A UC San Diego doctor — who was the centerpiece of an inewsource investigation this year — violated a litany of university policies while developing and researching his experimental brain treatment, according to a recently concluded UCSD and UC Office of the President inquiry.
That two-year investigation into Dr. Kevin Murphy found he misused university resources to promote and benefit his private companies, falsely claimed ownership over an invention, provided patient care without authorization and repeatedly violated university policies about disclosing his business interests.
Murphy’s attorney said he and the doctor dispute the findings and plan to sue the University of California.
Why this matters
REWIRED was a two-part inewsource investigation into an experimental brain treatment that sparked mayhem for a UCSD doctor who developed it and a Navy SEAL who had a psychotic break after receiving it.
UCSD has now finished its own inquiry into how a $10 million gift to UCSD to study the treatment was wasted at one of America’s premier research universities.
An independent law firm conducted the inquiry after a UCSD whistleblower in 2018 alleged Murphy misused a $10 million donation meant for research to benefit his private businesses.
Investigators interviewed 30 witnesses and reviewed “significant electronic documentation,” a university spokesperson told inewsource.
“UC San Diego reserves all rights and remedies with respect to the investigative findings, including recovery of misspent funds, discussions with donors, referrals to other entities, and assertion of ownership rights” for technology Murphy developed during his time at the university, the spokesperson said.
Murphy is no longer with UCSD and is continuing to grow his private businesses throughout the country. He has not offered to refund any of the donor’s money he already spent.
UCSD called its investigation “complex and far-ranging” but would not give inewsource the full report. Instead the university provided a summary which did not address several key findings uncovered in inewsource’s investigation.
Those include Murphy’s role in potentially prompting a former Navy SEAL’s psychotic break, committing apparent academic plagiarism and repeatedly making unsupported claims about the effectiveness of his treatment.
The findings also didn’t elaborate on how a top UCSD attorney was able to help Murphy set up private companies without disclosing his involvement to the university.
Murphy’s employment at UCSD ended June 30 when his contract with the school expired. He would not comment for this story on the advice of his attorney, Mark Quigley of Greene Broillet & Wheeler.
Quigley told inewsource that the University of California will not provide him with supporting evidence for its “very serious allegations.”
“I think it’s incredibly unfair to Dr. Murphy to publish this stuff without giving us the backup,” he said, adding that Murphy plans to sue his former employer for wrongful termination, whistleblower retaliation and intellectual property rights.
“So, we’re off to the races I suppose,” the attorney said.
In December, UCSD spokesperson Kim Kennedy promised inewsource a sit-down interview to discuss the investigation once it was completed. In July, just weeks after Murphy’s contract expired, school officials refused to honor their agreement.
Nor will the university address evidence Murphy provided to inewsource that appears to disprove at least one of its conclusions.
A recap of REWIRED
Murphy specializes in pediatric cancer care, and until last year he was a vice chairman at UCSD’s Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences.
He was also a father desperate to alleviate his son’s violent autism when he first heard about an electromagnetic treatment for altering brainwaves called transcranial magnetic stimulation, or TMS. Murphy explained this over the course of three interviews lasting more than 13 hours last fall, as part of inewsource’s REWIRED investigation.
Murphy became a convert after noticing his son’s improvement following TMS sessions at a private clinic. He purchased a TMS machine and used it at a San Diego clinic to treat “just about everything,” from PTSD, autism and Alzheimer’s disease to traumatic brain injuries, eating disorders and a bad golf swing.
That’s how he met Charles Kreutzkamp, a San Diego philanthropist whose cancer treatments led to thinking and memory problems known as “chemobrain.”
Murphy treated those symptoms with TMS and was so successful, he said, that the Kreutzkamp family left him one of the largest-ever research donations for a UCSD employee upon his death in 2015.
That’s where the trouble began.
At first, Murphy and UCSD leadership disagreed over where the donation should go. As written, Kreutzkamp’s endowment didn’t mention TMS or Murphy. It said the $10 million would fund cancer research.
Kreutzkamp’s widow, Ernestina, clarified in writing the following year that the money was meant for Murphy “to be used by him, and under his direction, in order to support his time for TMS research.”
