edited by Lorie Hearn | inewsource
Directors of the San Diego Opera will meet today to address mounting concern among some on the board that they did not have adequate information — including an investigation of the opera’s management tactics — before voting two weeks ago to shutter the venerable institution.
Sources on the board and opera staff told KPBS they did not have the full picture of expenses, liabilities, or the results of a legal investigation that was prompted by a claim alleging a hostile work environment.
A group of board members say they hope to convince a majority of the directors to “hit the pause button,” and rethink the decision to disband the company. In a letter, they have requested more than two dozens documents.
David Kleinfeld, who was the single vote against closing the 49-year-old opera company, said he is one of the directors insisting on more answers.
“A decision like this cannot be made under the circumstances that evolved last week,” said Kleinfeld. “We need to take a deliberate look and exhaustively understand what the reasons were for proposing this. That has not been adequately explained.”
Hopes for saving the opera extend beyond those board members.
A petition has almost 18,000 signatures. A White Knight Committee, made up of opera staff, union members, seasonal employees, vendors and supporters has organized to encourage the board to rescind their vote.
KPBS spoke with or reached out to more than 20 people in an attempt to probe the reasons behind the opera’s sudden announcement to cease operations. Most didn’t want to be quoted by name because they worry about retaliation and future job prospects. Some hope there’s still a chance to “right the ship” and “save face.”
Karen Cohn, the opera’s board president, did not respond to a KPBS request for comment, but in a commentary published in U-T San Diego yesterday, she strongly defended the opera’s action and reprimanded critics.
“The San Diego Opera Board’s decision to shutter San Diego Opera after the 2014 season was the result of years of deliberation as we watched an inexorable trend sweeping toward us. Very simply, dwindling financial support indicated an irrefutable decline in appetite for grand opera in San Diego,” she wrote.
“…. Now that the decision has been made, the conspiracy theorists have emerged, casting totally incorrect aspersions on two key staff leaders,” she wrote, apparently referring to opera General Director Ian Campbell and his ex-wife Ann, the deputy general director. “Those aspersions are wrong, they are damaging and they are unforgivable.”
The board voted on March 19 to shut down the opera and sell off its assets. The action, approved 33-1, would put hundreds out of work. The union representing solo and chorus singers and stage management personnel has challenged the action in a grievance filed with the National Labor Relations Board.
For the community, closure means little to no opera in San Diego city and county.
The vote to cease operations took some board members by surprise. In past meetings, there was plenty of discussion about fundraising troubles and shrinking audiences, but no talk of an immediate shut-down. Just two weeks before the vote, Ian Campbell attended a regular board meeting to talk up the 50th anniversary season in 2015.
The concerned board members have sent a letter to board president Cohn and Campbell requesting documents, including compensation packages, calendar appointments with donors, and performance reviews.
A vote to cease operations was not listed on the March 19 special meeting agenda. Before making the decision, board members were given a one-sheet explainer with a colored graph.
Board members who spoke with KPBS say there should have been months of discussion about company liabilities, reduced costs, and new programming possibilities before casting such a momentous vote.
They also question whether the vote to close the operation is valid if board members (there are 58) weren’t given enough notice for the “special meeting.”
One of the items board members did not have prior to voting was access to a recent investigation into the management style of the Campbells.
In mid-February, legal counsel investigated a hostile work environment claim and determined the incident did not meet the necessary legal criteria for such a claim, said sources on the opera staff.
However, the incident led to a broader inquiry by a new lawyer, who was appointed by Faye Wilson, a board member with the title Life Director. That lawyer interviewed seven staff members. Nic Reveles, Geisel Director for Education and Outreach, was one of them.
Reveles, 66, who has been with the opera 16 years, described top management as “closed, unwilling to dialogue, a top-down management style, and micromanaging.”
He, among others, was disappointed when the report appeared to go nowhere.
“Our understanding was there would be a report presented to the board about management style,” said Reveles. “And we waited and waited and there was no report.”
In his interview with the investigator, Reveles said he talked about how open dialogue is necessary to reinvent the opera for changing audiences and troubled financial times. “We’ve got to have a new vision of what opera in San Diego is going to be,” he said.
No traction for new ideas
Staff sources frustrated with Ian Campbell’s management style are conflicted when describing the man who, 30 years ago, took a financially-strapped operation and built a world-class opera company. They say he’s an artistic genius, a mentor, and has taught them everything they know about opera. They also say he’s heavy-handed and combustible.
Staff said they shared concerns about the Campbells’ refusal to entertain new ideas or consider ways to reach new audiences.
Insiders gave KPBS examples of ideas that the Campbells shot down, ideas like staging populist operas such as “Anna Nicole” and flash mobs.
Even changes to the “no late seating” policy — a long-standing policy that late-comers cannot be seated until intermission — were dismissed.
