At least 20 high-level managers and employees at the North County Transit District have left the agency since Jan. 1, continuing an exodus that began more than a year ago.
[one_half][box]
NCTD runs the county’s COASTER, BREEZE, SPRINTER and LIFT transit services, and uses San Diego County’s tax base to support its operations. For the past 16 months, inewsource has published a series of stories in an ongoing investigation detailing the district’s holes in security, misallocation of funding, questionable contracting, high employee turnover, lawsuits, audits and peer criticism.
[/box][/one_half]
All told, the recent departures cost the district $299,489 in severance payouts, according to district records. That amount does not include the costs of rehiring and retraining replacements.
Among those inewsource confirmed have recently left are the chief operations officer, the chief of safety, the chief of transit enforcement, the deputy general manager, the manager of marketing, the director of the Project Management Office and Capital Budget, and the project manager for the district’s $87 million Positive Train Control program.
Other departures include senior contract administrators, civil engineers, grants managers, community affairs supervisors and coordinators.
NCTD would not comment on the turnover. Rather, an email from its CEO, Matthew Tucker, stated that the agency “strongly believes in the right of privacy for both our current and former employees” and doesn’t believe it’s “good business practice” to get into specifics about those who have left.
The agency also wouldn’t confirm who has left. inewsource pieced that together through severance agreements and interviews with former employees.
Richard Katz, a former LA Metrolink chairman and veteran chairman of the Assembly Transportation Committee, has been critical of NCTD operations in the past.
Richard Katz
The turnover now — as it was then — is a concern, Katz said.
“It would be very troubling to me as a board member to see that happening at my agency,” he said.
“Who’s training the new folks that are coming in?” Katz said. “Unless they’re being replaced by similar seniority-level people — which I don’t believe they are — you have to wonder about the training that’s taking place, the operations — how they’re running, what’s happening with the safety culture there.”
The safety culture was just one of many points that the district’s former chief technology officer, Angela Miller, warned about in her resignation letter to NCTD’s board of directors in 2012. In it, she described the climate inside the Oceanside headquarters:
“High personnel turnover led in my opinion to instability, lack of transit experience, a vacuum of basic understanding of federal requirements, dissension and contention among colleagues, and disruption to the organization. I believe the morale of the organization is at an all-time low. The climate encourages the behavior I referenced above, and unchecked will continue to erode the District.”
“I have been vocal to the internal organization about safety and security risks I believe now face the agency as a direct result of this attrition. Eventually, mistakes will be made.”
“I fear for the long-term viability of the agency if course-correction does not occur,” she said.
Anonymous comments
NCTD board member John Aguilera
inewsource asked an NCTD board member, Vista Deputy Mayor John Aguilera, to react to comments from other former NCTD managers — about their experiences inside his agency.
Aguilera instead passed the request up to Tucker, who declined to comment on behalf of NCTD and the board of directors.
“NCTD also does not believe that it is prudent to respond to anonymous comments,” Tucker wrote.
NCTD’s severance agreements warn departing employees about discussing district business:
Yet off-the-record, and for more than a year, many former workers have informed inewsource’s reporting, leading to documents and other primary sources of information that have formed the basis for more than 30 stories over the past year about management and safety issues.
Two of those former managers wished to detail their concerns to Aguilera for his reaction. But because that didn’t work as planned, they are allowing their statements to be published anonymously. inewsource decided to use the information because it’s in the public interest, but agreed not to quote the sources by name because of legal repercussions they could face.
Two veterans
One former higher-up at NCTD wrote to inewsource about the last year in the district:
“A definite lack of trust for all employees and their ability became apparent. General Counsel was brought in. We were writing scopes of work for outside entities to perform tasks that were based in work that we had been hired to perform for the agency. All documents had to be reviewed at the General Counsel level. This became gridlock for most departments. Simple documents could not make it through the constant review process. Some of us were told our performance was declining. Everything was in a state of flux.”
Another former employee, high up on the chain of command, was one of many who placed the blame squarely on NCTD’s CEO:
“It has nothing to do with the riding public anymore, or the long term or short term interest of the agency. It’s all about what makes him look good.”
“There is no morale. You don’t need to be a genius to see that when you fire people on a weekly and biweekly basis, you’re not going to have continuity, you’re not going to have teamwork.”
Katz, from LA, said, “For that number from one railroad to leave, particularly in those senior positions — there’s something going on with the railroad that they’re uncomfortable with, or that doesn’t make sense to them, that they feel they can’t change.”
A little more than a year ago, inewsource wrote about NCTD’s upper-management exodus that — at the time — was just beginning.
inewsource reported:
“Twenty-one of the top 25 senior level employees have left NCTD since Matthew Tucker, once head of transportation for the state of Virginia, took over as CEO in 2009. Some, like Miller, left on their own. Many others were laid off but then replaced with employees who would be laid off and replaced again.”
