The San Diego Association of Governments knew it would have a tough task last year winning public support for its $200 billion spending plan to fund transportation needs over the next 35 years.
Four years earlier, when SANDAG approved its last transportation blueprint for the region, environmentalists panned it. They also sued the agency for not doing enough to curb greenhouse gas emissions. The environmentalists have won twice in the lower courts and the case is at the state Supreme Court.
So before the vote last fall on its latest transportation plan, SANDAG spent more than half a million dollars on outside media consultants to craft a message that said the plan balanced spending needs for roads and public transit. The money for outside consultants was in addition to more than $1 million a year in salaries for 12 SANDAG communication staff members, plus three interns.
Emails and other documents obtained by KPBS through public records requests show that the consultants and communication staff worked together to sell to the news media and the public that the new transportation blueprint was a good one and worthy of support.
Before October’s vote on the plan, SANDAG staff followed a media campaign crafted with the help of an outside public relations firm. It included a plan to pitch story ideas to reporters, including one that asked — “Is ‘Transit-First’ truly an option?”
SANDAG staffers also successfully pitched the same opinion piece to several newspapers in the county, naming different public officials and civic leaders as the authors.
Records also show that agency employees sometimes exchanged dozens of emails over multiple days on how to respond to negative tweets about SANDAG. They also made sure to coordinate SANDAG’s message about the plan with elected officials throughout the county and identified four local journalists to brief: Joshua Stewart with The San Diego Union-Tribune, Andrew Keatts with Voice of San Diego, Josh Emerson Smith, who at the time was with San Diego CityBeat, and me, Claire Trageser.
Preparing to combat critics
SANDAG updates its regional transportation plan every four years. With the controversy surrounding its previous blueprint, the agency wanted to be prepared last year for its critics — particularly the ones who take to social media to voice their opinions.
In mid-September, SANDAG Communications Manager David Hicks sent an email to staffers briefing them on a week’s worth of media operations.
DOCUMENT
SANDAG Regional Transportation Plan
“We’ll be doing Facebook posts, two or three a week, plus a fair amount on Twitter (one or two tweets a day),” he wrote. “In addition, we will be carefully monitoring conversations that are going on via social media regarding the regional plan. And we will be more proactively taking part in those conversations. We will keep our messages very positive. We won’t get into extensive, negative back and forth conversations. But we will post responses and make key points in ongoing conversations about the regional plan or other directly related issues.”
Many government agencies craft media strategies, monitor social media and coordinate their messages in the news, so SANDAG is not unique, said Bey-Ling Sha, director of San Diego State University’s School of Journalism and Media Studies.
“People have a choice. They can not know what their government is doing, or they can fund the government to do the work of the people but also inform the people about what work is being done,” Sha said.
But, she said, there is a tension between putting out information and trying to persuade the public.
Colleen Windsor, SANDAG’s communications director, said the agency’s media strategy on the transportation plan was to educate the public.
It was also meant to “educate the reporters who were covering the regional plan to let them know what we’ve done, how many iterations have been going on, what was in, what was out, and making sure the public knew how they could provide input,” said Windsor, who was former Mayor Dick Murphy’s press secretary until he resigned in 2005.
But emails among SANDAG’s communications team also suggest there was an effort to shape media coverage and convince the public the plan was good.
Developing a media strategy
About half of SANDAG’s spending on outside media consultants in 2015 was split between community organizations that did “outreach to disadvantaged and hard to reach communities,” according to SANDAG spokesman Jeff Stinchcomb. The other half — $256,725 — went to San Diego-based public relations firm MJE Marketing to develop a regional transportation plan website, post to Facebook and Twitter, and plan public outreach meetings. The firm sent a media plan to SANDAG staff in September.
It lists tasks to accomplish week by week. Among them: “Identify and prep board spokespersons, identify community papers for op-eds, encourage supporters to submit letters/comments, meet with UT Editorial Board, meet with KPBS, meet with Andrew Keatts, pitch story ideas.”
