based on 15 total survey responses. The numbers include full-time and part-time staff, full-time fellows and full-time and part-time interns.
All Staff Percentages are based on 15 total survey responses. The numbers include full-time and part-time staff, full-time fellows and full-time and part-time interns.
Newsroom Percentages are based on 15 completed survey responses to this question.
Business Percentages are based on 15 completed survey responses to this question.
Gender Identity
Gender Identity
Gender Identity
Women
80%
Women
82%
Women
75%
Men
20%
Men
18%
Men
25%
Sexual Orientation
Sexual Orientation
Sexual Orientation
Straight
87%
Straight
82%
Straight
100%
LGBTQ-identifying
7%
LGBTQ-identifying
7%
Not specified
7%
Not specified
7%
Speak a language beyond English at home
33%
Speak a language beyond English at home
18%
Speak a language beyond English at home
75%
Race/Ethnicity
Race/Ethnicity
Race/Ethnicity
White
67%
White
73%
White
50%
Hispanic or Latinx
20%
Two or more races
18%
Hispanic or Latinx
50%
Two or more races
13%
Hispanic or Latinx
9%
Age
Age
Age
20-29
40%
20-29
45%
20-29
25%
30-39
47%
30-39
45%
30-39
50%
60 or older
13%
60 or older
9%
60 or older
25%
* The percentages in the charts have been rounded and may not add up to 100.
Ownership Structure, Funding and Grants
inewsource is a nonprofit organization, whose legal name is Investigative Newsource. It does business as inewsource. The business was incorporated on Aug. 4, 2009 in the state of California. Tax-exempt status as a 501c3 was granted by the IRS on Sept. 15, 2010. inewsource is funded primarily by individual contributions and foundation grants. We are guided by a board of directors.
Editorial independence: Journalists employed by inewsource take no editorial direction from donors whose contributions may support the organization. inewsource will not hesitate to report on its donors when events warrant. Our Editorial Independence Policy details the firewall between journalism and revenue.
To be transparent with the public, inewsourcelists its donors on its website. In cases where a donor is the subject of an inewsource story, additional disclosure will be made.
Financial Documents
We do our due diligence to earn your trust in our reporting, as well as in our governance and financial sustainability. All of our financial documents are made available to view so that our supporters can trust we are sound stewards of your philanthropy. Review our IRS Form 990s, audited financial statements and annual reports:
Transparency is one of our core values. Today, there is a need to build trust with our audience because new media and ways of communicating spread lies and slanted news faster than “real” news. At the same time, this era of new technologies makes it easier than ever for news organizations to be transparent. People don’t just have to believe us, they can investigate our investigations with our source materials.
Transparency is key to building credibility.
inewsource reporters have primary responsibility for reporting, writing, and fact-checking their stories. But before a story is published, the reporter reviews all facts and sources with an editor or another reporter. Facts must be traced to a primary source.
In addition, we “transparify” certain investigative stories. This process involves publishing a version of the web story with hyperlinks to all the story’s facts. This is proof that all facts have been documented with primary evidence. We do this to build trust with our readers and to be as transparent as we hope the public figures and institutions that we hold accountable will be.
Unnamed Sources
Not all sources are created equal. Some sources cannot speak authoritatively, provide proper analysis or speak specifically to every inquiry placed before them. To maintain the integrity of our reporting, inewsource reporters must select sources who can speak with validity to the topic at hand, and avoid presenting unqualified or underqualified sources as experts.
If an interviewed source has a conflict of interest, or whose qualifications may be tangential or limited, reporters will note that within the context of the story.
It is incumbent upon reporters to fully background their sources to uncover conflicts of interest or slant prior to using them in a story.
Unless discussed prior to an interview, all subjects talking to inewsource journalists are on the record. Specifically, the source is identified by name and title, and their exact or paraphrased words are attributed to them for publication. If journalists speak with sources who are not politicians, public figures or those not commonly interviewed by journalists, staff should explain clearly that information discussed will be on the record and for publication.
There are times, however, when information may be critical for a story but cannot be found or verified by other means. For example, a source may be able to confirm specific information about a series of events they may have witnessed, but have legitimate concerns about using their name or title. The repercussions to the source could be legal, job-related retribution or personal safety. The source and journalist must discuss these potential dangers and terms of use should be agreed upon by both parties.
If inewsource publishes information from an anonymous source, inewsource will explain to readers, in as much detail as possible, why we agreed to anonymity.
Corrections and Clarifications
inewsource strives for accuracy in everything we do, which is why we are committed to fact checking our content. But sometimes we make errors. When that happens, we correct them. We also clarify stories when something we’ve written is confusing or could be misinterpreted.