Reveles said as traffic in San Diego increased, more people arrive late to the opera, and they were frustrated to miss a major portion of the performance. It was suggested at a meeting that the “no late seating” policy be reconsidered. The staff was told the policy stands, end of discussion.
Ian Campbell did not respond to multiple interview requests, but in her commentary yesterday, Cohn alluded to the push for new ideas — and why some would not work.
“We are about world-class grand opera. For 49 years, the San Diego Opera delivered increasingly acclaimed world-class grand opera with internationally renowned singers. That is what our subscribers enjoyed and what our philanthropists supported,” she wrote. “Neither audience was particularly in the market for alternative or radically new programming.”
Sources told KPBS they were honest in their description of working for the Campbells during the investigation in the hope that the leadership would consider new ways to run the company. When the report never appeared, they say they felt duped and feared repercussions. Just weeks later, they learned the company was closing.
Abby Silverman Weiss, the lawyer who conducted the investigation, did not respond to an interview request.
In her op-ed, Cohn said the Campbells had the most to lose from the opera’s closure:
“They are soon to be out of work, without benefits, with reputations sullied by unfounded allegations and diminished future prospects. That is unfair. They could have ‘jumped ship’ before now, but their integrity made them want to do everything they could to avoid it. They deserve gratitude and respect.”
Critics inside the opera and out have questioned the opera’s expenses and whether it did enough to curtail them. The compensation packages for the Campbells have been central.
A lawyer representing the opera company denied a Public Records Act request from KPBS seeking copies of key operational documents, such as the investigation’s report, internal board documents, and employee compensation packages and expense reports.
KPBS later obtained the employment agreements. (link) They show Ian Campbell’s current contract, which went into effect in May 2006, extends through 2017.
In addition to compensation, which can be adjusted by the board of directors annually, the agreement provides for health and retirement benefits, as well as a car.
Ann Campbell’s contract was signed by Ian Campbell in February 2013. Benefits include health care and a car paid for by the opera.
The Campbells’ combined compensation was highest in 2009-10, at more than $1 million, according to tax returns filed by the opera association. The total decreased to $992,759 in 2010-11; it fell further to $790,366 in 2011-12, the latest year the tax filings are available.
In media interviews, Campbell said he’s paid for performing two roles, general director and artistic director. Some tax filings show Campbell’s two positions, equally compensated.
But Marc Scorca, president of Opera America, a national umbrella organization, said most general directors are equally responsible for the business side and the artistic side of the operation. Those duties are combined, he said, under the title “general director.”
Scorca said proportionate to the size of the company’s budget, “Campbell is the most highly compensated general director among our largest opera companies.” There are general directors with higher salaries, but their companies are much larger, he explained via email.
Declining revenue, sapping investments
Over the years, Scorca has pointed to San Diego Opera as a model of health, presenting opera of the highest standards.
In a recent interview on the KPBS radio show Midday Edition, Campbell said San Diego Opera was committed to high-quality, grand opera. That is expensive and the greatest expense, he said, is the labor.
Campbell has noted repeatedly that the opera has been in the black for 28 years. In order to remain consistently so, the company has drawn down its investments. In 2003, they received a $10 million bequest from Joan Kroc to spend on producing “Olympic quality opera” according to Campbell. Many say that’s exactly what Campbell did.
“We cannot lose sight of the wonderful accomplishments of Ann and Ian Campbell that we’ve all benefited from,” said Kleinfeld, the one board member who voted against closure. “I will express gratitude now and forever for what they have accomplished. At the same time I’ll do the best I can to right mistakes that I think are being made.”
The opera has roughly $15 million in assets. Those include property, like the San Diego Opera Scenic Studio on Commercial Ave, and costumes, some of which were designed by Zandra Rhodes, a locally based fashion designer with an international reputation. Those assets will be sold off after April 14th, including the sets from “Don Quixote,” the company’s last production.
Campbell said despite some surplus and no debt, the company does not have a viable future. Ticket sales have consistently dropped and donors have stopped giving.
“When I hear people say that we blew up a budget, no we did not,” said Campbell on KPBS Midday Edition. “We brought it down significantly and the problem is a revenue issue not an expense issue.”
Carlos Cota, who is with the union for stagehands and scenic design, said more could be done to cut expenses. The union was never approached to cut costs before the board vote, he said, adding the union is more than willing to negotiate, including on salary.
But the opera company also needs to look at other kinds of cuts, he said.
“They’re in a beautiful office downtown, right next to the Civic Theater,” said Cota. “If we’re asked to take some cuts, let’s talk about moving into a smaller office, something a little more conservative.”
The opera’s offices are 15,000 square feet. Rent is just under $450,000 a year.
Reveles said pay cuts were discussed, but, “We were told ‘oh, that’s not a road you want to go down,’” he said.