This shows a document that details some of SANDAG’s media strategy as it worked in 2015 to win support for his regional transportation plan.
MJE also signed a contract for up to $35,000 with public relations consultant Rachel Laing, a former spokeswoman for Mayor Jerry Sanders, who wrote “media task lists.” One sent on Sept. 21 included holding “briefings” with four local journalists, writing op-eds in eight community newspapers and meeting with the editorial board of The San Diego Union-Tribune for “editorial support.”
It also said Laing would pitch two stories: “Is ‘Transit-First truly an option?” and “What would it take to meet the governor’s executive order?”
The more than $250,000 spent on MJE is taxpayer money, Windsor confirmed. She said the funding came out of the budget for individual projects. SANDAG is required to do public outreach on each project it does, and sets a budget that includes internal communication staff salaries and outside consultants.
Windsor said SANDAG hired MJE and other media consultants because she only had one staff member dedicated to media for the regional transportation plan.
“The regional plan is a 35-year planning document that touches every single person in this region, so having one person, and I had one person doing the regional plan, it is impossible for that person to do that much outreach,” she said. “So we hired consultants to be an extension of that arm, to do some of that boots-on-the-ground public outreach. Did they provide some media ideas? Sure. But that wasn’t the bulk of why they were hired.”
Emails show at least four members of the SANDAG communications team regularly discussed media strategy: Windsor, Hicks, Stinchcomb and Joy De Korte, electronic media coordinator.
SANDAG’s communications staff does public outreach about the agency’s “more than 150 projects and programs that have an annual budget of approximately $1.4 billion,” Stinchcomb said. In 2015, the agency spent $3.6 million on outside firms for marketing and communications for all of its projects.
The communications departments for the city of San Diego and San Diego County do not hire outside firms, officials for each said. The city has 31 staff members in its communications department with a combined annual salary of $1.6 million. The county has 11 communications staff who earn a combined $840,000 a year.
Writing opinion pieces
In the months leading up to the regional transportation plan vote, SANDAG planned to publish opinion articles, called op-eds, in regional newspapers.
“One focused on North County, one on South County, one on East County, and central that would likely be the UT, but also maybe even central San Diego, like City Heights type area,” Hicks wrote in a Sept. 3 email. “As well as others that hopefully we can place in various papers that are aimed at specific audiences, like El Latino and Voice and Viewpoint.”
The plan was to have the letters be “signed by a Board member with name recognition in the target audience of the publication as well as possibly a business organization or leader, like the EDC (Economic Development Corp.) from the area or the like,” he wrote.
Windsor told KPBS the purpose of the opinion articles was to “communicate to communities as to what was in the regional plan they could look forward to.”
Because every region is different, “we intentionally went after those community newspapers so we could talk to individual communities to let them know what was in the regional plan.”
But SANDAG staff wrote the same op-ed for each local newspaper, with a few paragraphs substituted depending on the region.
It was published in:
• The Star News in Chula Vista, where it was signed by Chula Vista Mayor Mary Salas and Monica Montaño, chairwoman of the South County Economic Development Council.
• The Mission Times Courier, where it was signed by San Diego County Supervisor Ron Roberts and Santee Councilman Jack Dale.
• Voice of San Diego, where it was signed by Roberts and Dale.
• The Del Mar Times, where it was signed by Roberts and Dale.
The bulk of each article was the same, except for a few paragraphs highlighting different projects in each region.
Emails show SANDAG staff had hoped Solana Beach Mayor Lesa Heebner and Carl Morgan of the North County Economic Development Council would sign The Del Mar Times editorial, but that didn’t happen.
They also asked San Diego City Councilman Todd Gloria and San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce CEO Jerry Sanders to co-sign an op-ed in San Diego Downtown News/San Diego Uptown News.
Gloria’s spokeswoman told SANDAG’s Hicks in an email, “after giving it thought, we have to decline.” The op-ed was instead signed by Roberts and Dale.
Staff also planned to publish the piece in The North Coast News, but the editor passed.