We endeavor to always be transparent about our commitment to correcting errors and clarifying misperceptions. When staffers see, hear or read about a possible issue with the accuracy of any inewsource content, they are expected to bring it to the attention of an editor and the web producer so it can be evaluated to determine how to proceed.
Including the web producer is key because inewsource is a multimedia news organization and shares its content with multiple partners on multiple platforms. The web producer must alert these partners about corrections and clarifications.
Corrections and clarifications should be included at the bottom of stories and dated.
Actionable Feedback and Newsroom Contacts
Our audiences know the region we cover and have a stake in maintaining and improving the quality of life in San Diego and Imperial counties. We know your knowledge and insights can help shape what we cover and how we cover it. We invite your comments and complaints on news stories, suggestions for issues to cover or sources to consult. We rely on you to tell us when we get it right and when we need to keep pushing.
Your comments, questions and suggestions can be sent to the team as a whole at contact@inewsource.org or you can contact a specific member of our staff.
Lorie Hearn is the chief executive officer, editor and founder of inewsource. She founded inewsource in the summer of 2009, following a successful reporting and editing career in newspapers. She retired from The San Diego Union-Tribune, where she had been a reporter, Metro Editor and finally the senior editor for Metro and Watchdog Journalism. In addition to department oversight, Hearn personally managed a four-person watchdog team, composed of two data specialists and two investigative reporters. Hearn was a Nieman Foundation fellow at Harvard University in 1994-95. She focused on juvenile justice and drug control policy, a natural course to follow her years as a courts and legal affairs reporter at the San Diego Union and then the Union-Tribune.
Hearn became Metro Editor in 1999 and oversaw regional and city news coverage, which included the city of San Diego’s financial debacle and near bankruptcy. Reporters and editors on Metro during her tenure were part of the Pulitzer Prize-winning stories that exposed Congressman Randy “Duke” Cunningham and led to his imprisonment.
Hearn began her journalism career as a reporter for the Bucks County Courier Times, a small daily outside of Philadelphia, shortly after graduating from the University of Delaware. During the decades following, she moved through countless beats at five newspapers on both coasts.
High-profile coverage included the historic state Supreme Court election in 1986, when three sitting justices were ousted from the bench, and the 1992 execution of Robert Alton Harris. That gas chamber execution was the first time the death penalty was carried out in California in 25 years.
In her nine years as Metro Editor at the Union-Tribune, Hearn made watchdog reporting a priority. Her reporters produced award-winning investigations covering large and small local governments. The depth and breadth of their public service work was most evident in coverage of the wildfires of 2003 and then 2007, when more than half a million people were evacuated from their homes.
Laura Wingard is the managing editor at inewsource. She has been an editor in San Diego since 2002, working at The San Diego Union-Tribune, KPBS and now inewsource. At the Union-Tribune, she served in a variety of roles including as enterprise editor, government editor, public safety and legal affairs editor, and metro editor. She directed the newspaper’s award-winning coverage of the October 2007 wildfires and the 2010 disappearance of Poway teenager Chelsea King. She also oversaw reporting on San Diego’s pension crisis.
For two years, Wingard was news and digital editor at KPBS, overseeing a team of four multimedia reporters and two web producers. She also was the KPBS liaison with inewsource and collaborated with inewsource chief executive officer and editor Lorie Hearn on investigative work by both news organizations.
Wingard also worked at the Las Vegas Review-Journal as the city editor and as an award-winning reporter covering the environment and politics. She also was the assistant managing editor for metro at The Press-Enterprise in Riverside. She earned her bachelor’s degree at California State University, Fullerton, with a double major in communications/journalism and political science.
Brad Racino is the assistant editor and a senior reporter at inewsource. He has produced investigations for print, radio and TV on topics including political corruption, transportation, health, maritime, education and nonprofits.
His cross-platform reporting for inewsource has earned more than 50 awards since 2012, including back-to-back national medals from Investigative Reporters and Editors, two national Edward R. Murrow awards, a Meyer “Mike” Berger award from New York City’s Columbia Journalism School, the Sol Price Award for Responsible Journalism, San Diego SPJ’s First Amendment Award, and a national Emmy nomination.
In 2017, Racino was selected by the Institute for Nonprofit News as one of 10 “Emerging Leaders” in U.S. nonprofit journalism.
Racino has worked as a reporter and database analyst for News21; as a photographer, videographer and reporter for the Columbia Missourian; as a project coordinator for the National Freedom of Information Coalition and as a videographer and editor for Verizon Fios1 TV in New York. He received his master’s degree in journalism from the University of Missouri in 2012.
Byline Policy
Most of our articles carry a byline to identify the author. In some cases, inewsource will use a brand byline such as “Staff” or “inewsource” for internal or editorial information about the newsroom. In these instances, inewsource‘s Editor and Managing Editor are responsible for content that uses a brand byline.