Throughout inewsource’s investigation, nearly every member of NCTD’s board of directors — elected representatives from the cities of Carlsbad, Del Mar, Encinitas, Vista, Escondido, Oceanside, San Marcos and Solana Beach — has refused to be interviewed or offer comment.
inewsource is currently suing NCTD for the disclosure of records related to a $31,200 management review. A hearing in Superior Court is set for Aug. 15, 2014.
inewsource is a nonprofit, nonpartisan newsroom dedicated to improving lives in the San Diego region and beyond through impactful, data-based investigative and accountability journalism.
Our Vision
Betrayals of the public trust are revealed and rectified, wrongdoing is deterred, and inequities are illuminated thanks to inewsource’s deep, dogged, fact-based reporting.
Our Values
Truth: Above all else, we value the importance of a free and credible press. Truth is the cornerstone of democracy and the core value for inewsource.
Transparency: We build trust with our readers by adhering to the highest standards and ethics, and to reporting with facts, precision and context.
Collaboration: Our newsroom prioritizes collaboration over competition. We regularly partner with media outlets on reporting projects and to share content.
Community: Our reporting serves the San Diego region, and we strive to build relationships with our audience by getting out into the community to listen and engage.
Ethics Policy
inewsource will conduct its business with the highest standards of decency, fairness and accuracy. These standards shall apply equally to inewsource employees, freelancers and all others engaged in gathering information on behalf of inewsource. All receive a copy of these ethical standards.
In the course of our reporting, we will consistently:
● Identify our organization and ourselves fully and avoid false representations of any kind to any source.
● Obtain consent from all parties before electronically recording any interview or conversation except in extraordinary cases authorized by the Managing Editor and Editor. If a source refuses to be taped, that must be honored; no recordings are to be made without consent.
● Respect the individual’s right to privacy. inewsource will never manipulate or barter private, personal, health, financial or other extraneous information in the course of preparing its reports.
● Any source we describe or write about in any significant manner must be contacted. The employee should document all efforts to contact the source, and if unsuccessful, should summarize these efforts at contact in the body of his/her writing.
In addition, inewsource follows the Code of Ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists. The latest version, revised in 2014, can be found here.
Our organization retains full authority over editorial content to protect the best journalistic and business interests of our organization. We will maintain a firewall between news coverage decisions and sources of all revenue. Acceptance of financial support does not constitute implied or actual endorsement of donors or their products, services or opinions.
We accept gifts, grants and sponsorships from individuals and organizations for the general support of our activities, but our news judgments are made independently and not on the basis of donor support. Our organization also may consider donations to support the coverage of particular topics, but our organization maintains editorial control of the coverage. We will cede no right of review or influence of editorial content, nor of unauthorized distribution of editorial content.
Our organization will make public all donors who give a total of $1,000 or more. We will accept anonymous donations for general support only if it is clear that sufficient safeguards have been put into place that the expenditure of that donation is made independently by our organization and in compliance with INN’s Membership Standards.
Diversity
Diverse Voices
Inclusiveness is at the heart of thinking and acting as journalists, and it supports the educational mandate of inewsource. Race, class, generation, gender, sexual orientation, ability, and geography all affect point of view. inewsource believes that reflecting societal differences in reporting leads to better, more nuanced stories and a better-informed community.
inewsource is committed to employment equity and diversity.
Diverse Staffing Report
Below is a breakdown of staffing data at inewsource. We determine the composition of our staff by asking them to self-identify. It is based on a newsroom of 11 and a total staff of 15 as of August 2020. Percentages are based on 15 total survey responses. The numbers include full-time and part-time staff, full-time fellows and full-time and part-time interns.
All Staff Percentages are based on 15 total survey responses. The numbers include full-time and part-time staff, full-time fellows and full-time and part-time interns.
Newsroom Percentages are based on 15 completed survey responses to this question.
Business Percentages are based on 15 completed survey responses to this question.
Gender Identity
Gender Identity
Gender Identity
Women
80%
Women
82%
Women
75%
Men
20%
Men
18%
Men
25%
Sexual Orientation
Sexual Orientation
Sexual Orientation
Straight
87%
Straight
82%
Straight
100%
LGBTQ-identifying
7%
LGBTQ-identifying
7%
Not specified
7%
Not specified
7%
Speak a language beyond English at home
33%
Speak a language beyond English at home
18%
Speak a language beyond English at home
75%
Race/Ethnicity
Race/Ethnicity
Race/Ethnicity
White
67%
White
73%
White
50%
Hispanic or Latinx
20%
Two or more races
18%
Hispanic or Latinx
50%
Two or more races
13%
Hispanic or Latinx
9%
Age
Age
Age
20-29
40%
20-29
45%
20-29
25%
30-39
47%
30-39
45%
30-39
50%
60 or older
13%
60 or older
9%
60 or older
25%
* The percentages in the charts have been rounded and may not add up to 100.