The letter was written in flawless English, though Ernestina speaks very little of the language. Her lawyer later told inewsource he wasn’t sure who wrote it.
The dispute led to grudges, Murphy said, because he “had to extract a $10 million lollipop out of the cancer director’s mouth.”
The donation eventually ended up in a gift fund that Murphy could use to study his method of “personalizing” TMS treatment, which involves monitoring a patient’s brainwaves while adjusting the strength, location and frequency of the electromagnetic burst.
Standard TMS has been around for decades and is a proven treatment for alleviating symptoms of depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder and migraines. However, there is no scientific research to back up the claims Murphy has repeatedly made to veterans, nonprofit groups and the public about how effective his personalized treatment is.
Murphy admits this but has said he’d still declare to the “entire academic community” that his version of TMS is superior to any other.
Murphy was hoping to prove the efficacy of his treatment on patients with a wide range of mental disorders by putting them through clinical trials, which is what he said the $10 million was for.
While getting those started, Murphy was also founding and playing executive roles in personalized TMS-related companies: The Medical Synchrony Center, The Medical Synchrony Research Institute, Mindset, PeakLogic, FreqLogic and Peak M.D. Institute.
Some of these businesses operated out of the same building that Murphy was using for his clinical trials.
In June 2018, a member of Murphy’s UCSD department alleged the doctor was using the $10 million Kreutzkamp donation to directly benefit his private companies.
To resolve concerns about business conflicts, Murphy stepped down from his full-time role to become a part-time contractor at UCSD and wrote in a declaration under penalty of perjury that he did not use the gift fund to create his personalized TMS software.
Some equipment mixups occurred, he explained to inewsource in interviews, but everything had been resolved and nothing was missing.
Investigation and findings
Boies Schiller Flexner, the law firm UCSD brought on to investigate Murphy, however, did find numerous problems with the doctor’s activities, including that he used university equipment, property, facilities, staff and consultants to promote and benefit his private businesses.
It also found that “since at least 2015, Dr. Murphy has repeatedly violated” university policy by “founding businesses and/or engaging in those businesses in an executive capacity without prior approval.”
In November, a physical inventory was taken of equipment Murphy purchased with Kreutzkamp gift funds. It found 28 items were missing for a total of $158,005.
The UCSD investigation also found that Murphy:
- Cared for patients outside the university without approval and retained income from those activities.
- Violated university policy regarding the disclosure of inventions and falsely claimed ownership over an invention.
- Didn’t abstain from financial conflicts of interest, in further violation of university policies.
“UC San Diego takes these investigative findings seriously and, as a result, will establish more sharply defined guard rails to help prevent future inappropriate activities,” a UCSD spokesperson emailed inewsource.
“For example, internal controls will be bolstered to improve regulation and oversight of gift expenditures. Conflict of commitment reviews will be more strictly enforced. And relevant policies and protocols revised with expanded education and training.”
Local, investigative journalism delivered straight to your inbox.
The university didn’t say Murphy was fired but that his contract had expired during the investigation and was not renewed. Murphy’s attorney called it being fired and said that will be “one of the issues in the coming lawsuit.”
UCSD has not said what it plans to do with the remainder of the $10 million donation, since more than half of it has been spent and the university has nothing to show for it. No one has gone through any of Murphy’s personalized TMS research trials.
An attorney for Ernestina Kreutzkamp, Charles’ widow, told inewsource last week that UCSD reached out to him about the conclusion of its investigation and said the remaining funds would be overseen by Dr. Zafiris Daskalakis, the new chair of the university’s Psychiatry Department.
Daskalakis has performed dozens of studies on TMS and its effectiveness in treating depression, schizophrenia and other severe psychiatric disorders.
What the investigation didn’t cover
The investigation’s findings as provided did not touch on a range of accusations against Murphy that were uncovered during inewsource’s investigation into the doctor.
Take San Diego veteran John Surmont.
The former Navy SEAL considered himself Murphy’s “patient zero” after having undergone at least 234 rounds of personalized TMS under the doctor’s care.