“I think it was exactly the road we needed to go down,” he said.
Sources say what would really make a difference is smaller, less expensive, more innovative ways to present opera.
Attempt at reinvention
In 2013, a new board president, Stacy Rosenberg, set up a strategic-planning committee to look at innovations in opera programming and business models. Scorca, of Opera America, attended a board retreat that summer. “We spoke a lot about the creative energies at other opera companies and people were very intrigued by it,” said Scorca.
“When I spend a day with a board to do strategic planning, it’s really to launch what I hope will be a continuing discussion about possibilities with the company,” explained Scorca.
According to sources, that didn’t happen. Rosenberg, who did not respond to interview requests, resigned from the board. Board leadership quickly disbanded the strategic-planning committee. The focus, sources say, returned to raising money.
In recent years, several opera companies have shut down. Others have reinvented themselves.
The Fort Worth Opera presents its season in an 8-week festival format. According to the general director, Darren Woods, they’ve reached new audiences through programs like “Opera Shots.” Opera singers perform in local bars in front of hundreds – for the price of a beer.
Fort Worth also does site-specific chamber operas out in the community.
In his KPBS interview, Campbell said smaller, chamber operas are not what San Diego audiences want.
“It’s too easy to assume that what your inner circle thinks is what the entire audience thinks,” said Scorca. He said you have to do those operas to really find out if there’s an appetite for them.
Whether San Diego Opera will have a chance to experiment is still up in the air.
Nic Reveles is encouraged by the support demonstrated by those signing petitions.
“I can’t imagine life without opera,” said Reveles. “It’s what I do. It’s what I’ve dedicated my life to, and I’m not about to change that.”
The one thing that is plain from Ms. Cohn and Mr. Campbell’s statements in the public record is that they are woefully out of touch with the world around them. Step aside and let people who still care try and do something.
First of all allow me to Respond to Karen Cohn: She stated, “They are soon to be out of work, without benefits, with reputations sullied by unfounded allegations and diminished future prospects. That is unfair. They could have ‘jumped ship’ before now, but their integrity made them want to do everything they could to avoid it.They deserve gratitude and respect.”
I will grant that they may be deserving of gratitude and possibly respect, otherwise they are hardy the waifs cast out into the street that Ms. Cohn paints them as. Ian Campbell’s severance package is approximately $2,000,000 and his ex wife (signed on by him) would receive over $1,100,000. Ian Campbell is 67, and for nearly half of his life he has been paid very, very well (At times over $1,000,000 a year) by the San Diego Opera (and even been given a car!) I hardly think that we will find either of the Campbells wandering homeless on the streets any time in the foreseeable future.
“Reputations sullied…” – How and why? Is there something Ms. Cohn knows that we don’t. A number of opera companies have closed in recent years without “sullying” the reputations of their Directors. Unless there is something yet to be known, why has Cohn made such a remark?Or are the circumstances surrounding San Diego Opera’s closure that transparent that she assumes their reputation will be sullied. Besides with the engorged salaries that they have been paid, and with the compensation they are receiving, I doubt that finding a “new” job will be an immediate concern.
“jumped Ship?” Isn’t that exactly what the Cambells are doing here? Jumping ship and taking the lifeboat along with them, while leaving everyone else on board? They can easily continue their lifestyle in the aftermath. That may not be the case for the hundreds of workers and dozens of businesses that receive at least a portion of their annual income from the Opera.
Ian Campbell arrived at the San Diego Opera 30 years ago as an energetic 37(?) year old with fresh ideas that made the San Diego Opera what it is today. Where is his protege? The current 37 year old with fresh new ideas that may be the future of this world class organization. Last year the Opera presented “Cruzar la Cara de la Luna,” a “mariachi” opera that played to sold out audiences! Where are those presentations now? Were any even considered for the proposed future seasons (often planned four and five years in advance)? Classical Opera can be wonderful, but with a modern audience a few “modern” productions might be in line as well. Apparently Ian Campbell sees no future in anything but “Old School” opera, and is even inflexible in outreach programs.(“In his KPBS interview, Campbell said smaller, chamber operas are not what San Diego audiences want.”) Perhaps this inflexibility is the reason that the opera is in it’s current state, and that is perhaps why the Protege is needed more than the master at this point. The master has reached his pinnacle and is on the down-slide, the protege may have new answers, such as the master found 30 years ago. Ian Campbell has done his part for the San Diego Opera, perhaps it is truly time for him to proceed to his emeritus years and allow some fresh blood in to revive an ailing organization – without taking the bank with him..
In the long term, what harm would be done by simply “putting on the brakes” and hold on the selling-out of the opera on such short notice. Even a year-long moratorium to pause and consider alternatives would not significantly change the Opera’s current condition, so why the rush, Ian?