Ownership Structure, Funding and Grants
inewsource is a nonprofit organization, whose legal name is Investigative Newsource. It does business as inewsource. The business was incorporated on Aug. 4, 2009 in the state of California. Tax-exempt status as a 501c3 was granted by the IRS on Sept. 15, 2010. inewsource is funded primarily by individual contributions and foundation grants. We are guided by a board of directors.
Editorial independence: Journalists employed by inewsource take no editorial direction from donors whose contributions may support the organization. inewsource will not hesitate to report on its donors when events warrant. Our Editorial Independence Policy details the firewall between journalism and revenue.
To be transparent with the public, inewsourcelists its donors on its website. In cases where a donor is the subject of an inewsource story, additional disclosure will be made.
Financial Documents
We do our due diligence to earn your trust in our reporting, as well as in our governance and financial sustainability. All of our financial documents are made available to view so that our supporters can trust we are sound stewards of your philanthropy. Review our IRS Form 990s, audited financial statements and annual reports:
Transparency is one of our core values. Today, there is a need to build trust with our audience because new media and ways of communicating spread lies and slanted news faster than “real” news. At the same time, this era of new technologies makes it easier than ever for news organizations to be transparent. People don’t just have to believe us, they can investigate our investigations with our source materials.
Transparency is key to building credibility.
inewsource reporters have primary responsibility for reporting, writing, and fact-checking their stories. But before a story is published, the reporter reviews all facts and sources with an editor or another reporter. Facts must be traced to a primary source.
In addition, we “transparify” certain investigative stories. This process involves publishing a version of the web story with hyperlinks to all the story’s facts. This is proof that all facts have been documented with primary evidence. We do this to build trust with our readers and to be as transparent as we hope the public figures and institutions that we hold accountable will be.
Unnamed Sources
Not all sources are created equal. Some sources cannot speak authoritatively, provide proper analysis or speak specifically to every inquiry placed before them. To maintain the integrity of our reporting, inewsource reporters must select sources who can speak with validity to the topic at hand, and avoid presenting unqualified or underqualified sources as experts.
If an interviewed source has a conflict of interest, or whose qualifications may be tangential or limited, reporters will note that within the context of the story.
It is incumbent upon reporters to fully background their sources to uncover conflicts of interest or slant prior to using them in a story.
Unless discussed prior to an interview, all subjects talking to inewsource journalists are on the record. Specifically, the source is identified by name and title, and their exact or paraphrased words are attributed to them for publication. If journalists speak with sources who are not politicians, public figures or those not commonly interviewed by journalists, staff should explain clearly that information discussed will be on the record and for publication.
There are times, however, when information may be critical for a story but cannot be found or verified by other means. For example, a source may be able to confirm specific information about a series of events they may have witnessed, but have legitimate concerns about using their name or title. The repercussions to the source could be legal, job-related retribution or personal safety. The source and journalist must discuss these potential dangers and terms of use should be agreed upon by both parties.
If inewsource publishes information from an anonymous source, inewsource will explain to readers, in as much detail as possible, why we agreed to anonymity.
Corrections and Clarifications
inewsource strives for accuracy in everything we do, which is why we are committed to fact checking our content. But sometimes we make errors. When that happens, we correct them. We also clarify stories when something we’ve written is confusing or could be misinterpreted.
We endeavor to always be transparent about our commitment to correcting errors and clarifying misperceptions. When staffers see, hear or read about a possible issue with the accuracy of any inewsource content, they are expected to bring it to the attention of an editor and the web producer so it can be evaluated to determine how to proceed.
Including the web producer is key because inewsource is a multimedia news organization and shares its content with multiple partners on multiple platforms. The web producer must alert these partners about corrections and clarifications.
Corrections and clarifications should be included at the bottom of stories and dated.
Actionable Feedback and Newsroom Contacts
Our audiences know the region we cover and have a stake in maintaining and improving the quality of life in San Diego and Imperial counties. We know your knowledge and insights can help shape what we cover and how we cover it. We invite your comments and complaints on news stories, suggestions for issues to cover or sources to consult. We rely on you to tell us when we get it right and when we need to keep pushing.
Your comments, questions and suggestions can be sent to the team as a whole at contact@inewsource.org or you can contact a specific member of our staff.
Lorie Hearn is the chief executive officer, editor and founder of inewsource. She founded inewsource in the summer of 2009, following a successful reporting and editing career in newspapers. She retired from The San Diego Union-Tribune, where she had been a reporter, Metro Editor and finally the senior editor for Metro and Watchdog Journalism. In addition to department oversight, Hearn personally managed a four-person watchdog team, composed of two data specialists and two investigative reporters. Hearn was a Nieman Foundation fellow at Harvard University in 1994-95. She focused on juvenile justice and drug control policy, a natural course to follow her years as a courts and legal affairs reporter at the San Diego Union and then the Union-Tribune.
Hearn became Metro Editor in 1999 and oversaw regional and city news coverage, which included the city of San Diego’s financial debacle and near bankruptcy. Reporters and editors on Metro during her tenure were part of the Pulitzer Prize-winning stories that exposed Congressman Randy “Duke” Cunningham and led to his imprisonment.