Navy veteran John Surmont at Dr. Kevin Murphy’s clinic to receive PrTMS treatment on April 28, 2017. (Courtesy of John Surmont) 
Dr. Kevin Murphy treated former Navy SEAL John Surmont so often that the doctor gave the veteran office space. Surmont is pictured at Murphy’s clinic on April 28, 2017. (Courtesy of John Surmont)
The veteran, who had no history of psychosis, mania, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or hallucinations, eventually had a psychotic break. He spent weeks running scared around L.A., thinking he was on a military mission with a nuclear weapon inside him, until being arrested at gunpoint.
Murphy told inewsource it was highly unlikely his treatment caused Surmont’s break, claiming there was a greater chance of being struck by lightning. He also made a number of false allegations against his patient during his interviews.
Surmont filed a complaint with the California Medical Board in early 2019.
In ruling against him in April, the board described to Surmont the state-required burden of proof to pursue administrative action against Murphy:
“This is a higher standard of proof than that of most civil proceedings, including malpractice lawsuits, which only require a ‘preponderance of the evidence,’” the board wrote.
Surmont said he plans to appeal the ruling.
The UCSD investigation summary also didn’t touch on evidence showing that Murphy claimed a competitor’s work as his own to justify beginning human research trials at the San Diego VA.
After reviewing Murphy’s 2016 research proposal for a personalized TMS trial, ethics expert Dr. Harold Garner told inewsource, “This is what would be considered by scientific professionals to be plagiarized material.”
He added, “If Murphy cannot produce laboratory notebooks from whence the data came, it would be considered fabricated or falsified data,” and that it’s “up to UCSD if they desire to do something.”
Six months ago, inewsource emailed UCSD’s vice chancellor for research, Sandra Brown, about the plagiarism. Reporters also asked whether it was a problem that Murphy went outside the university’s institutional review board to get two other human research trials approved without notifying the school.
A spokesperson replied: “Research misconduct investigations are confidential and the university will not confirm or deny whether there is an ongoing investigation.”
A third inewsource finding concerned Murphy’s wife, Lisa, a chief administrator at UCSD Health who helped with her husband’s businesses.
She was listed as CEO of one of Murphy’s personalized TMS companies, though she told inewsource that was a filing error. She also sent estimated revenues and expenses to investors interested in taking over two of Murphy’s personalized TMS clinics in Indiana in 2018.
The university investigation summary did not mention her involvement.
Another inewsource finding that went unaddressed by the university concerns medical claims Murphy has made — and continues to make — about his treatment.
In a blog post about the COVID-19 pandemic, Murphy’s private company refers to personalized TMS as “a proven treatment that quickly relieves anxiety, depression, and stress.”
Personalized TMS is a “solution” for ADHD, according to the website, and is “proven to be safe.” It’s also “better” than or “improves” upon standard TMS for alleviating depression, PTSD, concussions and anxiety.
But Murphy’s personalized version of TMS has never undergone a clinical trial and no peer-reviewed data exists to back up the statements.
It is Murphy’s opinion, though patients wouldn’t know that unless they dug into the site’s FAQ page, which explains the company relies on its “own understanding” of patient experiences.
The fault of others
Murphy has blamed nearly every mistake made related to the Kreutzkamp gift fund on others — more than a dozen secretaries, managers, bosses and administrators who were involved in the donation and research.
“The real story here is a big, incompetent, jealous, bureaucratic organization that doesn’t talk to each other,” Murphy told inewsource for its earlier investigation.
He filed a whistleblower complaint last year against former campus compliance officer, Dan Weissburg, for trying to impede his success.
Murphy’s attorney, Quigley, specializes in representing whistleblowers and received a “Giant Slayer” award in 2015 for exposing “evidence of corruption and cover-up at the highest levels” of UCLA’s Geffen School of Medicine.
“And I have a number of cases against the University of California for retaliating against people who are mandated to report illegal conduct and fraud and waste, which is exactly what Dr. Murphy did, and then he ended up getting fired for it,” Quigley said. “I see it over and over again.”