SANDAG staff also planned to publish in The Pomerado News and the East County Californian. It’s not clear from the publications’ websites whether that happened.
Responding to social media posts
On Oct. 1, SANDAG’s De Korte emailed Hicks about some tweets that mentioned SANDAG.
“@SANDAG I’ll have been killed on my bicycle long before then on our region’s horribly dangerous roads,” the user @BikerRobert wrote.
“Voters wanted congestion relief, not money for roads. SANDAG board has interpreted that to be more roads,” @ollingers posted.
“SANDAG’s Gary Gallegos: “Transit is not going to work for every person in the region,” @bikesd tweeted.
Hicks responded to De Korte:
“On these below — should we reply to each individually? If so, in general, this is what I would suggest:
Lawson: The bike EAP will spend 200 million in the next 10 years to build safe bike infrastructure, most of which will be separated from vehicle traffic. Find out more …. check this with Kluth).
Ollinger — The TransNet ordinance lists specific projects and programs, including setting aside funds for transit, local roads, and highway managed lanes. See that list of project here — link to transnet page.
Bike SD — thanks for your comment.
Can you work on polishing these up and getting them approved?”
The exchange is typical. De Korte spent one to five hours a week monitoring social media, according to SANDAG. She then sent tweets and Facebook posts about SANDAG to Hicks, who often forwarded them to other SANDAG staff to weigh in on responses. Sometimes, multiple emails were sent and days passed before a response was settled on for a single tweet.
In another exchange, De Korte sent Hicks a link to the Twitter profile for @TransitSD that included several negative tweets about SANDAG.
“Hmmmm not sure how to respond to that barrage. Your thoughts on that?” Hicks wrote.
“I’m not sure Twitter is the place to respond to these. However, maybe we can suggest to them that they are welcome to attend Friday’s Board meeting and speak during public comment period. This way the Board can address their comments directly if they desire. What do you think?” De Korte responded.
“I hate to leave anything unreplied to — but these are the folks suing us, and they are never going to stop — so I seems silly to reply [sic]. Maybe if we took the whole day and replied to every single tweet — but they would probably all have to be cleared through legal,” Hicks wrote back.
They then went through three revisions to arrive at the tweet, “Thank you. We hear your concerns & have tried to address them & those of many other stakeholders in SDForward to achieve a balanced plan. We really appreciate your feedback.”
Windsor said SANDAG views social media as another way to communicate with the public.
“So if somebody’s talking about the regional plan, we certainly want to jump in and let that conversation continue and inform,” she said. “Especially if there’s misinformation.”
Coordinating with elected officials
Last summer, KPBS sent a list of questions to Councilman Gloria’s office for a story about whether SANDAG’s plan did enough to cut greenhouse gas emissions. Gloria is on SANDAG’s board and was specifically singled out for criticism by environmentalists for his support of the plan.
Emails show Gloria’s staff forwarded the questions to SANDAG, which had staffers write up answers and send them back.
Gloria’s spokeswoman at the time, Katie Keach, asked another staffer for the councilman how she felt about Gloria saying what SANDAG had written.
“They seem a bit more defensive in tone than (Gloria) needs to be, in my opinion,” she wrote. “If you agree and (Gloria) wants written responses, I’ll rework them a bit to make them more Todd-esque.”
“They are also too long and wonky,” the staffer, Molly Chase, responded.
Gloria ended up doing a phone interview for the story.
It wasn’t the only time Gloria’s office and SANDAG coordinated their messages.
“SANDAG is trying to use Todd in its communication strategy,” according to a Sept. 10 email written by Keach, who is now the city’s interim communications director.
In response to a request from Voice of San Diego reporter Andrew Keatts, Keach wrote a comment and checked it first with SANDAG.
“I vetted your response and it sounds great,” Windsor responded to Keach. “There is only one correction…the 75% is for transit and active transportation. If you add that, it’s good to go.”
Originally, the statement had only said “transit.”
“This totally aligns with what we gave VOSD,” Windsor wrote in response to another statement Chase forwarded on Oct. 21.
