Last weekend and into today, the billionaire Koch brothers and supporters converged on the St. Regis Monarch Beach Resort in Dana Point. This columned, luxury compound, little more than an hour north of San Diego, has 400 rooms, a spa, a golf course, a private beach and six restaurants. Staff confirmed the entire hotel — including food and beverage service — had been bought out for a special event.
An event so secret it had a code name on the schedule: “T&R Sales Meeting.”
Hotel guests who weren’t part of the conference — including two inewsource reporters who stayed the night Friday — were escorted out of the hotel by security on Saturday afternoon.
But over 24 hours at the St. Regis, they got a glimpse of what lay ahead at the conference entitled American Courage, Our Commitment to a Free Society.
[divider]
“Arriving,” 3:39 p.m.
This was the first text between two reporters and an editor during what would become a 24-hour attempt to learn about the semi-annual political summit hosted by the sixth-richest men in the world: David and Charles Koch.
The retreats drum up hundreds of millions of dollars for conservative political candidates and set policy for the Kochs’ network of political organizations, which all share the same goal — moving the country to the right.
Most of the cash is funneled through “dark money” groups that are not legally required to disclose their donors.
According to Forbes, the brothers are worth $41.3 billion.
Click here to listen to the reporters talk with KPBS Morning Edition about their 24 hours at the St. Regis.
These are the most elite and most conservative political events in the country, and for the past few years, reporters and political bloggers have attempted to gain access. Two inewsource reporters booked rooms at the St. Regis, a five-star resort, to find out who would attend and what was on the agenda.
“It’s about freedom,” a 20-something man said when asked what the conference was about.
For many of the wealthy conservatives who attend these summits, it’s also about being able to influence the political process without being publicly identified, according to author and Politico’s chief investigative reporter, Kenneth Vogel.
“This big money is having an increasing impact on the political process on elections, on governing, and it’s become harder and harder to find who is doing the spending,” said Vogel, who twice infiltrated a Koch summit and whose book, “Big Money,” examines the issue.
Big money also buys big secrecy.
It can buy an entire luxury hotel for three days and a security force to ensure no one without an invitation gets in.
Hotel staff confirmed the resort was bought from Saturday to Tuesday for a private event. Some said it was a wedding, others speculated it was a celebrity, “extreme VIP” or someone political.
With tax, the least expensive room costs $609 a night.
It was the biggest show of security one longtime employee — who had met movie stars and royalty at the hotel — said they had ever seen.
“American Courage, Our Commitment to a Free Society,” was the theme — as evidenced by the oversized posters lining the hall into the meeting rooms, but the chatter indicated what else was on attendee’s minds: the new national education standards of Common Core, lost emails in the IRS investigation into unfair scrutiny of the tea party and other conservative groups, and political correctness.
As Friday-night guests checked out Saturday morning, a picture of who would attend the summit emerged: mostly male, mostly white middle-aged and older, some with their families or wives.
Represented at the summit were groups such as Americans for Prosperity, Mercatus Center, the Libre Initiative, and more — all part of the well-funded network able to contribute massive amounts of cash into political causes anonymously.
To see full list of groups represented at the summit, click here
James Davis, the former communications director and chief spokesman for the 2012 Republican National Convention, checked in under Freedom Partners, where he now serves as Vice President of Strategic Communications. Freedom Partners is a “nonprofit, nonpartisan… chamber of commerce that promotes the benefits of free markets and a free society,” according to its website. It’s one of the key conservative groups the Koch brothers use to fund their political candidates and causes, according to the Washington Post.
Carl Anderson, the former chairman and CEO of Arrow International Inc. and current board member and independent Director at Carpenter Technology Corp., checked in shortly after. This was Anderson’s third conference, and he was clearly a familiar face.
A huge security force of young men wearing blue sport coats and tan pants began to fan out inside the hotel’s maze of corridors and seating areas.
At 5:35 p.m., David Koch, the younger of the two brothers, walked quickly into the hotel, surrounded by an entourage.
At 6-feet five-inches and with all the confidence of one of the wealthiest people in the country, David Koch made a striking entrance.
He was once a college basketball player, according to a 2010 profile in New York Magazine, “when you could be white and be good.” He’s a libertarian whose father, Fred Koch, helped found the John Birch Society, an anti-communist, and what some consider, radical right, political group.