Hearn began her journalism career as a reporter for the Bucks County Courier Times, a small daily outside of Philadelphia, shortly after graduating from the University of Delaware. During the decades following, she moved through countless beats at five newspapers on both coasts.
High-profile coverage included the historic state Supreme Court election in 1986, when three sitting justices were ousted from the bench, and the 1992 execution of Robert Alton Harris. That gas chamber execution was the first time the death penalty was carried out in California in 25 years.
In her nine years as Metro Editor at the Union-Tribune, Hearn made watchdog reporting a priority. Her reporters produced award-winning investigations covering large and small local governments. The depth and breadth of their public service work was most evident in coverage of the wildfires of 2003 and then 2007, when more than half a million people were evacuated from their homes.
Laura Wingard is the managing editor at inewsource. She has been an editor in San Diego since 2002, working at The San Diego Union-Tribune, KPBS and now inewsource. At the Union-Tribune, she served in a variety of roles including as enterprise editor, government editor, public safety and legal affairs editor, and metro editor. She directed the newspaper’s award-winning coverage of the October 2007 wildfires and the 2010 disappearance of Poway teenager Chelsea King. She also oversaw reporting on San Diego’s pension crisis.
For two years, Wingard was news and digital editor at KPBS, overseeing a team of four multimedia reporters and two web producers. She also was the KPBS liaison with inewsource and collaborated with inewsource chief executive officer and editor Lorie Hearn on investigative work by both news organizations.
Wingard also worked at the Las Vegas Review-Journal as the city editor and as an award-winning reporter covering the environment and politics. She also was the assistant managing editor for metro at The Press-Enterprise in Riverside. She earned her bachelor’s degree at California State University, Fullerton, with a double major in communications/journalism and political science.
Brad Racino is the assistant editor and a senior reporter at inewsource. He has produced investigations for print, radio and TV on topics including political corruption, transportation, health, maritime, education and nonprofits.
His cross-platform reporting for inewsource has earned more than 50 awards since 2012, including back-to-back national medals from Investigative Reporters and Editors, two national Edward R. Murrow awards, a Meyer “Mike” Berger award from New York City’s Columbia Journalism School, the Sol Price Award for Responsible Journalism, San Diego SPJ’s First Amendment Award, and a national Emmy nomination.
In 2017, Racino was selected by the Institute for Nonprofit News as one of 10 “Emerging Leaders” in U.S. nonprofit journalism.
Racino has worked as a reporter and database analyst for News21; as a photographer, videographer and reporter for the Columbia Missourian; as a project coordinator for the National Freedom of Information Coalition and as a videographer and editor for Verizon Fios1 TV in New York. He received his master’s degree in journalism from the University of Missouri in 2012.
Byline Policy
Most of our articles carry a byline to identify the author. In some cases, inewsource will use a brand byline such as “Staff” or “inewsource” for internal or editorial information about the newsroom. In these instances, inewsource‘s Editor and Managing Editor are responsible for content that uses a brand byline.
The Trust Project
inewsource is proud to be a member of The Trust Project and support efforts to increase transparency in journalism by displaying the 8 Trust Indicators on our stories. We launched the Trust Indicators on Sep. 16, 2020.
Privacy Policy
inewsource has prepared this Privacy Policy to explain how we collect, use, protect, and share information when you use our inewsource.org website (the “Site“) or when you use any of our services (the “Services“).
By using the Site or Services you consent to this Privacy Policy.
Log Data
Like many site operators, we collect information that your browser sends whenever you visit our site (“Log Data”).
This Log Data may include information such as your computer’s Internet Protocol (“IP”) address, browser type, browser version, the pages of our site that you visit, the time and date of your visit, the time spent on those pages and other statistics.
Cookies
Cookies are files with small amount of data, which may include an anonymous unique identifier. Cookies are sent to your browser from a web site and stored on your computer or mobile device.
Like many sites, we use “cookies” to collect information. You can instruct your browser to refuse all cookies or to indicate when a cookie is being sent. However, if you do not accept cookies, you may not be able to use some portions of our site.
Certain pages on our site may set other third party cookies. For example, we may embed content, such as videos, from another site that sets a cookie. While we try to minimize these third party cookies, we can’t always control what cookies this third party content sets.
Additionally, we may use third party services — such as those that provide social media conveniences, measure traffic, send newsletters and facilitate donations — that may place cookies on your computer. We don’t have any way of knowing how such services handle the resulting data internally. inewsource makes no claim, nor takes liability for the insecure submission of information via these applications.
Here are the services whose cookies you can find on inewsource.org:
Sharing buttons for Facebook and Twitter. These use the standard scripts provided by each company.
Google Analytics, which we use to measure site traffic. Google Analytics gathers certain non-personally identifying information over time, such as your IP address, browser type, internet service provider, referring and exit pages, time stamp, and similar data. We also use Facebook Pixel to measure, optimize and build audiences for advertising campaigns served on Facebook. In particular it enables us to see how our users move between devices when accessing our website and Facebook, to ensure that our Facebook advertising is seen by our users most likely to be interested in such advertising by analyzing which content a user has viewed and interacted with on our website.