Earlier this year, Murphy provided inewsource with emails and contracts showing he received assistance from Michael McDermott, a former top UCSD lawyer, while establishing his private TMS companies and starting up his clinical trials at the university. McDermott was listed as an officer of several of Murphy’s businesses while also serving as the UCSD health system’s chief counsel. He ran a company that contracted to earn money from at least one of the doctor’s ventures.
McDermott never listed these connections on his annual UCSD disclosure forms.
Murphy has said he made clear to investigators that he had approval from McDermott, a university higher-up, for his research and business activities that later came under scrutiny.
But the UCSD investigation concluded otherwise.
“With respect to Dr. Murphy’s position that he relied on the advice of or sought approval from specific members of UC San Diego leadership, this position was not supported by the evidence,” the findings state.
Quigley said that doesn’t make sense.
“I guess we’ll have to talk to McDermott and find out what his involvement was, but I’ve seen a million documents with his name on them,” he said.
What happens next
Though Murphy is no longer at UCSD, medical practices that offer his brand of personalized TMS continue to expand throughout the U.S., while some appear to have shut down since inewsource’s February investigation.
There are currently providers in California, Florida, Hawaii, Indiana, Michigan, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Texas and Utah, according to Murphy’s website.
Two human research studies on personalized TMS, funded by the U.S. Special Operations Command, are still scheduled to be conducted by the Air Force Research Laboratory and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center later this year, according to a spokesperson for the command.
“U.S. Special Operations Command is aware of the investigation and will take into account any facts that come to light to determine their impact on future studies,” the spokesperson said.
Quigley said he expects Murphy will file a lawsuit against the University of California in September.
Type of Content
News: Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
- Editorial Standards Page
- Ethics Policy
- Diversity Statement
- Diversity Staffing Report
- Corrections Policy
- Ownership Structure, Funding
- Founding Date
- Masthead
- Mission Statement with Coverage Priorities
- Fact-checking Standards
- Unnamed Sources Policy
Editorial Standards Page
- Our Mission
- Ethics Policy
- Diversity
- Ownership Structure, Funding and Grants
- Financial Documents
- Fact-checking and Verification Standards
- Unnamed Sources
- Corrections and Clarifications
- Actionable Feedback and Newsroom Contacts
- Masthead
- Byline Policy
- The Trust Project
- Privacy Policy
Our Mission
inewsource is a nonprofit, nonpartisan newsroom dedicated to improving lives in the San Diego region and beyond through impactful, data-based investigative and accountability journalism.
Our Vision
Betrayals of the public trust are revealed and rectified, wrongdoing is deterred, and inequities are illuminated thanks to inewsource’s deep, dogged, fact-based reporting.
Our Values
Truth: Above all else, we value the importance of a free and credible press. Truth is the cornerstone of democracy and the core value for inewsource.
Transparency: We build trust with our readers by adhering to the highest standards and ethics, and to reporting with facts, precision and context.
Collaboration: Our newsroom prioritizes collaboration over competition. We regularly partner with media outlets on reporting projects and to share content.
Community: Our reporting serves the San Diego region, and we strive to build relationships with our audience by getting out into the community to listen and engage.
Ethics Policy
inewsource will conduct its business with the highest standards of decency, fairness and accuracy. These standards shall apply equally to inewsource employees, freelancers and all others engaged in gathering information on behalf of inewsource. All receive a copy of these ethical standards.
In the course of our reporting, we will consistently:
● Identify our organization and ourselves fully and avoid false representations of any kind to any source.
● Obtain consent from all parties before electronically recording any interview or conversation except in extraordinary cases authorized by the Managing Editor and Editor. If a source refuses to be taped, that must be honored; no recordings are to be made without consent.
● Respect the individual’s right to privacy. inewsource will never manipulate or barter private, personal, health, financial or other extraneous information in the course of preparing its reports.
● Any source we describe or write about in any significant manner must be contacted. The employee should document all efforts to contact the source, and if unsuccessful, should summarize these efforts at contact in the body of his/her writing.
In addition, inewsource follows the Code of Ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists. The latest version, revised in 2014, can be found here.