Koch quickly disappeared into the luxurious ether of the hotel, not to be seen in public again until later that night, when he emerged from the private dining room of the hotel’s premier restaurant, Stonehill Tavern, flanked by security.
Down the hall from the restaurant were two rows of at least eight black and white oversized prints affixed to silver-framed mirrors leaning against the walls. The prints depicted a family of three: a woman with a kerchief on her head, a man in a suit and cap, and a boy with his arm pointing to the Statue of Liberty in the distance, evoking a nostalgic coming-to-America picture of immigration.
“American Courage,” was printed in bold across the top.
“Our commitment to a free society,” written underneath.
At the end of the hallway, the grand staircase led to a ballroom and a series of meeting rooms. A worker swept the walls with what looked like a metal detector. He joked he was “cleaning the walls.”
Audio visual equipment was everywhere. A group of men walked into the ballroom. They’d been there for days working on preparations for the conference, but gave no hint about what the conference was about.
It’s the secrecy of these meetings that has fueled so much of the criticism. Secrecy combined with money.
Charles Lewis, founder of the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Public Integrity and an expert on campaign finance, said the Koch brothers would likely say their personal safety dictates secrecy, but Lewis said that’s a red herring.
“I think they just don’t want the notoriety of being not only in the one percent but in the tiny, tiny fraction of the one percent of the richest human beings on planet earth — who by the way are also trying to influence politics so they can get even richer,” Lewis said.
Politico’s Vogel said small numbers of wealthy donors are having almost as much impact on the process as the political parties themselves.
“It’s incumbent upon us, as journalists, members of the media, to try and pull back the curtain as far as we can to try and give voters the ability to make informed decisions about who is influencing the debate, who is trying to get which candidate elected…,” Vogel said.
The Koch brothers only recently became a household name. The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, allowing corporations and labor unions to spend unrestricted amounts of money to support or denounce candidates and causes, thrust the issue of political spending into the spotlight. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid accused the Koch brothers of being “one of the main causes” of climate change, referring to their energy and chemical conglomerate.
The Koch brothers and their allies plan to raise nearly $300 million to spend on the 2014 election and fund a new energy initiative “with a deregulatory, pro-consumer spin,” according to a story published by the Daily Beast on Friday. The story said energy was expected to be a big part of this conference — but there was no evidence of that from anything in public view.
The emphasis was vaguely on freedom, with one attendee joking about the lack of it at the hotel.
“There’s no freedom around here — you’ve got to follow directions,” he said.
The secret summits are also attended by big name politicians. Past attendees have included New Jersey and Texas Governors Chris Christie and Rick Perry, according to Politico.
The Daily Beast reported Sen. Marco Rubio, a Republican from Florida and potential GOP Presidential 2016 candidate, was expected to attend the St. Regis event.
No politicians were spotted Friday night, just groups of mostly men hanging out in the hotel bar and around the patio fire pit, talking politics.
“Academic institutions are factories for corruption,” one said to another.
They talked about political prospects, and one man remarked that he liked “Herrera,” possibly a reference to Jaime Herrera Beutler, who represents Washington’s 3rd congressional district.
“You’re into Latinos, eh?” the other replied.
The man who said he liked Herrera talked about working on Rick Santorum’s campaign, and how it was the “Tylenol quote” that killed Santorum’s chances in the 2012 Republican primary. Foster Friess, one of Santorum’s most prominent backers, told MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell “back in my days, they used Bayer aspirin for contraceptives. The gals put it between their knees, and it wasn’t that costly,” he said.
They talked about how things said in private would sound terrible in public.
“My wife is a spik, I call her a wetback sometimes,” one man said, laughing.
Around midnight, details of the upcoming schedule trickled out.
Saturday was loaded with golf. The event’s opening reception was Saturday afternoon. Seminar registration was to begin Sunday.
The heading on the schedule read “T&R Sales Meeting.”
By 2 a.m., the open areas of the hotel were almost deserted.
A janitor polished the handrails leading down the large spiral staircase to the Pacific Ballroom, at the far end of the hallway lined with American Courage mirrors.
Saturday
By 8 a.m. Saturday, staffers at the hotel’s Malta room handed out black folios to new arrivals, as a security guard stood outside the closed doors. The folios never left their hands.
A man conspicuous in his dark glasses — and what appeared to be a Google glass piece of hardware over his right lens — staked out a busy corridor.
“What a shady looking guy,” a man said to a woman as they walked by.