Stripe, which allows us to accept donations through our website.
Salesforce to manage newsletter subscriber, donor, and other identifiable user data.
Mailchimp, to manage newsletter distributions. We collect your email address if you choose to subscribe to one of our email newsletters or email news alerts. Other optional information that you enter when subscribing – such as your first and last names or city are simply so that we can deliver more personalized email newsletters. We DO NOT sell, rent or market your information to any other parties. We retain your information only as long as necessary to provide your service. When we send emails, it collects some data about which users open the emails and which links are clicked. We use this information to optimize our email newsletters and, as aggregate information, to explain what percentage of our users open and interact with our newsletters.
Personal Data
We only collect personally identifiable information such as your name and email address when you sign up for a newsletter, donate to our organization, or otherwise submit it to us voluntarily. We do not share your personal data with any third parties other than some common service providers, whose products use your information to help us improve our site, deliver newsletters, or allow us to offer donation opportunities.
inewsource limits access to all user data for the purposes of newsletter, fundraising, and customer service only. User data is not sold to or otherwise shared with anyone not working with or for the inewsource.
You may unsubscribe or opt-out of our email and mail communications at any time by hitting the “unsubscribe” button in any email you receive from inewsource, or by emailing us at contact@inewsource.org or calling us at 619-594-5100.
Donor Information
The identities of all donors will be listed on our website. inewsource does not share, trade, sell, or otherwise release donors’ personal information to any third parties.
Refunds
If you encounter errors when donating on the website, please contact us at members@inewsource.org. For example, if you submit a donation for an incorrect amount or make a duplicate transaction please email us immediately so we can reverse the charges.
Cancellation of Recurring Donations
You can cancel your monthly recurring donations free of charge by notifying us at members@inewsource.org.
Links to Other Websites
Our site may contain links to documents, resources or other websites that we think may be of interest to you. We have no control over these other sites or their content. You should be aware when you leave our site for another, and remember that other sites are governed by their own user agreements and privacy policies, which should be available to you to read.
Disclaimers and Limitation of Liability
Although we take reasonable steps to prevent the introduction of viruses, worms, “Trojan Horses” or other destructive materials to our site, we do not guarantee or warrant that our site or materials that may be downloaded from our site are free from such destructive features. We are not liable for any damages or harm attributable to such features. We are not liable for any claim, loss or injust based on errors, omissions, interruptions or other inaccuracies on our site, nor for any claim, loss or injust that results from your use of this site or your breach of any provision of this User Agreement.
Contact Us
If there are any questions regarding this privacy policy, please contact us at contact@inewsource.org or call us at 619-594-5100.
Brad Racino is the assistant editor and senior investigative reporter at inewsource. He's a big fan of transparency, whistleblowers and government agencies forgetting to redact key information from FOIA requests.
Brad received his master’s degree in journalism from the University of Missouri...
More by Brad Racino
7 replies on “Managers continue to leave North County Transit District, severance adds up”
Dear Brad,
Thank you for your ongoing investigation of NCTD. I have a great interest because I have been riding the NCTD 101 Breeze to and from work daily for the past 22 years, and I would like to see public transportation run well and fairly in the future. Bill Miller
Thank you, Bill. I appreciate your reading.
I’ll keep on it..
I am a former NCTD employee, and I would add that the exodus was going on even before I got there two years ago. The exodus started in 2009 when Tucker came in. Unfortunately with Bill Horn winning another term, the exodus will continue, because Tucker will remain. The best thing that could happen at NCTD would be Tucker taking a gig elsewhere.
If you live in North County, you need to contact your rep on the Board and ask them to take a long, hard look at what Tucker is doing at NCTD, and why there is no continuity at NCTD. If you ride the COASTER, contact the Board. Same goes for the SPRINTER or Bus. Your safety and everyone else’s depends on it.
There is a lack of knowledge at NCTD. You have a constant flow of new employees coming in and then leaving, and there is know knowledge base to lean on. Processes and procedures are not documented, managers don’t manage, and people with poor personality traits are allowed to run wild until they are axed and given severance.
A couple of notes. Metrolink is not exactly a friend to NCTD. They would love to take over the NCTD territory and absorb it so they can have access to the SD Territory south of Oceanside. So using RIchard Katz for quotes gets a little dicey. Katz has skin in the game, so perhaps remove him from the go to list for quotes.
The same goes for Angela Miller. Miller had a pretty chequered history at the agency, and was one of the personalities that was allowed to run wild, until some of her work was finally reviewed. In short, she left a big mess to clean up.
In short, no one seems to be in charge day to day at NCTD. Decent decisions can be made, but Tucker can and will override, like he did on the Sprinter PR outsourcing.
Now that the agency has inside legal counsel, the counsel is used to insulate tucker, block progress and is yet another bad personality.