Gloria also went with SANDAG staffers to talk to The San Diego Union-Tribune’s editorial board and to brief KPBS reporters, editors and producers on the regional plan.
“Thanks Katie — went well — Todd was awesome,” Hicks wrote to Keach after the KPBS meeting.
SANDAG staff also looked to other city staffers to support their message. When a report was released suggesting SANDAG’s regional transportation plan would hinder the city from achieving its climate goals, Hicks wrote in an email:
“If we do get press calls tomorrow, do you think there is someone with some credibility at the city who would be willing to stand up and say what you have said below — that they are assuming we reach our goals, and then they will need to follow through with their plans as well to get there — that the (regional plan) is not ‘preventing’ that?”
Staff suggested the city’s sustainability manager, Cody Hooven, or the director of land use, Mike Hansen. Neither responded to the report in the media.
Getting to the vote
Despite opposition from environmental groups and many public speakers, SANDAG’s board unanimously approved the regional transportation plan in October.
Windsor described the media strategy in advance of that vote as “moderately successful.”
“Trying to do a regional plan on television doesn’t always bode well,” she said. “In print it does, because you can explain more. Would we have wanted more press? Sure, but we understand there’s only so much time in a newscast and only so much print in a newspaper.”
She said it was a good use of taxpayer money to buy outside media services.
“We do really good work here at SANDAG to be able to reach as many people as possible and use taxpayer dollars very effectively and efficiently,” she said.
- Editorial Standards Page
- Ethics Policy
- Diversity Statement
- Diversity Staffing Report
- Corrections Policy
- Ownership Structure, Funding
- Founding Date
- Masthead
- Mission Statement with Coverage Priorities
- Fact-checking Standards
- Unnamed Sources Policy
Editorial Standards Page
- Our Mission
- Ethics Policy
- Diversity
- Ownership Structure, Funding and Grants
- Financial Documents
- Fact-checking and Verification Standards
- Unnamed Sources
- Corrections and Clarifications
- Actionable Feedback and Newsroom Contacts
- Masthead
- Byline Policy
- The Trust Project
- Privacy Policy
Our Mission
inewsource is a nonprofit, nonpartisan newsroom dedicated to improving lives in the San Diego region and beyond through impactful, data-based investigative and accountability journalism.
Our Vision
Betrayals of the public trust are revealed and rectified, wrongdoing is deterred, and inequities are illuminated thanks to inewsource’s deep, dogged, fact-based reporting.
Our Values
Truth: Above all else, we value the importance of a free and credible press. Truth is the cornerstone of democracy and the core value for inewsource.
Transparency: We build trust with our readers by adhering to the highest standards and ethics, and to reporting with facts, precision and context.
Collaboration: Our newsroom prioritizes collaboration over competition. We regularly partner with media outlets on reporting projects and to share content.
Community: Our reporting serves the San Diego region, and we strive to build relationships with our audience by getting out into the community to listen and engage.
Ethics Policy
inewsource will conduct its business with the highest standards of decency, fairness and accuracy. These standards shall apply equally to inewsource employees, freelancers and all others engaged in gathering information on behalf of inewsource. All receive a copy of these ethical standards.
In the course of our reporting, we will consistently:
● Identify our organization and ourselves fully and avoid false representations of any kind to any source.
● Obtain consent from all parties before electronically recording any interview or conversation except in extraordinary cases authorized by the Managing Editor and Editor. If a source refuses to be taped, that must be honored; no recordings are to be made without consent.
● Respect the individual’s right to privacy. inewsource will never manipulate or barter private, personal, health, financial or other extraneous information in the course of preparing its reports.
● Any source we describe or write about in any significant manner must be contacted. The employee should document all efforts to contact the source, and if unsuccessful, should summarize these efforts at contact in the body of his/her writing.
In addition, inewsource follows the Code of Ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists. The latest version, revised in 2014, can be found here.