“He’s our intelligence guy,” the woman replied.
By mid-morning, sound checks were conducted in a ballroom, with another security guard standing in front of the entrance.
By 1 p.m., most of the hotel restaurants had shut down to the public, with just a few guests from Friday night left on the grounds.
At the Pool Bar & Grill a few conference attendees had lunch.
A gray-haired man in a blue suit greeted a husband and wife at a nearby table.
“Could things get any worse?” he asked.
“I suppose they could get a lot worse — that’s why we’re here, isn’t it?” the other replied. Both shared a laugh.
By 2 p.m., one man who was not with the conference was surrounded by four security guards. He was told he had to leave the premises because it was being occupied by a private function.
“What does that have to do with me?” he asked.
“You have to leave,” one of them responded.
Meanwhile, Charles Koch was making his way to the hotel gym for his 30-minute workout.
Koch, 78, the second oldest of the four brothers, is the chairman and CEO of Koch Industries. Just two months ago, he wrote a column for the Wall Street Journal, describing his vision of a free society:
“In a truly free society, any business that disrespects its customers will fail, and deserves to do so,” he wrote. “The same should be true of any government that disrespects its citizens. The central belief and fatal conceit of the current administration is that you are incapable of running your own life, but those in power are capable of running it for you.”
Koch wore grey Nike sneakers with neon green trim and socks hiked up halfway to his knees. He pulled out a mat at the far end of the gym and lay down. He stretched his legs, as one of his body guards watched through a glass wall from the adjoining atrium.
Koch paused in between sets to watch TV. The World Cup was on. He pulled a few smaller weights from the rack — five or 10 pounders — and sat at an incline bench closest to the glass wall.
Outside, two women and a man were swimming laps in the small pool. An older white man, with white hair and a hat, lay on a chaise lounge in a hotel robe. He carried with him an America³ bag. America³ was a racing yacht and syndicate operated by Bill Koch and Harry Melges in the 1992 America’s Cup.
By late afternoon, once the hotel was cleared of outsiders including two inewsource reporters, the conference began in earnest.
Vogel said we’re in a new political reality, in which the super wealthy are able to exert influence into the process without their names attached. And it happens on both sides of the aisle.
He cited the Democracy Alliance, which he called “a secretive group of wealthy liberals that’s the closest thing the left has to the vaunted Koch brothers’ political network” in a story earlier this year. The DA, as it’s known, also has big, closed-door meetings for well-heeled donors.
“They’re very much in competition in this new political world in which we live,” Vogel said.
It’s important for people to pay attention to the big money phenomenon, Lewis said.
“Most Americans don’t give to political campaigns,” he said. “Most people that give a check of $1,000 or more, it’s basically one or two percent of the American population at most, and that’s at most. It’s a fraction of one percent, I believe, at that level.”
“…That’s why we should care,” he said.
Disclaimer: Charles Lewis, found of the Center for Public Integrity and a campaign finance expert, is also a member of the inewsource board of directors.
- Editorial Standards Page
- Ethics Policy
- Diversity Statement
- Diversity Staffing Report
- Corrections Policy
- Ownership Structure, Funding
- Founding Date
- Masthead
- Mission Statement with Coverage Priorities
- Fact-checking Standards
- Unnamed Sources Policy
Editorial Standards Page
- Our Mission
- Ethics Policy
- Diversity
- Ownership Structure, Funding and Grants
- Financial Documents
- Fact-checking and Verification Standards
- Unnamed Sources
- Corrections and Clarifications
- Actionable Feedback and Newsroom Contacts
- Masthead
- Byline Policy
- The Trust Project
- Privacy Policy
Our Mission
inewsource is a nonprofit, nonpartisan newsroom dedicated to improving lives in the San Diego region and beyond through impactful, data-based investigative and accountability journalism.
Our Vision
Betrayals of the public trust are revealed and rectified, wrongdoing is deterred, and inequities are illuminated thanks to inewsource’s deep, dogged, fact-based reporting.
Our Values
Truth: Above all else, we value the importance of a free and credible press. Truth is the cornerstone of democracy and the core value for inewsource.
Transparency: We build trust with our readers by adhering to the highest standards and ethics, and to reporting with facts, precision and context.
Collaboration: Our newsroom prioritizes collaboration over competition. We regularly partner with media outlets on reporting projects and to share content.