Bottom line: Tucker’s record at the agency needs to be reviewed, from poor oversight of the transit contractors, poor oversight of his managers, bad behavior toward staff and contractors. Tucker is a disaster, and a bad guy who shouldn’t have the right to toy with people’s jobs and the public’s safety.
I may have criticized Racino in the past, but now more than ever, we need this information disseminated far and wide in the county until it reaches critical mass.
I read the comment from “Ann” above with great interest.
I agree with 95% of Ann’s comment. I enthusiastically echo the advice for riders of the buses and trains to contact their NCTD Board representatives. The organizational disarray caused by Tucker will inevitably affect the safety of NCTD’s riders. The NCTD Board is ignoring red flag after red flag. Do not let the problems escalate to the level of a fatal accident before taking action.
I have to respectfully disagree with Ann on a few small points. Specifically, all concerned citizens should thank Richard Katz, Angela Miller, and Brad Racino for their efforts to help improve the terrible situation created by Matt Tucker.
First, Richard Katz. His credentials speak for themselves – years of achievement at both LA MTA and at Metrolink. Regarding NCTD, he should be thanked for his willingness to go on the record about Tucker’s mess. Obviously his views are shared by the other agencies who’ve worked with Tucker, in Virginia and California. But most of those officials aren’t willing to spend any of their political capital to improve the situation in north San Diego County. Katz has been willing, and kudos to him for standing up. It would be good if some of the other officials at MTA, OCTA, MTS, and SANDAG shared his courage.
Second, Angela Miller. Her credentials also speak for themselves, including national recognition from Computerworld and from the American Public Transportation Association. She is without question the most effective CIO in NCTD’s history. She also made a direct attempt to notify the NCTD Board of the problems facing NCTD. Her warnings were prescient. Just months after her warning to the NCTD Board, the Sprinter was shut down for an extended period. Tucker has never provided a full accounting for why Sprinter maintenance projects were delayed and canceled prior to the shutdown. Miller’s courage should also be applauded.
Third, Brad Racino. He has received national recognition for his reporting on NCTD. His meticulous research and attention to detail is very impressive. Without his reporting, many of the revelations of the past year would have been obscured by a fog of Tucker’s self-serving press releases and cover-ups. If any former employee thinks he has missed a big issue, I urge you to call him and let him know. Better to help Racino do further reporting than be silent on the sidelines.
But as I mentioned at the outset, I agree with the other 95% of Ann’s comment. We need a “big tent” of cooperation in changing NCTD. The situation at NCTD is further degenerating. It is a mystery how public officials on the NCTD Board can stick their heads in the sand on this problem. The citizens of north San Diego county deserve far better than the service Matt Tucker is providing them.
Thanks, Ann. I will take your comments into consideration. Regarding Angela Miller — I do not know her, but I am slightly stuck in that she is the only person I have ever been able to find who actually put her concerns in writing. And those are the concerns that I’ve been told time and again by employees who will not go on the record… so it makes sense to me to use Miller’s letter to highlight these things.
Regarding Katz — if I could find someone else in a position of authority like him to add to the list of folks going on the record, I would do it. And believe me I’ve been trying. Hopefully more will come forward soon.
Thanks for reading, and I appreciate the comments.
-Brad
Interesting that Angela Miller felt compelled to comment on her own legacy at NCTD.
To that I would say, the past is the past, and one should just be glad they don’t work at NCTD any more, especially if they were able to grab a piece of the five year pension.
I worked at NCTD at one point in 2012, so if we start adding up all the people who have left in the last 3 years, I counted about 30 during my time, there was 21 listed above, and maybe 21 in 2011, according to some of the links in these articles. That’s 70 people in 3-4 years, and I suspect it’s way higher if were to count First Transit, TASI, FACT and any of the other contractors. No matter how you add it up, it’s a travesty for workers, and for taxpayers, and for the ridership.
In short, it’s not just managers who are fleeing, it’s regular employees as well. In fact, you’re better off if you’re a manager, because then you have fewer deliverables in your hands, ie more ways to fail. Only the function people survive at NCTD, ie payroll, accounting, some of the infrastructure, and perhaps IT. Otherwise, you’re not meeting your “goals”, and it’s impossible to meet your goals with their outdated requisition processes and all the legal review.
It’s the classic catch-22, if you’re competent, the pile it on, even if it’s way outside of your job description. And no, a lot of people inside and outside the agency will never comment, because the world of transit is small, and even some of those who leave go to companies that then work with the agency. Richard Katz can comment because he’s an ex board member at Metrolink, so he has little association now with the world of transit. Believe me, no employee of Metrolink would ever comment.
An other issue is San Diego is so car dependentl, most people have no interest in public transit, because they don’t use it. So although we need people to contact their city reps, I bet few will do so. IT will probably take 4 more years until Horn is off the board for change to occur. Outside of Horn and Packard (gallo?), most of the current board members are new with only a year or so under their belts, so they don’t know much about the workings of the agency. Also, they don’t come into the offices and they probably only spend a couple of hours a month on agency business, in addtion to the other boards they sit on.