Editorial Independence Policy
We subscribe to standards of editorial independence adopted by the Institute for Nonprofit News (INN) as follows:
Our organization retains full authority over editorial content to protect the best journalistic and business interests of our organization. We will maintain a firewall between news coverage decisions and sources of all revenue. Acceptance of financial support does not constitute implied or actual endorsement of donors or their products, services or opinions.
We accept gifts, grants and sponsorships from individuals and organizations for the general support of our activities, but our news judgments are made independently and not on the basis of donor support. Our organization also may consider donations to support the coverage of particular topics, but our organization maintains editorial control of the coverage. We will cede no right of review or influence of editorial content, nor of unauthorized distribution of editorial content.
Our organization will make public all donors who give a total of $1,000 or more. We will accept anonymous donations for general support only if it is clear that sufficient safeguards have been put into place that the expenditure of that donation is made independently by our organization and in compliance with INN’s Membership Standards.
Diversity
Diverse Voices
Inclusiveness is at the heart of thinking and acting as journalists, and it supports the educational mandate of inewsource. Race, class, generation, gender, sexual orientation, ability, and geography all affect point of view. inewsource believes that reflecting societal differences in reporting leads to better, more nuanced stories and a better-informed community.
inewsource is committed to employment equity and diversity.
Diverse Staffing Report
Below is a breakdown of staffing data at inewsource. We determine the composition of our staff by asking them to self-identify. It is based on a newsroom of 11 and a total staff of 15 as of August 2020. Percentages are based on 15 total survey responses. The numbers include full-time and part-time staff, full-time fellows and full-time and part-time interns.
| All Staff Percentages are based on 15 total survey responses. The numbers include full-time and part-time staff, full-time fellows and full-time and part-time interns. | Newsroom Percentages are based on 15 completed survey responses to this question. | Business Percentages are based on 15 completed survey responses to this question. | |||
| Gender Identity | Gender Identity | Gender Identity | |||
| Women | 80% | Women | 82% | Women | 75% |
| Men | 20% | Men | 18% | Men | 25% |
| Sexual Orientation | Sexual Orientation | Sexual Orientation | |||
| Straight | 87% | Straight | 82% | Straight | 100% |
| LGBTQ-identifying | 7% | LGBTQ-identifying | 7% | ||
| Not specified | 7% | Not specified | 7% | ||
| Speak a language beyond English at home | 33% | Speak a language beyond English at home | 18% | Speak a language beyond English at home | 75% |
| Race/Ethnicity | Race/Ethnicity | Race/Ethnicity | |||
| White | 67% | White | 73% | White | 50% |
| Hispanic or Latinx | 20% | Two or more races | 18% | Hispanic or Latinx | 50% |
| Two or more races | 13% | Hispanic or Latinx | 9% | ||
| Age | Age | Age | |||
| 20-29 | 40% | 20-29 | 45% | 20-29 | 25% |
| 30-39 | 47% | 30-39 | 45% | 30-39 | 50% |
| 60 or older | 13% | 60 or older | 9% | 60 or older | 25% |
* The percentages in the charts have been rounded and may not add up to 100.
Ownership Structure, Funding and Grants
inewsource is a nonprofit organization, whose legal name is Investigative Newsource. It does business as inewsource. The business was incorporated on Aug. 4, 2009 in the state of California. Tax-exempt status as a 501c3 was granted by the IRS on Sept. 15, 2010. inewsource is funded primarily by individual contributions and foundation grants. We are guided by a board of directors.
Editorial independence: Journalists employed by inewsource take no editorial direction from donors whose contributions may support the organization. inewsource will not hesitate to report on its donors when events warrant. Our Editorial Independence Policy details the firewall between journalism and revenue.
To be transparent with the public, inewsource lists its donors on its website. In cases where a donor is the subject of an inewsource story, additional disclosure will be made.