Editorial Independence Policy
We subscribe to standards of editorial independence adopted by the Institute for Nonprofit News (INN) as follows:
Our organization retains full authority over editorial content to protect the best journalistic and business interests of our organization. We will maintain a firewall between news coverage decisions and sources of all revenue. Acceptance of financial support does not constitute implied or actual endorsement of donors or their products, services or opinions.
We accept gifts, grants and sponsorships from individuals and organizations for the general support of our activities, but our news judgments are made independently and not on the basis of donor support. Our organization also may consider donations to support the coverage of particular topics, but our organization maintains editorial control of the coverage. We will cede no right of review or influence of editorial content, nor of unauthorized distribution of editorial content.
Our organization will make public all donors who give a total of $1,000 or more. We will accept anonymous donations for general support only if it is clear that sufficient safeguards have been put into place that the expenditure of that donation is made independently by our organization and in compliance with INN’s Membership Standards.
Diversity
Diverse Voices
Inclusiveness is at the heart of thinking and acting as journalists, and it supports the educational mandate of inewsource. Race, class, generation, gender, sexual orientation, ability, and geography all affect point of view. inewsource believes that reflecting societal differences in reporting leads to better, more nuanced stories and a better-informed community.
inewsource is committed to employment equity and diversity.
Diverse Staffing Report
Below is a breakdown of staffing data at inewsource. We determine the composition of our staff by asking them to self-identify. It is based on a newsroom of 11 and a total staff of 15 as of August 2020. Percentages are based on 15 total survey responses. The numbers include full-time and part-time staff, full-time fellows and full-time and part-time interns.
| All Staff Percentages are based on 15 total survey responses. The numbers include full-time and part-time staff, full-time fellows and full-time and part-time interns. | Newsroom Percentages are based on 15 completed survey responses to this question. | Business Percentages are based on 15 completed survey responses to this question. | |||
| Gender Identity | Gender Identity | Gender Identity | |||
| Women | 80% | Women | 82% | Women | 75% |
| Men | 20% | Men | 18% | Men | 25% |
| Sexual Orientation | Sexual Orientation | Sexual Orientation | |||
| Straight | 87% | Straight | 82% | Straight | 100% |
| LGBTQ-identifying | 7% | LGBTQ-identifying | 7% | ||
| Not specified | 7% | Not specified | 7% | ||
| Speak a language beyond English at home | 33% | Speak a language beyond English at home | 18% | Speak a language beyond English at home | 75% |
| Race/Ethnicity | Race/Ethnicity | Race/Ethnicity | |||
| White | 67% | White | 73% | White | 50% |
| Hispanic or Latinx | 20% | Two or more races | 18% | Hispanic or Latinx | 50% |
| Two or more races | 13% | Hispanic or Latinx | 9% | ||
| Age | Age | Age | |||
| 20-29 | 40% | 20-29 | 45% | 20-29 | 25% |
| 30-39 | 47% | 30-39 | 45% | 30-39 | 50% |
| 60 or older | 13% | 60 or older | 9% | 60 or older | 25% |
* The percentages in the charts have been rounded and may not add up to 100.
Ownership Structure, Funding and Grants
inewsource is a nonprofit organization, whose legal name is Investigative Newsource. It does business as inewsource. The business was incorporated on Aug. 4, 2009 in the state of California. Tax-exempt status as a 501c3 was granted by the IRS on Sept. 15, 2010. inewsource is funded primarily by individual contributions and foundation grants. We are guided by a board of directors.
Editorial independence: Journalists employed by inewsource take no editorial direction from donors whose contributions may support the organization. inewsource will not hesitate to report on its donors when events warrant. Our Editorial Independence Policy details the firewall between journalism and revenue.
To be transparent with the public, inewsource lists its donors on its website. In cases where a donor is the subject of an inewsource story, additional disclosure will be made.
Financial Documents
We do our due diligence to earn your trust in our reporting, as well as in our governance and financial sustainability. All of our financial documents are made available to view so that our supporters can trust we are sound stewards of your philanthropy. Review our IRS Form 990s, audited financial statements and annual reports:
Tax Returns
Financial Statements
Annual Reports
Fact-checking and Verification Standards
Transparency is one of our core values. Today, there is a need to build trust with our audience because new media and ways of communicating spread lies and slanted news faster than “real” news. At the same time, this era of new technologies makes it easier than ever for news organizations to be transparent. People don’t just have to believe us, they can investigate our investigations with our source materials.