Community: Our reporting serves the San Diego region, and we strive to build relationships with our audience by getting out into the community to listen and engage.
Ethics Policy
inewsource will conduct its business with the highest standards of decency, fairness and accuracy. These standards shall apply equally to inewsource employees, freelancers and all others engaged in gathering information on behalf of inewsource. All receive a copy of these ethical standards.
In the course of our reporting, we will consistently:
● Identify our organization and ourselves fully and avoid false representations of any kind to any source.
● Obtain consent from all parties before electronically recording any interview or conversation except in extraordinary cases authorized by the Managing Editor and Editor. If a source refuses to be taped, that must be honored; no recordings are to be made without consent.
● Respect the individual’s right to privacy. inewsource will never manipulate or barter private, personal, health, financial or other extraneous information in the course of preparing its reports.
● Any source we describe or write about in any significant manner must be contacted. The employee should document all efforts to contact the source, and if unsuccessful, should summarize these efforts at contact in the body of his/her writing.
In addition, inewsource follows the Code of Ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists. The latest version, revised in 2014, can be found here.
Editorial Independence Policy
We subscribe to standards of editorial independence adopted by the Institute for Nonprofit News (INN) as follows:
Our organization retains full authority over editorial content to protect the best journalistic and business interests of our organization. We will maintain a firewall between news coverage decisions and sources of all revenue. Acceptance of financial support does not constitute implied or actual endorsement of donors or their products, services or opinions.
We accept gifts, grants and sponsorships from individuals and organizations for the general support of our activities, but our news judgments are made independently and not on the basis of donor support. Our organization also may consider donations to support the coverage of particular topics, but our organization maintains editorial control of the coverage. We will cede no right of review or influence of editorial content, nor of unauthorized distribution of editorial content.
Our organization will make public all donors who give a total of $1,000 or more. We will accept anonymous donations for general support only if it is clear that sufficient safeguards have been put into place that the expenditure of that donation is made independently by our organization and in compliance with INN’s Membership Standards.
Diversity
Diverse Voices
Inclusiveness is at the heart of thinking and acting as journalists, and it supports the educational mandate of inewsource. Race, class, generation, gender, sexual orientation, ability, and geography all affect point of view. inewsource believes that reflecting societal differences in reporting leads to better, more nuanced stories and a better-informed community.
inewsource is committed to employment equity and diversity.
Diverse Staffing Report
Below is a breakdown of staffing data at inewsource. We determine the composition of our staff by asking them to self-identify. It is based on a newsroom of 11 and a total staff of 15 as of August 2020. Percentages are based on 15 total survey responses. The numbers include full-time and part-time staff, full-time fellows and full-time and part-time interns.
| All Staff Percentages are based on 15 total survey responses. The numbers include full-time and part-time staff, full-time fellows and full-time and part-time interns. | Newsroom Percentages are based on 15 completed survey responses to this question. | Business Percentages are based on 15 completed survey responses to this question. | |||
| Gender Identity | Gender Identity | Gender Identity | |||
| Women | 80% | Women | 82% | Women | 75% |
| Men | 20% | Men | 18% | Men | 25% |
| Sexual Orientation | Sexual Orientation | Sexual Orientation | |||
| Straight | 87% | Straight | 82% | Straight | 100% |
| LGBTQ-identifying | 7% | LGBTQ-identifying | 7% | ||
| Not specified | 7% | Not specified | 7% | ||
| Speak a language beyond English at home | 33% | Speak a language beyond English at home | 18% | Speak a language beyond English at home | 75% |
| Race/Ethnicity | Race/Ethnicity | Race/Ethnicity | |||
| White | 67% | White | 73% | White | 50% |
| Hispanic or Latinx | 20% | Two or more races | 18% | Hispanic or Latinx | 50% |
| Two or more races | 13% | Hispanic or Latinx | 9% | ||
| Age | Age | Age | |||
| 20-29 | 40% | 20-29 | 45% | 20-29 | 25% |
| 30-39 | 47% | 30-39 | 45% | 30-39 | 50% |
| 60 or older | 13% | 60 or older | 9% | 60 or older | 25% |
* The percentages in the charts have been rounded and may not add up to 100.
Ownership Structure, Funding and Grants
inewsource is a nonprofit organization, whose legal name is Investigative Newsource. It does business as inewsource. The business was incorporated on Aug. 4, 2009 in the state of California. Tax-exempt status as a 501c3 was granted by the IRS on Sept. 15, 2010. inewsource is funded primarily by individual contributions and foundation grants. We are guided by a board of directors.