The Trust Project
inewsource is proud to be a member of The Trust Project and support efforts to increase transparency in journalism by displaying the 8 Trust Indicators on our stories. We launched the Trust Indicators on Sep. 16, 2020.
Privacy Policy
inewsource has prepared this Privacy Policy to explain how we collect, use, protect, and share information when you use our inewsource.org website (the “Site“) or when you use any of our services (the “Services“).
By using the Site or Services you consent to this Privacy Policy.
Log Data
Like many site operators, we collect information that your browser sends whenever you visit our site (“Log Data”).
This Log Data may include information such as your computer’s Internet Protocol (“IP”) address, browser type, browser version, the pages of our site that you visit, the time and date of your visit, the time spent on those pages and other statistics.
Cookies
Cookies are files with small amount of data, which may include an anonymous unique identifier. Cookies are sent to your browser from a web site and stored on your computer or mobile device.
Like many sites, we use “cookies” to collect information. You can instruct your browser to refuse all cookies or to indicate when a cookie is being sent. However, if you do not accept cookies, you may not be able to use some portions of our site.
Certain pages on our site may set other third party cookies. For example, we may embed content, such as videos, from another site that sets a cookie. While we try to minimize these third party cookies, we can’t always control what cookies this third party content sets.
Additionally, we may use third party services — such as those that provide social media conveniences, measure traffic, send newsletters and facilitate donations — that may place cookies on your computer. We don’t have any way of knowing how such services handle the resulting data internally. inewsource makes no claim, nor takes liability for the insecure submission of information via these applications.
Here are the services whose cookies you can find on inewsource.org:
Sharing buttons for Facebook and Twitter. These use the standard scripts provided by each company.
Google Analytics, which we use to measure site traffic. Google Analytics gathers certain non-personally identifying information over time, such as your IP address, browser type, internet service provider, referring and exit pages, time stamp, and similar data. We also use Facebook Pixel to measure, optimize and build audiences for advertising campaigns served on Facebook. In particular it enables us to see how our users move between devices when accessing our website and Facebook, to ensure that our Facebook advertising is seen by our users most likely to be interested in such advertising by analyzing which content a user has viewed and interacted with on our website.
Stripe, which allows us to accept donations through our website.
Salesforce to manage newsletter subscriber, donor, and other identifiable user data.
Mailchimp, to manage newsletter distributions. We collect your email address if you choose to subscribe to one of our email newsletters or email news alerts. Other optional information that you enter when subscribing – such as your first and last names or city are simply so that we can deliver more personalized email newsletters. We DO NOT sell, rent or market your information to any other parties. We retain your information only as long as necessary to provide your service. When we send emails, it collects some data about which users open the emails and which links are clicked. We use this information to optimize our email newsletters and, as aggregate information, to explain what percentage of our users open and interact with our newsletters.
Personal Data
We only collect personally identifiable information such as your name and email address when you sign up for a newsletter, donate to our organization, or otherwise submit it to us voluntarily. We do not share your personal data with any third parties other than some common service providers, whose products use your information to help us improve our site, deliver newsletters, or allow us to offer donation opportunities.
inewsource limits access to all user data for the purposes of newsletter, fundraising, and customer service only. User data is not sold to or otherwise shared with anyone not working with or for the inewsource.
You may unsubscribe or opt-out of our email and mail communications at any time by hitting the “unsubscribe” button in any email you receive from inewsource, or by emailing us at contact@inewsource.org or calling us at 619-594-5100.
Donor Information
The identities of all donors will be listed on our website. inewsource does not share, trade, sell, or otherwise release donors’ personal information to any third parties.
Refunds
If you encounter errors when donating on the website, please contact us at members@inewsource.org. For example, if you submit a donation for an incorrect amount or make a duplicate transaction please email us immediately so we can reverse the charges.
Cancellation of Recurring Donations
You can cancel your monthly recurring donations free of charge by notifying us at members@inewsource.org.
Links to Other Websites
Our site may contain links to documents, resources or other websites that we think may be of interest to you. We have no control over these other sites or their content. You should be aware when you leave our site for another, and remember that other sites are governed by their own user agreements and privacy policies, which should be available to you to read.
Disclaimers and Limitation of Liability
Although we take reasonable steps to prevent the introduction of viruses, worms, “Trojan Horses” or other destructive materials to our site, we do not guarantee or warrant that our site or materials that may be downloaded from our site are free from such destructive features. We are not liable for any damages or harm attributable to such features. We are not liable for any claim, loss or injust based on errors, omissions, interruptions or other inaccuracies on our site, nor for any claim, loss or injust that results from your use of this site or your breach of any provision of this User Agreement.
Contact Us
If there are any questions regarding this privacy policy, please contact us at contact@inewsource.org or call us at 619-594-5100.