Financial Documents
We do our due diligence to earn your trust in our reporting, as well as in our governance and financial sustainability. All of our financial documents are made available to view so that our supporters can trust we are sound stewards of your philanthropy. Review our IRS Form 990s, audited financial statements and annual reports:
Tax Returns
Financial Statements
Annual Reports
Fact-checking and Verification Standards
Transparency is one of our core values. Today, there is a need to build trust with our audience because new media and ways of communicating spread lies and slanted news faster than “real” news. At the same time, this era of new technologies makes it easier than ever for news organizations to be transparent. People don’t just have to believe us, they can investigate our investigations with our source materials.
Transparency is key to building credibility.
inewsource reporters have primary responsibility for reporting, writing, and fact-checking their stories. But before a story is published, the reporter reviews all facts and sources with an editor or another reporter. Facts must be traced to a primary source.
In addition, we “transparify” certain investigative stories. This process involves publishing a version of the web story with hyperlinks to all the story’s facts. This is proof that all facts have been documented with primary evidence. We do this to build trust with our readers and to be as transparent as we hope the public figures and institutions that we hold accountable will be.
Unnamed Sources
Not all sources are created equal. Some sources cannot speak authoritatively, provide proper analysis or speak specifically to every inquiry placed before them. To maintain the integrity of our reporting, inewsource reporters must select sources who can speak with validity to the topic at hand, and avoid presenting unqualified or underqualified sources as experts.
If an interviewed source has a conflict of interest, or whose qualifications may be tangential or limited, reporters will note that within the context of the story.
It is incumbent upon reporters to fully background their sources to uncover conflicts of interest or slant prior to using them in a story.
Unless discussed prior to an interview, all subjects talking to inewsource journalists are on the record. Specifically, the source is identified by name and title, and their exact or paraphrased words are attributed to them for publication. If journalists speak with sources who are not politicians, public figures or those not commonly interviewed by journalists, staff should explain clearly that information discussed will be on the record and for publication.
There are times, however, when information may be critical for a story but cannot be found or verified by other means. For example, a source may be able to confirm specific information about a series of events they may have witnessed, but have legitimate concerns about using their name or title. The repercussions to the source could be legal, job-related retribution or personal safety. The source and journalist must discuss these potential dangers and terms of use should be agreed upon by both parties.
If inewsource publishes information from an anonymous source, inewsource will explain to readers, in as much detail as possible, why we agreed to anonymity.
Corrections and Clarifications
inewsource strives for accuracy in everything we do, which is why we are committed to fact checking our content. But sometimes we make errors. When that happens, we correct them. We also clarify stories when something we’ve written is confusing or could be misinterpreted.
We endeavor to always be transparent about our commitment to correcting errors and clarifying misperceptions. When staffers see, hear or read about a possible issue with the accuracy of any inewsource content, they are expected to bring it to the attention of an editor and the web producer so it can be evaluated to determine how to proceed.
Including the web producer is key because inewsource is a multimedia news organization and shares its content with multiple partners on multiple platforms. The web producer must alert these partners about corrections and clarifications.
Corrections and clarifications should be included at the bottom of stories and dated.
Actionable Feedback and Newsroom Contacts
Our audiences know the region we cover and have a stake in maintaining and improving the quality of life in San Diego and Imperial counties. We know your knowledge and insights can help shape what we cover and how we cover it. We invite your comments and complaints on news stories, suggestions for issues to cover or sources to consult. We rely on you to tell us when we get it right and when we need to keep pushing.
Your comments, questions and suggestions can be sent to the team as a whole at contact@inewsource.org or you can contact a specific member of our staff.
Masthead
CEO, Editor and Founder: Lorie Hearn, loriehearn@inewsource.org
Lorie Hearn is the chief executive officer, editor and founder of inewsource. She founded inewsource in the summer of 2009, following a successful reporting and editing career in newspapers. She retired from The San Diego Union-Tribune, where she had been a reporter, Metro Editor and finally the senior editor for Metro and Watchdog Journalism. In addition to department oversight, Hearn personally managed a four-person watchdog team, composed of two data specialists and two investigative reporters. Hearn was a Nieman Foundation fellow at Harvard University in 1994-95. She focused on juvenile justice and drug control policy, a natural course to follow her years as a courts and legal affairs reporter at the San Diego Union and then the Union-Tribune.