Transparency is key to building credibility.
inewsource reporters have primary responsibility for reporting, writing, and fact-checking their stories. But before a story is published, the reporter reviews all facts and sources with an editor or another reporter. Facts must be traced to a primary source.
In addition, we “transparify” certain investigative stories. This process involves publishing a version of the web story with hyperlinks to all the story’s facts. This is proof that all facts have been documented with primary evidence. We do this to build trust with our readers and to be as transparent as we hope the public figures and institutions that we hold accountable will be.
Unnamed Sources
Not all sources are created equal. Some sources cannot speak authoritatively, provide proper analysis or speak specifically to every inquiry placed before them. To maintain the integrity of our reporting, inewsource reporters must select sources who can speak with validity to the topic at hand, and avoid presenting unqualified or underqualified sources as experts.
If an interviewed source has a conflict of interest, or whose qualifications may be tangential or limited, reporters will note that within the context of the story.
It is incumbent upon reporters to fully background their sources to uncover conflicts of interest or slant prior to using them in a story.
Unless discussed prior to an interview, all subjects talking to inewsource journalists are on the record. Specifically, the source is identified by name and title, and their exact or paraphrased words are attributed to them for publication. If journalists speak with sources who are not politicians, public figures or those not commonly interviewed by journalists, staff should explain clearly that information discussed will be on the record and for publication.
There are times, however, when information may be critical for a story but cannot be found or verified by other means. For example, a source may be able to confirm specific information about a series of events they may have witnessed, but have legitimate concerns about using their name or title. The repercussions to the source could be legal, job-related retribution or personal safety. The source and journalist must discuss these potential dangers and terms of use should be agreed upon by both parties.
If inewsource publishes information from an anonymous source, inewsource will explain to readers, in as much detail as possible, why we agreed to anonymity.
Corrections and Clarifications
inewsource strives for accuracy in everything we do, which is why we are committed to fact checking our content. But sometimes we make errors. When that happens, we correct them. We also clarify stories when something we’ve written is confusing or could be misinterpreted.
We endeavor to always be transparent about our commitment to correcting errors and clarifying misperceptions. When staffers see, hear or read about a possible issue with the accuracy of any inewsource content, they are expected to bring it to the attention of an editor and the web producer so it can be evaluated to determine how to proceed.
Including the web producer is key because inewsource is a multimedia news organization and shares its content with multiple partners on multiple platforms. The web producer must alert these partners about corrections and clarifications.
Corrections and clarifications should be included at the bottom of stories and dated.
Actionable Feedback and Newsroom Contacts
Our audiences know the region we cover and have a stake in maintaining and improving the quality of life in San Diego and Imperial counties. We know your knowledge and insights can help shape what we cover and how we cover it. We invite your comments and complaints on news stories, suggestions for issues to cover or sources to consult. We rely on you to tell us when we get it right and when we need to keep pushing.
Your comments, questions and suggestions can be sent to the team as a whole at contact@inewsource.org or you can contact a specific member of our staff.
Masthead
CEO, Editor and Founder: Lorie Hearn, loriehearn@inewsource.org
Lorie Hearn is the chief executive officer, editor and founder of inewsource. She founded inewsource in the summer of 2009, following a successful reporting and editing career in newspapers. She retired from The San Diego Union-Tribune, where she had been a reporter, Metro Editor and finally the senior editor for Metro and Watchdog Journalism. In addition to department oversight, Hearn personally managed a four-person watchdog team, composed of two data specialists and two investigative reporters. Hearn was a Nieman Foundation fellow at Harvard University in 1994-95. She focused on juvenile justice and drug control policy, a natural course to follow her years as a courts and legal affairs reporter at the San Diego Union and then the Union-Tribune.