So oversight of NCTD is completely lacking. There is literally NO ONE to curb Tucker. The whole staff would have to resign this afternoon to have an effect. Tucker’s main task when he came in was to fire the bus drivers and rid the agency of its pension mess and the debt that came in from the Sprinter. Lots of agencies outsource now, and it’s doable, but NCTD runs at such a thin margin on personnel, that when coupled with high turnover, you have huge gaps in oversight, both in the office and with contractors.
Your best hope is Tucker either decides to move, or gets nailed for some of his bullying tactics. But with no one to go on record, good luck with that. Hopefully it won’t take another screw up like the Sprinter to get the Board to realize that Tucker must go.
NCTD board if you’re reading, please review the list of severance money and resignations and act…
I have been told that of these 2 separate transit companies in S.D. county: that 1 is ‘federally funded’, as the other is not. In why there be no merge of these 2 (MTS/NCTD). As S.D. as a county is small enough in that 2 individual transit companies are not needed. Even more, as public transit be not yet be enough in the demand. MTS would do better management than NCTD, I had known for some time. But already, I as a (mostly) MTS been a WATCHDOG against their lack of performance. As there be no others. And NCTD needs such the same for their transit system.
I HAVE THANKED BRAD, For Brad’s Earlier Coverage About MTS Security Guards. Add that over time, MTS has added more security in the trolley cars — due to Our 1st Amendment being used. As our chats are being recorded inside.
Dear Brad,
Thank you for your ongoing investigation of NCTD. I have a great interest because I have been riding the NCTD 101 Breeze to and from work daily for the past 22 years, and I would like to see public transportation run well and fairly in the future. Bill Miller
Thank you, Bill. I appreciate your reading.
I’ll keep on it..
I am a former NCTD employee, and I would add that the exodus was going on even before I got there two years ago. The exodus started in 2009 when Tucker came in. Unfortunately with Bill Horn winning another term, the exodus will continue, because Tucker will remain. The best thing that could happen at NCTD would be Tucker taking a gig elsewhere.
If you live in North County, you need to contact your rep on the Board and ask them to take a long, hard look at what Tucker is doing at NCTD, and why there is no continuity at NCTD. If you ride the COASTER, contact the Board. Same goes for the SPRINTER or Bus. Your safety and everyone else’s depends on it.
There is a lack of knowledge at NCTD. You have a constant flow of new employees coming in and then leaving, and there is know knowledge base to lean on. Processes and procedures are not documented, managers don’t manage, and people with poor personality traits are allowed to run wild until they are axed and given severance.
A couple of notes. Metrolink is not exactly a friend to NCTD. They would love to take over the NCTD territory and absorb it so they can have access to the SD Territory south of Oceanside. So using RIchard Katz for quotes gets a little dicey. Katz has skin in the game, so perhaps remove him from the go to list for quotes.
The same goes for Angela Miller. Miller had a pretty chequered history at the agency, and was one of the personalities that was allowed to run wild, until some of her work was finally reviewed. In short, she left a big mess to clean up.
In short, no one seems to be in charge day to day at NCTD. Decent decisions can be made, but Tucker can and will override, like he did on the Sprinter PR outsourcing.
Now that the agency has inside legal counsel, the counsel is used to insulate tucker, block progress and is yet another bad personality.
Bottom line: Tucker’s record at the agency needs to be reviewed, from poor oversight of the transit contractors, poor oversight of his managers, bad behavior toward staff and contractors. Tucker is a disaster, and a bad guy who shouldn’t have the right to toy with people’s jobs and the public’s safety.
I may have criticized Racino in the past, but now more than ever, we need this information disseminated far and wide in the county until it reaches critical mass.
I read the comment from “Ann” above with great interest.
I agree with 95% of Ann’s comment. I enthusiastically echo the advice for riders of the buses and trains to contact their NCTD Board representatives. The organizational disarray caused by Tucker will inevitably affect the safety of NCTD’s riders. The NCTD Board is ignoring red flag after red flag. Do not let the problems escalate to the level of a fatal accident before taking action.
I have to respectfully disagree with Ann on a few small points. Specifically, all concerned citizens should thank Richard Katz, Angela Miller, and Brad Racino for their efforts to help improve the terrible situation created by Matt Tucker.
First, Richard Katz. His credentials speak for themselves – years of achievement at both LA MTA and at Metrolink. Regarding NCTD, he should be thanked for his willingness to go on the record about Tucker’s mess. Obviously his views are shared by the other agencies who’ve worked with Tucker, in Virginia and California. But most of those officials aren’t willing to spend any of their political capital to improve the situation in north San Diego County. Katz has been willing, and kudos to him for standing up. It would be good if some of the other officials at MTA, OCTA, MTS, and SANDAG shared his courage.
