by Angela Carone | KPBS
edited by Lorie Hearn | inewsource
The San Diego Opera’s contracts with general director Ian Campbell and his ex-wife Ann may be one of the company’s biggest liabilities.
But the former head of the nonprofits division of the IRS told KPBS that it’s not just the potential for severance payouts that could be legally problematic.
The Campbells’ contracts are quite generous, said Marcus Owens, former IRS official who now practices law in Washington, D.C. “I think the state attorney general will be giving the organization a call soon,” he said.
The opera board will meet this afternoon in what some directors and staff see as a last-ditch effort to make a new way forward before the April 29th deadline for selling off the assets and closing the doors.
Catch up on our ongoing investigation into the San Diego Opera by clicking here
A group of board members hopes to convince fellow directors to rescind the vote to close the company. Among them will be Carol Lazier, a board member, who pledged $1 million to the cause, and flew to Dallas last weekend to discuss ways to reinvent the company with leaders of other opera organizations.
Meanwhile, local opera management is regrouping.
Board president Karen Cohn sent out what she called a “manifesto” Thursday citing the opera’s commitment to transparency and a pledge to review alternatives for the company as quickly as possible. The opera posted a library of documents on it s website, such as 990s, bylaws and audits.
It includes a letter from the opera’s attorney, saying he has advised the opera not to pay any severance to the Campbells if the opera closes and enters into a formal legal liquidation process. Instead, he said they will have to get in line with other unsecured creditors, such as the singers who have contracts with the company.
“They [opera directors] should stop the clock ticking on this April deadline because no person or organization makes good decisions under pressure,” said Pat Libby, director of University of San Diego’s Nonprofit Institute. Ann Campbell taught fundraising in the program for many years and Libby considers her a friend.
Earlier this week, Cohn sent a memo to staff and board saying an Operations Team of five, including herself and the Campbells, would be making decisions and public statements for the company.
In 2011-12, the opera board approved changing the definition of a quorum to 10, even though there are more than 50 members. That troubles Owens, the former IRS official.
“That’s extraordinary,” said Owens. “It appears that the structure is designed to facilitate control by a small group of people, and there is a small group of people who seem to be deriving extraordinary benefits from the organization.”
Unless the clock is stopped, assets will be sold off and debts settled. The opera has roughly $15 million in assets. Who is first in line to get paid will be determined by an assignee, a third party who will manage the sale of the assets and then pay the creditors according to legal priorities. [pullquote]”…there is a small group of people who seem to be deriving extraordinary benefits from the organization.”[/pullquote]
Secured creditors (mortgages, etc) are paid first, then unsecured creditors, which includes the singer contracts and employee contracts. The American Guild of Musical Artists (AGMA), the union that represents solo singers and chorus members, has at least 35 contracts with San Diego Opera, for seasons as far out as 2017. The union has started the legal process for having the opera company’s assets frozen to ensure their singers get paid.
The Campbells’ compensation packages have been center stage in the weeks since the opera board voted to cease operations of the 49-year-old company.
The contracts specify base pay, health and retirement benefits and cars. Supplemental retirement benefits and executive health care after retirement are also mentioned.
The Campbells’ combined base pay alone exceeded $1 million in 2009-2010.
Owens, a lawyer who spent 10 years heading the nonprofit division of the IRS, questions the scope of the benefit packages.
“When I look at the employment agreements, which contain some extraordinary provisions, and I look at the latest 990, (the opera’s tax return), what I see is an organization that has entered into some very generous compensation agreements with two people and not with anyone else,” said Owens, who is with the law firm of Caplin and Drysdale in Washington, D.C.
Owens and other experts in nonprofit management who spoke to KPBS also questioned the fact that Ian Campbell signed his ex-wife’s contract as deputy director in 2013. There is no clause in her contract stating that her former husband should not be involved in her performance evaluations or contract negotiations.
“When you have a relationship like that you want to take as many precautions as possible to make sure it is squeaky clean,” said USD’s Libby. “The more people who know about the process and the contract as possible in the organization, the better.”