Editorial independence: Journalists employed by inewsource take no editorial direction from donors whose contributions may support the organization. inewsource will not hesitate to report on its donors when events warrant. Our Editorial Independence Policy details the firewall between journalism and revenue.
To be transparent with the public, inewsource lists its donors on its website. In cases where a donor is the subject of an inewsource story, additional disclosure will be made.
Financial Documents
We do our due diligence to earn your trust in our reporting, as well as in our governance and financial sustainability. All of our financial documents are made available to view so that our supporters can trust we are sound stewards of your philanthropy. Review our IRS Form 990s, audited financial statements and annual reports:
Tax Returns
Financial Statements
Annual Reports
Fact-checking and Verification Standards
Transparency is one of our core values. Today, there is a need to build trust with our audience because new media and ways of communicating spread lies and slanted news faster than “real” news. At the same time, this era of new technologies makes it easier than ever for news organizations to be transparent. People don’t just have to believe us, they can investigate our investigations with our source materials.
Transparency is key to building credibility.
inewsource reporters have primary responsibility for reporting, writing, and fact-checking their stories. But before a story is published, the reporter reviews all facts and sources with an editor or another reporter. Facts must be traced to a primary source.
In addition, we “transparify” certain investigative stories. This process involves publishing a version of the web story with hyperlinks to all the story’s facts. This is proof that all facts have been documented with primary evidence. We do this to build trust with our readers and to be as transparent as we hope the public figures and institutions that we hold accountable will be.
Unnamed Sources
Not all sources are created equal. Some sources cannot speak authoritatively, provide proper analysis or speak specifically to every inquiry placed before them. To maintain the integrity of our reporting, inewsource reporters must select sources who can speak with validity to the topic at hand, and avoid presenting unqualified or underqualified sources as experts.
If an interviewed source has a conflict of interest, or whose qualifications may be tangential or limited, reporters will note that within the context of the story.
It is incumbent upon reporters to fully background their sources to uncover conflicts of interest or slant prior to using them in a story.
Unless discussed prior to an interview, all subjects talking to inewsource journalists are on the record. Specifically, the source is identified by name and title, and their exact or paraphrased words are attributed to them for publication. If journalists speak with sources who are not politicians, public figures or those not commonly interviewed by journalists, staff should explain clearly that information discussed will be on the record and for publication.
There are times, however, when information may be critical for a story but cannot be found or verified by other means. For example, a source may be able to confirm specific information about a series of events they may have witnessed, but have legitimate concerns about using their name or title. The repercussions to the source could be legal, job-related retribution or personal safety. The source and journalist must discuss these potential dangers and terms of use should be agreed upon by both parties.
If inewsource publishes information from an anonymous source, inewsource will explain to readers, in as much detail as possible, why we agreed to anonymity.
Corrections and Clarifications
inewsource strives for accuracy in everything we do, which is why we are committed to fact checking our content. But sometimes we make errors. When that happens, we correct them. We also clarify stories when something we’ve written is confusing or could be misinterpreted.
We endeavor to always be transparent about our commitment to correcting errors and clarifying misperceptions. When staffers see, hear or read about a possible issue with the accuracy of any inewsource content, they are expected to bring it to the attention of an editor and the web producer so it can be evaluated to determine how to proceed.
Including the web producer is key because inewsource is a multimedia news organization and shares its content with multiple partners on multiple platforms. The web producer must alert these partners about corrections and clarifications.
Corrections and clarifications should be included at the bottom of stories and dated.
Actionable Feedback and Newsroom Contacts
Our audiences know the region we cover and have a stake in maintaining and improving the quality of life in San Diego and Imperial counties. We know your knowledge and insights can help shape what we cover and how we cover it. We invite your comments and complaints on news stories, suggestions for issues to cover or sources to consult. We rely on you to tell us when we get it right and when we need to keep pushing.
Your comments, questions and suggestions can be sent to the team as a whole at contact@inewsource.org or you can contact a specific member of our staff.