Second, Angela Miller. Her credentials also speak for themselves, including national recognition from Computerworld and from the American Public Transportation Association. She is without question the most effective CIO in NCTD’s history. She also made a direct attempt to notify the NCTD Board of the problems facing NCTD. Her warnings were prescient. Just months after her warning to the NCTD Board, the Sprinter was shut down for an extended period. Tucker has never provided a full accounting for why Sprinter maintenance projects were delayed and canceled prior to the shutdown. Miller’s courage should also be applauded.
Third, Brad Racino. He has received national recognition for his reporting on NCTD. His meticulous research and attention to detail is very impressive. Without his reporting, many of the revelations of the past year would have been obscured by a fog of Tucker’s self-serving press releases and cover-ups. If any former employee thinks he has missed a big issue, I urge you to call him and let him know. Better to help Racino do further reporting than be silent on the sidelines.
But as I mentioned at the outset, I agree with the other 95% of Ann’s comment. We need a “big tent” of cooperation in changing NCTD. The situation at NCTD is further degenerating. It is a mystery how public officials on the NCTD Board can stick their heads in the sand on this problem. The citizens of north San Diego county deserve far better than the service Matt Tucker is providing them.
Thanks, Ann. I will take your comments into consideration. Regarding Angela Miller — I do not know her, but I am slightly stuck in that she is the only person I have ever been able to find who actually put her concerns in writing. And those are the concerns that I’ve been told time and again by employees who will not go on the record… so it makes sense to me to use Miller’s letter to highlight these things.
Regarding Katz — if I could find someone else in a position of authority like him to add to the list of folks going on the record, I would do it. And believe me I’ve been trying. Hopefully more will come forward soon.
Thanks for reading, and I appreciate the comments.
-Brad
Interesting that Angela Miller felt compelled to comment on her own legacy at NCTD.
To that I would say, the past is the past, and one should just be glad they don’t work at NCTD any more, especially if they were able to grab a piece of the five year pension.
I worked at NCTD at one point in 2012, so if we start adding up all the people who have left in the last 3 years, I counted about 30 during my time, there was 21 listed above, and maybe 21 in 2011, according to some of the links in these articles. That’s 70 people in 3-4 years, and I suspect it’s way higher if were to count First Transit, TASI, FACT and any of the other contractors. No matter how you add it up, it’s a travesty for workers, and for taxpayers, and for the ridership.
In short, it’s not just managers who are fleeing, it’s regular employees as well. In fact, you’re better off if you’re a manager, because then you have fewer deliverables in your hands, ie more ways to fail. Only the function people survive at NCTD, ie payroll, accounting, some of the infrastructure, and perhaps IT. Otherwise, you’re not meeting your “goals”, and it’s impossible to meet your goals with their outdated requisition processes and all the legal review.
It’s the classic catch-22, if you’re competent, the pile it on, even if it’s way outside of your job description. And no, a lot of people inside and outside the agency will never comment, because the world of transit is small, and even some of those who leave go to companies that then work with the agency. Richard Katz can comment because he’s an ex board member at Metrolink, so he has little association now with the world of transit. Believe me, no employee of Metrolink would ever comment.
An other issue is San Diego is so car dependentl, most people have no interest in public transit, because they don’t use it. So although we need people to contact their city reps, I bet few will do so. IT will probably take 4 more years until Horn is off the board for change to occur. Outside of Horn and Packard (gallo?), most of the current board members are new with only a year or so under their belts, so they don’t know much about the workings of the agency. Also, they don’t come into the offices and they probably only spend a couple of hours a month on agency business, in addtion to the other boards they sit on.
So oversight of NCTD is completely lacking. There is literally NO ONE to curb Tucker. The whole staff would have to resign this afternoon to have an effect. Tucker’s main task when he came in was to fire the bus drivers and rid the agency of its pension mess and the debt that came in from the Sprinter. Lots of agencies outsource now, and it’s doable, but NCTD runs at such a thin margin on personnel, that when coupled with high turnover, you have huge gaps in oversight, both in the office and with contractors.
Your best hope is Tucker either decides to move, or gets nailed for some of his bullying tactics. But with no one to go on record, good luck with that. Hopefully it won’t take another screw up like the Sprinter to get the Board to realize that Tucker must go.
NCTD board if you’re reading, please review the list of severance money and resignations and act…
I have been told that of these 2 separate transit companies in S.D. county: that 1 is ‘federally funded’, as the other is not. In why there be no merge of these 2 (MTS/NCTD). As S.D. as a county is small enough in that 2 individual transit companies are not needed. Even more, as public transit be not yet be enough in the demand. MTS would do better management than NCTD, I had known for some time. But already, I as a (mostly) MTS been a WATCHDOG against their lack of performance. As there be no others. And NCTD needs such the same for their transit system.
I HAVE THANKED BRAD, For Brad’s Earlier Coverage About MTS Security Guards. Add that over time, MTS has added more security in the trolley cars — due to Our 1st Amendment being used. As our chats are being recorded inside.