When the IRS tests for reasonableness of compensation, Owens said, they look not only at benefits to individuals but also those going to family units. The Campbells were married for 27 years. They divorced in March, 2013.
Federal laws governing charities are in place to make sure the assets of an organization are not used for the benefit of those who run it, Owens explained. These include rules that require a nonprofit to conduct salary comparison studies for its most highly compensated employees.
Charities need to operate exclusively for charitable purposes, otherwise an organization can lose its tax-exempt status, which provides a key incentive to contributors.
“There are federal tax laws looming here given the benefits and compensation paid to the general director and the deputy general director,” said Owens.
Here are key provisions of the Campbells’ compensation:
Ian Campbell’s Base Pay
Campbell has worked at the opera for 30 years. His current contract, signed in 2006, calls for a base salary of $365,000 to be paid through December 2017. From 2015 through 2017 that’s nearly $1.5 million.
The opera’s 990 tax forms indicate Campbell has received raises over the years. For example, according to tax filings for 2011-12, the latest available, Campbell’s salary was $508,021. Whatever his salary is now, that is what he will be paid through 2017, according to the contract.
If it’s still $508,021, that’s at least a $2 million liability for the company.
Campbell’s raises are supposed to be decided by the six-member compensation committee. That committee is chaired by longtime board member Faye Wilson, an expert in corporate business management and a “Life Director” of the opera.
Sources with first-hand knowledge of opera finances told KPBS that Wilson is the only person who reviews Campbell’s compensation. Wilson and the Campbells are close friends.
Tax laws require the company measure the general director’s salary and compensation package every three years against those of his counterparts at organizations of comparable size and in similar markets. The company has to report that information to the IRS, which the opera did in two sections of its 2011 tax forms.
The compensation committee has yet to provide meeting minutes to a group of board members or to KPBS, both of whom have asked for a list of financial and governance documents.
Marc Scorca, president of Opera America, a national umbrella organization, said proportionate to the size of the company’s budget, “Campbell is the most highly compensated general director among our largest opera companies.” Some general directors have higher salaries, but their companies are much larger.
inewsource compiled compensation data from the tax returns of opera companies across the country that are comparable by various measures to the San Diego opera.
Campbell’s total compensation was $508,021 in 2011, making him the second-highest paid employee among the six operas analyzed. Ann Campbell was the second-highest paid employee at the San Diego opera with total compensation of $282,345.
inewsource found that San Diego Opera spent a total of $1,712,518 in compensations for directors, officers and key employees listed on the tax forms, slightly more than the Houston Grand Opera’s $1,706,859, San Diego opera employed 406 individuals during 2011, fewer than half of the 825 employees at the Houston Grand Opera.
Other benefits
-
Campbell is eligible for “executive” health care after his retirement. That figure will likely be determined by an actuary who will decide on a dollar amount based on health information and life expectancy.
-
The company is required to make premium payments for two life insurance policies, totaling $1 million in death benefits, through 2017.
-
They will also pay the premium on his retirement fund through 2017. The policy pays Campbell $107,000, tax free, per year beginning in March of 2012 for a period of 15 years, totally $1.6 million. If the retirement payments take a hit on the markets and fall below the agreed $107,000, the company has to make up the difference. That adds to the liability.
-
The Opera company purchased an Audi for Campbell in 2003. His contract says the opera will pay for insurance, maintenance and operating costs.
Campbell’s contract will be looked at far more closely as the company winds down and dollar figures will be attached to some of the clauses. Owens said the amount of money Campbell would stand to gain “is significant enough that he could afford to hire an attorney and sue if he doesn’t get what he wants.”
Ann Campbell’s Employment Agreement
-
Ann Campbell’s employment agreement, signed and approved by Ian Campbell in 2013, provides for base compensation of $280,513.
-
She has a company car, close to seven weeks annual vacation, and when she leaves, she’ll receive 18 months of her base salary, just over $400,000.
Owens said, “Eighteen months is pretty darn generous … Normally people are paid three months or six months.”
-
The agreement calls for reimbursement of “all reasonable expenses.” It contains no details, and the opera has refused to provide inewsource with expense accounts and credit card payments requested for the past five years.