Masthead
CEO, Editor and Founder: Lorie Hearn, loriehearn@inewsource.org
Lorie Hearn is the chief executive officer, editor and founder of inewsource. She founded inewsource in the summer of 2009, following a successful reporting and editing career in newspapers. She retired from The San Diego Union-Tribune, where she had been a reporter, Metro Editor and finally the senior editor for Metro and Watchdog Journalism. In addition to department oversight, Hearn personally managed a four-person watchdog team, composed of two data specialists and two investigative reporters. Hearn was a Nieman Foundation fellow at Harvard University in 1994-95. She focused on juvenile justice and drug control policy, a natural course to follow her years as a courts and legal affairs reporter at the San Diego Union and then the Union-Tribune.
Hearn became Metro Editor in 1999 and oversaw regional and city news coverage, which included the city of San Diego’s financial debacle and near bankruptcy. Reporters and editors on Metro during her tenure were part of the Pulitzer Prize-winning stories that exposed Congressman Randy “Duke” Cunningham and led to his imprisonment.
Hearn began her journalism career as a reporter for the Bucks County Courier Times, a small daily outside of Philadelphia, shortly after graduating from the University of Delaware. During the decades following, she moved through countless beats at five newspapers on both coasts.
High-profile coverage included the historic state Supreme Court election in 1986, when three sitting justices were ousted from the bench, and the 1992 execution of Robert Alton Harris. That gas chamber execution was the first time the death penalty was carried out in California in 25 years.
In her nine years as Metro Editor at the Union-Tribune, Hearn made watchdog reporting a priority. Her reporters produced award-winning investigations covering large and small local governments. The depth and breadth of their public service work was most evident in coverage of the wildfires of 2003 and then 2007, when more than half a million people were evacuated from their homes.
Managing Editor: Mark J. Rochester, markrochester@inewsource.org
Mark J. Rochester began as inewsource managing editor in April 2021, having served as editor in chief at Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative newsroom in Manhattan. He was previously senior news director for investigations at the Detroit Free Press. Both newsrooms, he notes, shared a commitment to diversity and inclusion, and their investigative journalism often received national recognition for exposing problems impacting communities of color.
His family looks forward to returning to California, having spent more than seven years in San Francisco where Rochester was a senior manager for the Associated Press. While with the news cooperative, he led computer-assisted reporting training efforts around the West, both inside and outside of AP, and conducted a widely used analysis of the $74 million in campaign contributions that went toward the California gay marriage ballot initiative in 2008. The AP analyzed who gave and why and then made the data available to member newspapers. The resulting series of stories based on the data was AP’s 2009 Pulitzer nomination for Local Reporting.
Rochester, who served as a Pulitzer Prize jurist in 2017, also has held senior leadership positions at the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, The Denver Post, Newsday and The Indianapolis Star. Rochester is vice president of Investigative Reporters & Editors Inc., the 6,000+ member international organization dedicated to improving investigative journalism. He also serves on the national advisory board of the Investigative Reporting Workshop at American University in Washington, D.C.
Byline Policy
Most of our articles carry a byline to identify the author. In some cases, inewsource will use a brand byline such as “Staff” or “inewsource” for internal or editorial information about the newsroom. In these instances, inewsource‘s Editor and Managing Editor are responsible for content that uses a brand byline.
The Trust Project
inewsource is proud to be a member of The Trust Project and support efforts to increase transparency in journalism by displaying the 8 Trust Indicators on our stories. We launched the Trust Indicators on Sep. 16, 2020.
Privacy Policy
inewsource has prepared this Privacy Policy to explain how we collect, use, protect, and share information when you use our inewsource.org website (the “Site“) or when you use any of our services (the “Services“).
By using the Site or Services you consent to this Privacy Policy.
Log Data
Like many site operators, we collect information that your browser sends whenever you visit our site (“Log Data”).
This Log Data may include information such as your computer’s Internet Protocol (“IP”) address, browser type, browser version, the pages of our site that you visit, the time and date of your visit, the time spent on those pages and other statistics.
Cookies
Cookies are files with small amount of data, which may include an anonymous unique identifier. Cookies are sent to your browser from a web site and stored on your computer or mobile device.
Like many sites, we use “cookies” to collect information. You can instruct your browser to refuse all cookies or to indicate when a cookie is being sent. However, if you do not accept cookies, you may not be able to use some portions of our site.
Certain pages on our site may set other third party cookies. For example, we may embed content, such as videos, from another site that sets a cookie. While we try to minimize these third party cookies, we can’t always control what cookies this third party content sets.