Hearn became Metro Editor in 1999 and oversaw regional and city news coverage, which included the city of San Diego’s financial debacle and near bankruptcy. Reporters and editors on Metro during her tenure were part of the Pulitzer Prize-winning stories that exposed Congressman Randy “Duke” Cunningham and led to his imprisonment.
Hearn began her journalism career as a reporter for the Bucks County Courier Times, a small daily outside of Philadelphia, shortly after graduating from the University of Delaware. During the decades following, she moved through countless beats at five newspapers on both coasts.
High-profile coverage included the historic state Supreme Court election in 1986, when three sitting justices were ousted from the bench, and the 1992 execution of Robert Alton Harris. That gas chamber execution was the first time the death penalty was carried out in California in 25 years.
In her nine years as Metro Editor at the Union-Tribune, Hearn made watchdog reporting a priority. Her reporters produced award-winning investigations covering large and small local governments. The depth and breadth of their public service work was most evident in coverage of the wildfires of 2003 and then 2007, when more than half a million people were evacuated from their homes.
Managing Editor: Mark J. Rochester, markrochester@inewsource.org
Mark J. Rochester began as inewsource managing editor in April 2021, having served as editor in chief at Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative newsroom in Manhattan. He was previously senior news director for investigations at the Detroit Free Press. Both newsrooms, he notes, shared a commitment to diversity and inclusion, and their investigative journalism often received national recognition for exposing problems impacting communities of color.
His family looks forward to returning to California, having spent more than seven years in San Francisco where Rochester was a senior manager for the Associated Press. While with the news cooperative, he led computer-assisted reporting training efforts around the West, both inside and outside of AP, and conducted a widely used analysis of the $74 million in campaign contributions that went toward the California gay marriage ballot initiative in 2008. The AP analyzed who gave and why and then made the data available to member newspapers. The resulting series of stories based on the data was AP’s 2009 Pulitzer nomination for Local Reporting.
Rochester, who served as a Pulitzer Prize jurist in 2017, also has held senior leadership positions at the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, The Denver Post, Newsday and The Indianapolis Star. Rochester is vice president of Investigative Reporters & Editors Inc., the 6,000+ member international organization dedicated to improving investigative journalism. He also serves on the national advisory board of the Investigative Reporting Workshop at American University in Washington, D.C.
Byline Policy
Most of our articles carry a byline to identify the author. In some cases, inewsource will use a brand byline such as “Staff” or “inewsource” for internal or editorial information about the newsroom. In these instances, inewsource‘s Editor and Managing Editor are responsible for content that uses a brand byline.
The Trust Project
inewsource is proud to be a member of The Trust Project and support efforts to increase transparency in journalism by displaying the 8 Trust Indicators on our stories. We launched the Trust Indicators on Sep. 16, 2020.
Privacy Policy
inewsource has prepared this Privacy Policy to explain how we collect, use, protect, and share information when you use our inewsource.org website (the “Site“) or when you use any of our services (the “Services“).
By using the Site or Services you consent to this Privacy Policy.
Log Data
Like many site operators, we collect information that your browser sends whenever you visit our site (“Log Data”).
This Log Data may include information such as your computer’s Internet Protocol (“IP”) address, browser type, browser version, the pages of our site that you visit, the time and date of your visit, the time spent on those pages and other statistics.
Cookies
Cookies are files with small amount of data, which may include an anonymous unique identifier. Cookies are sent to your browser from a web site and stored on your computer or mobile device.
Like many sites, we use “cookies” to collect information. You can instruct your browser to refuse all cookies or to indicate when a cookie is being sent. However, if you do not accept cookies, you may not be able to use some portions of our site.
Certain pages on our site may set other third party cookies. For example, we may embed content, such as videos, from another site that sets a cookie. While we try to minimize these third party cookies, we can’t always control what cookies this third party content sets.