Ann Campbell is also eligible for a supplemental executive retirement plan.
The Campbells’ employment agreements both contain “kick-out” clauses. If either is fired “for cause” then their benefits are dramatically reduced.
inewsource investigative assistants Emily Burns and Leo Castaneda contributed to this report.
- Editorial Standards Page
- Ethics Policy
- Diversity Statement
- Diversity Staffing Report
- Corrections Policy
- Ownership Structure, Funding
- Founding Date
- Masthead
- Mission Statement with Coverage Priorities
- Fact-checking Standards
- Unnamed Sources Policy
Editorial Standards Page
- Our Mission
- Ethics Policy
- Diversity
- Ownership Structure, Funding and Grants
- Financial Documents
- Fact-checking and Verification Standards
- Unnamed Sources
- Corrections and Clarifications
- Actionable Feedback and Newsroom Contacts
- Masthead
- Byline Policy
- The Trust Project
- Privacy Policy
Our Mission
inewsource is a nonprofit, nonpartisan newsroom dedicated to improving lives in the San Diego region and beyond through impactful, data-based investigative and accountability journalism.
Our Vision
Betrayals of the public trust are revealed and rectified, wrongdoing is deterred, and inequities are illuminated thanks to inewsource’s deep, dogged, fact-based reporting.
Our Values
Truth: Above all else, we value the importance of a free and credible press. Truth is the cornerstone of democracy and the core value for inewsource.
Transparency: We build trust with our readers by adhering to the highest standards and ethics, and to reporting with facts, precision and context.
Collaboration: Our newsroom prioritizes collaboration over competition. We regularly partner with media outlets on reporting projects and to share content.
Community: Our reporting serves the San Diego region, and we strive to build relationships with our audience by getting out into the community to listen and engage.
Ethics Policy
inewsource will conduct its business with the highest standards of decency, fairness and accuracy. These standards shall apply equally to inewsource employees, freelancers and all others engaged in gathering information on behalf of inewsource. All receive a copy of these ethical standards.
In the course of our reporting, we will consistently:
● Identify our organization and ourselves fully and avoid false representations of any kind to any source.
● Obtain consent from all parties before electronically recording any interview or conversation except in extraordinary cases authorized by the Managing Editor and Editor. If a source refuses to be taped, that must be honored; no recordings are to be made without consent.
● Respect the individual’s right to privacy. inewsource will never manipulate or barter private, personal, health, financial or other extraneous information in the course of preparing its reports.
● Any source we describe or write about in any significant manner must be contacted. The employee should document all efforts to contact the source, and if unsuccessful, should summarize these efforts at contact in the body of his/her writing.
In addition, inewsource follows the Code of Ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists. The latest version, revised in 2014, can be found here.
Editorial Independence Policy
We subscribe to standards of editorial independence adopted by the Institute for Nonprofit News (INN) as follows:
Our organization retains full authority over editorial content to protect the best journalistic and business interests of our organization. We will maintain a firewall between news coverage decisions and sources of all revenue. Acceptance of financial support does not constitute implied or actual endorsement of donors or their products, services or opinions.
We accept gifts, grants and sponsorships from individuals and organizations for the general support of our activities, but our news judgments are made independently and not on the basis of donor support. Our organization also may consider donations to support the coverage of particular topics, but our organization maintains editorial control of the coverage. We will cede no right of review or influence of editorial content, nor of unauthorized distribution of editorial content.
Our organization will make public all donors who give a total of $1,000 or more. We will accept anonymous donations for general support only if it is clear that sufficient safeguards have been put into place that the expenditure of that donation is made independently by our organization and in compliance with INN’s Membership Standards.
Diversity
Diverse Voices
Inclusiveness is at the heart of thinking and acting as journalists, and it supports the educational mandate of inewsource. Race, class, generation, gender, sexual orientation, ability, and geography all affect point of view. inewsource believes that reflecting societal differences in reporting leads to better, more nuanced stories and a better-informed community.
inewsource is committed to employment equity and diversity.