Hearn became Metro Editor in 1999 and oversaw regional and city news coverage, which included the city of San Diego’s financial debacle and near bankruptcy. Reporters and editors on Metro during her tenure were part of the Pulitzer Prize-winning stories that exposed Congressman Randy “Duke” Cunningham and led to his imprisonment.
Hearn began her journalism career as a reporter for the Bucks County Courier Times, a small daily outside of Philadelphia, shortly after graduating from the University of Delaware. During the decades following, she moved through countless beats at five newspapers on both coasts.
High-profile coverage included the historic state Supreme Court election in 1986, when three sitting justices were ousted from the bench, and the 1992 execution of Robert Alton Harris. That gas chamber execution was the first time the death penalty was carried out in California in 25 years.
In her nine years as Metro Editor at the Union-Tribune, Hearn made watchdog reporting a priority. Her reporters produced award-winning investigations covering large and small local governments. The depth and breadth of their public service work was most evident in coverage of the wildfires of 2003 and then 2007, when more than half a million people were evacuated from their homes.
Managing Editor: Laura Wingard, laurawingard@inewsource.org
Laura Wingard is the managing editor at inewsource. She has been an editor in San Diego since 2002, working at The San Diego Union-Tribune, KPBS and now inewsource. At the Union-Tribune, she served in a variety of roles including as enterprise editor, government editor, public safety and legal affairs editor, and metro editor. She directed the newspaper’s award-winning coverage of the October 2007 wildfires and the 2010 disappearance of Poway teenager Chelsea King. She also oversaw reporting on San Diego’s pension crisis.
For two years, Wingard was news and digital editor at KPBS, overseeing a team of four multimedia reporters and two web producers. She also was the KPBS liaison with inewsource and collaborated with inewsource chief executive officer and editor Lorie Hearn on investigative work by both news organizations.
Wingard also worked at the Las Vegas Review-Journal as the city editor and as an award-winning reporter covering the environment and politics. She also was the assistant managing editor for metro at The Press-Enterprise in Riverside. She earned her bachelor’s degree at California State University, Fullerton, with a double major in communications/journalism and political science.
Assistant Editor and Senior Reporter: Brad Racino, bradracino@inewsource.org
Brad Racino is the assistant editor and a senior reporter at inewsource. He has produced investigations for print, radio and TV on topics including political corruption, transportation, health, maritime, education and nonprofits.
His cross-platform reporting for inewsource has earned more than 50 awards since 2012, including back-to-back national medals from Investigative Reporters and Editors, two national Edward R. Murrow awards, a Meyer “Mike” Berger award from New York City’s Columbia Journalism School, the Sol Price Award for Responsible Journalism, San Diego SPJ’s First Amendment Award, and a national Emmy nomination.
In 2017, Racino was selected by the Institute for Nonprofit News as one of 10 “Emerging Leaders” in U.S. nonprofit journalism.
Racino has worked as a reporter and database analyst for News21; as a photographer, videographer and reporter for the Columbia Missourian; as a project coordinator for the National Freedom of Information Coalition and as a videographer and editor for Verizon Fios1 TV in New York. He received his master’s degree in journalism from the University of Missouri in 2012.
Byline Policy
Most of our articles carry a byline to identify the author. In some cases, inewsource will use a brand byline such as “Staff” or “inewsource” for internal or editorial information about the newsroom. In these instances, inewsource‘s Editor and Managing Editor are responsible for content that uses a brand byline.
The Trust Project
inewsource is proud to be a member of The Trust Project and support efforts to increase transparency in journalism by displaying the 8 Trust Indicators on our stories. We launched the Trust Indicators on Sep. 16, 2020.
Privacy Policy
inewsource has prepared this Privacy Policy to explain how we collect, use, protect, and share information when you use our inewsource.org website (the “Site“) or when you use any of our services (the “Services“).
By using the Site or Services you consent to this Privacy Policy.
Log Data
Like many site operators, we collect information that your browser sends whenever you visit our site (“Log Data”).
This Log Data may include information such as your computer’s Internet Protocol (“IP”) address, browser type, browser version, the pages of our site that you visit, the time and date of your visit, the time spent on those pages and other statistics.