It is simply unconscionable to shut down a company when your top 2 executives are pulling in nearly $1 million in compensation. Ridiculous.
There are plenty of excellent arts administrators who would work for HALF of that salary. Is SD Opera really telling us that they couldn’t find someone to run the company for the paltry sum of $250 or 300k??
In addition, it’s absurd to pay lead performers $19k per performance when your company is in financial jeopardy. Again, there are plenty of EXCELLENT opera singers who would sing the roles for significantly less than that.
In addition there are MANY ways to cut costs even before you get to the point of scaling down your productions.
– Move to smaller/cheaper offices,
– Cut your administrative overhead.
– Negotiate with the unions over ways to cut costs.
– Hire domestic singers. You can still do a great opera production even without an international “star”. There is almost no role that can only be sung by one person.
This is a classic case of insular thinking and selfishness.
Furthermore, there is simply no excuse for this when other arts organizations in San Diego have experienced an uptick in ticket sales and philanthropy.
Thank you Angela Carone and KPBS for this excellent article. Nic Reveles’ characterization of the mindset driving SDO, the background on the failed Strategic Planning effort, and the posted employment agreements really explain a lot about how the company came to this point. Let us pray the full Board takes a deep look into itself, rescinds the vote, embraces change, tightens its belt, and starts innovating!
Ian Campbell has confessed to being a liar whose management has led an important charitable institution to dissolution. HIs defense from the start has been that Opera is a sick dog that needs to be put down, through no fault of his own, it just happened. And he lied only to protect the feelings of those who still loved the dog and wouldn’t understand. The trouble with the talk about the future of Opera, is that distracts from the issue here, money.
The presented figures say the Opera is millions in the black, but the management says it can’t make next year’s payroll. Both facts can’t be true. Experience tells us the money must be gone, trying to sell this as an artistic decision is idiotic. The issue now is the disposal of the Opera’s remaining assets, and trying to preserve those a new company needs for San Diego. If Board and Management have any decency, they would turn over this task to new people, just as in a bankruptcy. I don’t expect them to, I suspect they have another scheme.
Campbell says it’s revenue, not expenses. That’s a mind-boggling cop out. What do people who have more going out than coming in do??? THEY CUT EXPENSES.!!!! He doesn’t want to do the work ~ he loves his legacy of ‘grand opera’ more than he values all the fans, workers and people assocaited with opera … he doesn’t really give a damn about the opera, only his myopic view of it. For the board president to say he and Ann will be out of jobs … ridiculous ~ they’ve milked the opera’s EXPENSES for decades ~ they’re fine~!!! It’s all the staffers, artists and musicians who will be out of jobs! The Campbells have bled the opera dry, and now they’d like to ‘go out with dignity?’ Disgusting, outrageous and appalling, and so is the [word removed] board, if they let themselves be further bullied. Come on people, man up … let Mr. Kleinfeld drive this bus!!
Note: This comment has been edited to remove profanity.
Mr. Shuttleworth, I applaud you! I LOVED the mariachi opera! As I crossed the street afterwards, glowing with that performance, Ian Campbell passed by me. Shouting a congratulatory huzzah to him, he turned and uttered a response that I cannot print here, but essentially offering a seething comment about how low brow and disgusting it had all been, and how glad he was to be rid of it. The staff begged him to do at least two performances, but he was adamant that one was more than he ever wanted to do. MANY San Diegans were denied the opportunity to see that lovey production because of his ‘grand opera’ arrogance.
I’m throwing my two cents into this picture. The top brass here has been emblematic of the their generation to milk any industry they’re in and leave ashes and smoke behind. Ian Campbell and his wife can live a very very luxurious life from here on out directly from the years of skimming the cream of the milk of the SDO. I’ve met him years ago as an aspiring opera singer and found him self righteous and an egotistical jerk. The many in the administration made it difficult to nurture new and budding artists. And my friends who’ve worked in the administration offices can attest to the same kind of treatment. There’s extraordinary talent on and off the stage to make this happen. Sadly raping the coffers of the program seems a trickle down economical debacle that’s put SD into this conundrum. Take a bow Mr. Campbell to that empty audience. Enjoy the endless champagne of this demise. You disgust me.
I think the Campbell’s are crooks and need to be put on the street!!!!
Lamborghini, champagne, and opera do not come cheap
Before embarking on the road to a democratic (oxymoron) opera, consider the plight of the San Diego Lyric Opera (http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2011/Oct/14/lyric-opera-file-bankruptcy-protection/).
And about this shiny think tank idea, look no further than Lindbergh Field (http://www.sandiegomagazine.com/San-Diego-Magazine/May-2005/No-Deja-Vu-Its-Airport-Relocation-Redux/)
or Balboa Park (http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/Mar/04/bpci-balboa-park-party-group-disbands/).
There is something in the SoCal air that rots committees in the
Comments are closed.