Diverse Staffing Report
Below is a breakdown of staffing data at inewsource. We determine the composition of our staff by asking them to self-identify. It is based on a newsroom of 11 and a total staff of 15 as of August 2020. Percentages are based on 15 total survey responses. The numbers include full-time and part-time staff, full-time fellows and full-time and part-time interns.
| All Staff Percentages are based on 15 total survey responses. The numbers include full-time and part-time staff, full-time fellows and full-time and part-time interns. | Newsroom Percentages are based on 15 completed survey responses to this question. | Business Percentages are based on 15 completed survey responses to this question. | |||
| Gender Identity | Gender Identity | Gender Identity | |||
| Women | 80% | Women | 82% | Women | 75% |
| Men | 20% | Men | 18% | Men | 25% |
| Sexual Orientation | Sexual Orientation | Sexual Orientation | |||
| Straight | 87% | Straight | 82% | Straight | 100% |
| LGBTQ-identifying | 7% | LGBTQ-identifying | 7% | ||
| Not specified | 7% | Not specified | 7% | ||
| Speak a language beyond English at home | 33% | Speak a language beyond English at home | 18% | Speak a language beyond English at home | 75% |
| Race/Ethnicity | Race/Ethnicity | Race/Ethnicity | |||
| White | 67% | White | 73% | White | 50% |
| Hispanic or Latinx | 20% | Two or more races | 18% | Hispanic or Latinx | 50% |
| Two or more races | 13% | Hispanic or Latinx | 9% | ||
| Age | Age | Age | |||
| 20-29 | 40% | 20-29 | 45% | 20-29 | 25% |
| 30-39 | 47% | 30-39 | 45% | 30-39 | 50% |
| 60 or older | 13% | 60 or older | 9% | 60 or older | 25% |
* The percentages in the charts have been rounded and may not add up to 100.
Ownership Structure, Funding and Grants
inewsource is a nonprofit organization, whose legal name is Investigative Newsource. It does business as inewsource. The business was incorporated on Aug. 4, 2009 in the state of California. Tax-exempt status as a 501c3 was granted by the IRS on Sept. 15, 2010. inewsource is funded primarily by individual contributions and foundation grants. We are guided by a board of directors.
Editorial independence: Journalists employed by inewsource take no editorial direction from donors whose contributions may support the organization. inewsource will not hesitate to report on its donors when events warrant. Our Editorial Independence Policy details the firewall between journalism and revenue.
To be transparent with the public, inewsource lists its donors on its website. In cases where a donor is the subject of an inewsource story, additional disclosure will be made.
Financial Documents
We do our due diligence to earn your trust in our reporting, as well as in our governance and financial sustainability. All of our financial documents are made available to view so that our supporters can trust we are sound stewards of your philanthropy. Review our IRS Form 990s, audited financial statements and annual reports:
Tax Returns
Financial Statements
Annual Reports
Fact-checking and Verification Standards
Transparency is one of our core values. Today, there is a need to build trust with our audience because new media and ways of communicating spread lies and slanted news faster than “real” news. At the same time, this era of new technologies makes it easier than ever for news organizations to be transparent. People don’t just have to believe us, they can investigate our investigations with our source materials.
Transparency is key to building credibility.
inewsource reporters have primary responsibility for reporting, writing, and fact-checking their stories. But before a story is published, the reporter reviews all facts and sources with an editor or another reporter. Facts must be traced to a primary source.
In addition, we “transparify” certain investigative stories. This process involves publishing a version of the web story with hyperlinks to all the story’s facts. This is proof that all facts have been documented with primary evidence. We do this to build trust with our readers and to be as transparent as we hope the public figures and institutions that we hold accountable will be.
Unnamed Sources
Not all sources are created equal. Some sources cannot speak authoritatively, provide proper analysis or speak specifically to every inquiry placed before them. To maintain the integrity of our reporting, inewsource reporters must select sources who can speak with validity to the topic at hand, and avoid presenting unqualified or underqualified sources as experts.
If an interviewed source has a conflict of interest, or whose qualifications may be tangential or limited, reporters will note that within the context of the story.