Cookies
Cookies are files with small amount of data, which may include an anonymous unique identifier. Cookies are sent to your browser from a web site and stored on your computer or mobile device.
Like many sites, we use “cookies” to collect information. You can instruct your browser to refuse all cookies or to indicate when a cookie is being sent. However, if you do not accept cookies, you may not be able to use some portions of our site.
Certain pages on our site may set other third party cookies. For example, we may embed content, such as videos, from another site that sets a cookie. While we try to minimize these third party cookies, we can’t always control what cookies this third party content sets.
Additionally, we may use third party services — such as those that provide social media conveniences, measure traffic, send newsletters and facilitate donations — that may place cookies on your computer. We don’t have any way of knowing how such services handle the resulting data internally. inewsource makes no claim, nor takes liability for the insecure submission of information via these applications.
Here are the services whose cookies you can find on inewsource.org:
- Sharing buttons for Facebook and Twitter. These use the standard scripts provided by each company.
- Google Analytics, which we use to measure site traffic. Google Analytics gathers certain non-personally identifying information over time, such as your IP address, browser type, internet service provider, referring and exit pages, time stamp, and similar data. We also use Facebook Pixel to measure, optimize and build audiences for advertising campaigns served on Facebook. In particular it enables us to see how our users move between devices when accessing our website and Facebook, to ensure that our Facebook advertising is seen by our users most likely to be interested in such advertising by analyzing which content a user has viewed and interacted with on our website.
- Stripe, which allows us to accept donations through our website.
- Salesforce to manage newsletter subscriber, donor, and other identifiable user data.
- Mailchimp, to manage newsletter distributions. We collect your email address if you choose to subscribe to one of our email newsletters or email news alerts. Other optional information that you enter when subscribing – such as your first and last names or city are simply so that we can deliver more personalized email newsletters. We DO NOT sell, rent or market your information to any other parties. We retain your information only as long as necessary to provide your service. When we send emails, it collects some data about which users open the emails and which links are clicked. We use this information to optimize our email newsletters and, as aggregate information, to explain what percentage of our users open and interact with our newsletters.
Personal Data
We only collect personally identifiable information such as your name and email address when you sign up for a newsletter, donate to our organization, or otherwise submit it to us voluntarily. We do not share your personal data with any third parties other than some common service providers, whose products use your information to help us improve our site, deliver newsletters, or allow us to offer donation opportunities.
inewsource limits access to all user data for the purposes of newsletter, fundraising, and customer service only. User data is not sold to or otherwise shared with anyone not working with or for the inewsource.
You may unsubscribe or opt-out of our email and mail communications at any time by hitting the “unsubscribe” button in any email you receive from inewsource, or by emailing us at contact@inewsource.org or calling us at 619-594-5100.
Donor Information
The identities of all donors will be listed on our website. inewsource does not share, trade, sell, or otherwise release donors’ personal information to any third parties.
Refunds
If you encounter errors when donating on the website, please contact us at members@inewsource.org. For example, if you submit a donation for an incorrect amount or make a duplicate transaction please email us immediately so we can reverse the charges.
Cancellation of Recurring Donations
You can cancel your monthly recurring donations free of charge by notifying us at members@inewsource.org.
Links to Other Websites
Our site may contain links to documents, resources or other websites that we think may be of interest to you. We have no control over these other sites or their content. You should be aware when you leave our site for another, and remember that other sites are governed by their own user agreements and privacy policies, which should be available to you to read.
Disclaimers and Limitation of Liability
Although we take reasonable steps to prevent the introduction of viruses, worms, “Trojan Horses” or other destructive materials to our site, we do not guarantee or warrant that our site or materials that may be downloaded from our site are free from such destructive features. We are not liable for any damages or harm attributable to such features. We are not liable for any claim, loss or injust based on errors, omissions, interruptions or other inaccuracies on our site, nor for any claim, loss or injust that results from your use of this site or your breach of any provision of this User Agreement.
Contact Us
If there are any questions regarding this privacy policy, please contact us at contact@inewsource.org or call us at 619-594-5100.
Type of Content
News: Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Article Post Types
postType of Content
News: Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.