Additionally, we may use third party services — such as those that provide social media conveniences, measure traffic, send newsletters and facilitate donations — that may place cookies on your computer. We don’t have any way of knowing how such services handle the resulting data internally. inewsource makes no claim, nor takes liability for the insecure submission of information via these applications.
Here are the services whose cookies you can find on inewsource.org:
- Sharing buttons for Facebook and Twitter. These use the standard scripts provided by each company.
- Google Analytics, which we use to measure site traffic. Google Analytics gathers certain non-personally identifying information over time, such as your IP address, browser type, internet service provider, referring and exit pages, time stamp, and similar data. We also use Facebook Pixel to measure, optimize and build audiences for advertising campaigns served on Facebook. In particular it enables us to see how our users move between devices when accessing our website and Facebook, to ensure that our Facebook advertising is seen by our users most likely to be interested in such advertising by analyzing which content a user has viewed and interacted with on our website.
- Stripe, which allows us to accept donations through our website.
- Salesforce to manage newsletter subscriber, donor, and other identifiable user data.
- Mailchimp, to manage newsletter distributions. We collect your email address if you choose to subscribe to one of our email newsletters or email news alerts. Other optional information that you enter when subscribing – such as your first and last names or city are simply so that we can deliver more personalized email newsletters. We DO NOT sell, rent or market your information to any other parties. We retain your information only as long as necessary to provide your service. When we send emails, it collects some data about which users open the emails and which links are clicked. We use this information to optimize our email newsletters and, as aggregate information, to explain what percentage of our users open and interact with our newsletters.
Personal Data
We only collect personally identifiable information such as your name and email address when you sign up for a newsletter, donate to our organization, or otherwise submit it to us voluntarily. We do not share your personal data with any third parties other than some common service providers, whose products use your information to help us improve our site, deliver newsletters, or allow us to offer donation opportunities.
inewsource limits access to all user data for the purposes of newsletter, fundraising, and customer service only. User data is not sold to or otherwise shared with anyone not working with or for the inewsource.
You may unsubscribe or opt-out of our email and mail communications at any time by hitting the “unsubscribe” button in any email you receive from inewsource, or by emailing us at contact@inewsource.org or calling us at 619-594-5100.
Donor Information
The identities of all donors will be listed on our website. inewsource does not share, trade, sell, or otherwise release donors’ personal information to any third parties.
Refunds
If you encounter errors when donating on the website, please contact us at members@inewsource.org. For example, if you submit a donation for an incorrect amount or make a duplicate transaction please email us immediately so we can reverse the charges.
Cancellation of Recurring Donations
You can cancel your monthly recurring donations free of charge by notifying us at members@inewsource.org.
Links to Other Websites
Our site may contain links to documents, resources or other websites that we think may be of interest to you. We have no control over these other sites or their content. You should be aware when you leave our site for another, and remember that other sites are governed by their own user agreements and privacy policies, which should be available to you to read.
Disclaimers and Limitation of Liability
Although we take reasonable steps to prevent the introduction of viruses, worms, “Trojan Horses” or other destructive materials to our site, we do not guarantee or warrant that our site or materials that may be downloaded from our site are free from such destructive features. We are not liable for any damages or harm attributable to such features. We are not liable for any claim, loss or injust based on errors, omissions, interruptions or other inaccuracies on our site, nor for any claim, loss or injust that results from your use of this site or your breach of any provision of this User Agreement.
Contact Us
If there are any questions regarding this privacy policy, please contact us at contact@inewsource.org or call us at 619-594-5100.
Ethics Policy
This policy can be found on this page.
Diversity Statement
This policy can be found on this page.
Diversity Staffing Report
This policy can be found on this page.
Corrections Policy
This policy can be found on this page.
Ownership Structure, Funding
This policy can be found on this page.
Founding Date
2009-11-01
Masthead
This policy can be found on this page.
Mission Statement with Coverage Priorities
This policy can be found on this page.
Fact-checking Standards
This policy can be found on this page.
Unnamed Sources Policy
This policy can be found on this page.
Article Post Types
post