It is incumbent upon reporters to fully background their sources to uncover conflicts of interest or slant prior to using them in a story.
Unless discussed prior to an interview, all subjects talking to inewsource journalists are on the record. Specifically, the source is identified by name and title, and their exact or paraphrased words are attributed to them for publication. If journalists speak with sources who are not politicians, public figures or those not commonly interviewed by journalists, staff should explain clearly that information discussed will be on the record and for publication.
There are times, however, when information may be critical for a story but cannot be found or verified by other means. For example, a source may be able to confirm specific information about a series of events they may have witnessed, but have legitimate concerns about using their name or title. The repercussions to the source could be legal, job-related retribution or personal safety. The source and journalist must discuss these potential dangers and terms of use should be agreed upon by both parties.
If inewsource publishes information from an anonymous source, inewsource will explain to readers, in as much detail as possible, why we agreed to anonymity.
Corrections and Clarifications
inewsource strives for accuracy in everything we do, which is why we are committed to fact checking our content. But sometimes we make errors. When that happens, we correct them. We also clarify stories when something we’ve written is confusing or could be misinterpreted.
We endeavor to always be transparent about our commitment to correcting errors and clarifying misperceptions. When staffers see, hear or read about a possible issue with the accuracy of any inewsource content, they are expected to bring it to the attention of an editor and the web producer so it can be evaluated to determine how to proceed.
Including the web producer is key because inewsource is a multimedia news organization and shares its content with multiple partners on multiple platforms. The web producer must alert these partners about corrections and clarifications.
Corrections and clarifications should be included at the bottom of stories and dated.
Actionable Feedback and Newsroom Contacts
Our audiences know the region we cover and have a stake in maintaining and improving the quality of life in San Diego and Imperial counties. We know your knowledge and insights can help shape what we cover and how we cover it. We invite your comments and complaints on news stories, suggestions for issues to cover or sources to consult. We rely on you to tell us when we get it right and when we need to keep pushing.
Your comments, questions and suggestions can be sent to the team as a whole at contact@inewsource.org or you can contact a specific member of our staff.
Masthead
CEO, Editor and Founder: Lorie Hearn, loriehearn@inewsource.org
Lorie Hearn is the chief executive officer, editor and founder of inewsource. She founded inewsource in the summer of 2009, following a successful reporting and editing career in newspapers. She retired from The San Diego Union-Tribune, where she had been a reporter, Metro Editor and finally the senior editor for Metro and Watchdog Journalism. In addition to department oversight, Hearn personally managed a four-person watchdog team, composed of two data specialists and two investigative reporters. Hearn was a Nieman Foundation fellow at Harvard University in 1994-95. She focused on juvenile justice and drug control policy, a natural course to follow her years as a courts and legal affairs reporter at the San Diego Union and then the Union-Tribune.
Hearn became Metro Editor in 1999 and oversaw regional and city news coverage, which included the city of San Diego’s financial debacle and near bankruptcy. Reporters and editors on Metro during her tenure were part of the Pulitzer Prize-winning stories that exposed Congressman Randy “Duke” Cunningham and led to his imprisonment.
Hearn began her journalism career as a reporter for the Bucks County Courier Times, a small daily outside of Philadelphia, shortly after graduating from the University of Delaware. During the decades following, she moved through countless beats at five newspapers on both coasts.
High-profile coverage included the historic state Supreme Court election in 1986, when three sitting justices were ousted from the bench, and the 1992 execution of Robert Alton Harris. That gas chamber execution was the first time the death penalty was carried out in California in 25 years.
In her nine years as Metro Editor at the Union-Tribune, Hearn made watchdog reporting a priority. Her reporters produced award-winning investigations covering large and small local governments. The depth and breadth of their public service work was most evident in coverage of the wildfires of 2003 and then 2007, when more than half a million people were evacuated from their homes.
Managing Editor: Mark J. Rochester, markrochester@inewsource.org
Mark J. Rochester began as inewsource managing editor in April 2021, having served as editor in chief at Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative newsroom in Manhattan. He was previously senior news director for investigations at the Detroit Free Press. Both newsrooms, he notes, shared a commitment to diversity and inclusion, and their investigative journalism often received national recognition for exposing problems impacting communities of color.
His family looks forward to returning to California, having spent more than seven years in San Francisco where Rochester was a senior manager for the Associated Press. While with the news cooperative, he led computer-assisted reporting training efforts around the West, both inside and outside of AP, and conducted a widely used analysis of the $74 million in campaign contributions that went toward the California gay marriage ballot initiative in 2008. The AP analyzed who gave and why and then made the data available to member newspapers. The resulting series of stories based on the data was AP’s 2009 Pulitzer nomination for Local Reporting.
Rochester, who served as a Pulitzer Prize jurist in 2017, also has held senior leadership positions at the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, The Denver Post, Newsday and The Indianapolis Star. Rochester is vice president of Investigative Reporters & Editors Inc., the 6,000+ member international organization dedicated to improving investigative journalism. He also serves on the national advisory board of the Investigative Reporting Workshop at American University in Washington, D.C.
Byline Policy
Most of our articles carry a byline to identify the author. In some cases, inewsource will use a brand byline such as “Staff” or “inewsource” for internal or editorial information about the newsroom. In these instances, inewsource‘s Editor and Managing Editor are responsible for content that uses a brand byline.
The Trust Project
inewsource is proud to be a member of The Trust Project and support efforts to increase transparency in journalism by displaying the 8 Trust Indicators on our stories. We launched the Trust Indicators on Sep. 16, 2020.
Privacy Policy
inewsource has prepared this Privacy Policy to explain how we collect, use, protect, and share information when you use our inewsource.org website (the “Site“) or when you use any of our services (the “Services“).
By using the Site or Services you consent to this Privacy Policy.
Log Data
Like many site operators, we collect information that your browser sends whenever you visit our site (“Log Data”).
This Log Data may include information such as your computer’s Internet Protocol (“IP”) address, browser type, browser version, the pages of our site that you visit, the time and date of your visit, the time spent on those pages and other statistics.
Cookies
Cookies are files with small amount of data, which may include an anonymous unique identifier. Cookies are sent to your browser from a web site and stored on your computer or mobile device.
Like many sites, we use “cookies” to collect information. You can instruct your browser to refuse all cookies or to indicate when a cookie is being sent. However, if you do not accept cookies, you may not be able to use some portions of our site.
Certain pages on our site may set other third party cookies. For example, we may embed content, such as videos, from another site that sets a cookie. While we try to minimize these third party cookies, we can’t always control what cookies this third party content sets.
Additionally, we may use third party services — such as those that provide social media conveniences, measure traffic, send newsletters and facilitate donations — that may place cookies on your computer. We don’t have any way of knowing how such services handle the resulting data internally. inewsource makes no claim, nor takes liability for the insecure submission of information via these applications.
Here are the services whose cookies you can find on inewsource.org:
- Sharing buttons for Facebook and Twitter. These use the standard scripts provided by each company.
- Google Analytics, which we use to measure site traffic. Google Analytics gathers certain non-personally identifying information over time, such as your IP address, browser type, internet service provider, referring and exit pages, time stamp, and similar data. We also use Facebook Pixel to measure, optimize and build audiences for advertising campaigns served on Facebook. In particular it enables us to see how our users move between devices when accessing our website and Facebook, to ensure that our Facebook advertising is seen by our users most likely to be interested in such advertising by analyzing which content a user has viewed and interacted with on our website.
- Stripe, which allows us to accept donations through our website.
- Salesforce to manage newsletter subscriber, donor, and other identifiable user data.
- Mailchimp, to manage newsletter distributions. We collect your email address if you choose to subscribe to one of our email newsletters or email news alerts. Other optional information that you enter when subscribing – such as your first and last names or city are simply so that we can deliver more personalized email newsletters. We DO NOT sell, rent or market your information to any other parties. We retain your information only as long as necessary to provide your service. When we send emails, it collects some data about which users open the emails and which links are clicked. We use this information to optimize our email newsletters and, as aggregate information, to explain what percentage of our users open and interact with our newsletters.
Personal Data
We only collect personally identifiable information such as your name and email address when you sign up for a newsletter, donate to our organization, or otherwise submit it to us voluntarily. We do not share your personal data with any third parties other than some common service providers, whose products use your information to help us improve our site, deliver newsletters, or allow us to offer donation opportunities.
inewsource limits access to all user data for the purposes of newsletter, fundraising, and customer service only. User data is not sold to or otherwise shared with anyone not working with or for the inewsource.
You may unsubscribe or opt-out of our email and mail communications at any time by hitting the “unsubscribe” button in any email you receive from inewsource, or by emailing us at contact@inewsource.org or calling us at 619-594-5100.
Donor Information
The identities of all donors will be listed on our website. inewsource does not share, trade, sell, or otherwise release donors’ personal information to any third parties.
Refunds
If you encounter errors when donating on the website, please contact us at members@inewsource.org. For example, if you submit a donation for an incorrect amount or make a duplicate transaction please email us immediately so we can reverse the charges.
Cancellation of Recurring Donations
You can cancel your monthly recurring donations free of charge by notifying us at members@inewsource.org.
Links to Other Websites
Our site may contain links to documents, resources or other websites that we think may be of interest to you. We have no control over these other sites or their content. You should be aware when you leave our site for another, and remember that other sites are governed by their own user agreements and privacy policies, which should be available to you to read.
Disclaimers and Limitation of Liability
Although we take reasonable steps to prevent the introduction of viruses, worms, “Trojan Horses” or other destructive materials to our site, we do not guarantee or warrant that our site or materials that may be downloaded from our site are free from such destructive features. We are not liable for any damages or harm attributable to such features. We are not liable for any claim, loss or injust based on errors, omissions, interruptions or other inaccuracies on our site, nor for any claim, loss or injust that results from your use of this site or your breach of any provision of this User Agreement.
Contact Us
If there are any questions regarding this privacy policy, please contact us at contact@inewsource.org or call us at 619-594-5100.
There are City of San Diego Employees that make more than $500,000/year + benefits, and they will get Pensions when they retire, what’s wrong with a talented director getting paid what he’s worth?
In my personal opinion, no public service employee should make more than five times the average household income of the people they serve (in San Diego that’s about $300,000/yr.). Non-Profits should never spend more than 7% of their revenue upon administration overhead, but it is not clear that an Opera Director is an administrator or a talent?
How does this reconcile with Bard President Jaren Cohn’s third point in her “manifesto” on the SDO website (http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sdopera.com%2FContent%2Flibrary%2FSDO-Manifesto.pdf&h=lAQFkIOY_)
“The Board has been advised again and again by its lawyers that Ian Campbell and Ann Spira Campbell, will both leave the Company’s offices with no payments whatsoever if we close, and that whatever claims they have will be resolved through the dissolution process along with all of the other unsecured creditors.”
Enquiring minds want to know.
Correction: …Board President Karen Cohn…
Talented or not, he’s an ADMINISTRATOR. Your argument of wether he’s talented or not is a moot point as far as getting paid what he’s worth. IMO, he’s NOT worth what he’s paid. If he was there wouldn’t be this fiasco going on. There should be more tickets sold for the Opera. There should be more donations flowing in. There should be more outreach programs that reach young and old alike. There should be more visibility for the Opera out in the underprivileged areas of San Diego. There should be ticket prices that allow for all income brackets to attend – not just your average household of $300k as you stated.
There are trade men and women in the Opera who are equally (if not more) talented than the Campbells – and these talented Opera employees do all the day to day work in putting on a first rate production – including the administrative staff in the box office, marketing, development, Education etc. Their worth indvidually is far greater than one man or woman’s in this case.
Vincent, it means the opera closes, they don’t get a penny. The next day they can come back as creditors and get the full amount of the the remainder of their contracts.
Good to know that this is drawing interest from some authorities. It certainly hasn’t looked like it was on the up and up from the very beginning.
All the layers of disinformation…would they be enough to fire the Campbells for cause, as the Campbells certainly no longer had the best interests of SD Opera in mind at all–merely their own financial best interest.