Additionally, we may use third party services — such as those that provide social media conveniences, measure traffic, send newsletters and facilitate donations — that may place cookies on your computer. We don’t have any way of knowing how such services handle the resulting data internally. inewsource makes no claim, nor takes liability for the insecure submission of information via these applications.
Here are the services whose cookies you can find on inewsource.org:
- Sharing buttons for Facebook and Twitter. These use the standard scripts provided by each company.
- Google Analytics, which we use to measure site traffic. Google Analytics gathers certain non-personally identifying information over time, such as your IP address, browser type, internet service provider, referring and exit pages, time stamp, and similar data. We also use Facebook Pixel to measure, optimize and build audiences for advertising campaigns served on Facebook. In particular it enables us to see how our users move between devices when accessing our website and Facebook, to ensure that our Facebook advertising is seen by our users most likely to be interested in such advertising by analyzing which content a user has viewed and interacted with on our website.
- Stripe, which allows us to accept donations through our website.
- Salesforce to manage newsletter subscriber, donor, and other identifiable user data.
- Mailchimp, to manage newsletter distributions. We collect your email address if you choose to subscribe to one of our email newsletters or email news alerts. Other optional information that you enter when subscribing – such as your first and last names or city are simply so that we can deliver more personalized email newsletters. We DO NOT sell, rent or market your information to any other parties. We retain your information only as long as necessary to provide your service. When we send emails, it collects some data about which users open the emails and which links are clicked. We use this information to optimize our email newsletters and, as aggregate information, to explain what percentage of our users open and interact with our newsletters.
Personal Data
We only collect personally identifiable information such as your name and email address when you sign up for a newsletter, donate to our organization, or otherwise submit it to us voluntarily. We do not share your personal data with any third parties other than some common service providers, whose products use your information to help us improve our site, deliver newsletters, or allow us to offer donation opportunities.
inewsource limits access to all user data for the purposes of newsletter, fundraising, and customer service only. User data is not sold to or otherwise shared with anyone not working with or for the inewsource.
You may unsubscribe or opt-out of our email and mail communications at any time by hitting the “unsubscribe” button in any email you receive from inewsource, or by emailing us at contact@inewsource.org or calling us at 619-594-5100.
Donor Information
The identities of all donors will be listed on our website. inewsource does not share, trade, sell, or otherwise release donors’ personal information to any third parties.
Refunds
If you encounter errors when donating on the website, please contact us at members@inewsource.org. For example, if you submit a donation for an incorrect amount or make a duplicate transaction please email us immediately so we can reverse the charges.
Cancellation of Recurring Donations
You can cancel your monthly recurring donations free of charge by notifying us at members@inewsource.org.
Links to Other Websites
Our site may contain links to documents, resources or other websites that we think may be of interest to you. We have no control over these other sites or their content. You should be aware when you leave our site for another, and remember that other sites are governed by their own user agreements and privacy policies, which should be available to you to read.
Disclaimers and Limitation of Liability
Although we take reasonable steps to prevent the introduction of viruses, worms, “Trojan Horses” or other destructive materials to our site, we do not guarantee or warrant that our site or materials that may be downloaded from our site are free from such destructive features. We are not liable for any damages or harm attributable to such features. We are not liable for any claim, loss or injust based on errors, omissions, interruptions or other inaccuracies on our site, nor for any claim, loss or injust that results from your use of this site or your breach of any provision of this User Agreement.
Contact Us
If there are any questions regarding this privacy policy, please contact us at contact@inewsource.org or call us at 619-594-5100.
Ethics Policy
This policy can be found on this page.
Diversity Statement
This policy can be found on this page.
Diversity Staffing Report
This policy can be found on this page.
Corrections Policy
This policy can be found on this page.
Ownership Structure, Funding
This policy can be found on this page.
Founding Date
2009-11-01
Masthead
This policy can be found on this page.
Mission Statement with Coverage Priorities
This policy can be found on this page.
Fact-checking Standards
This policy can be found on this page.
Unnamed Sources Policy
This policy can be found on this page.
Article Post Types
post
Wow – these reporters are a little ridiculous. Who are they to decide who is apart of the conference and who isn’t? Maybe they should be reporting on something a little more important than the kochs’ excercise regiment.
Thank you for your work on this story. It is important that we all know about the attitudes and power of these people who want desperately to influence the way all Americans live. Their ideology is against the interest of most Americans and should be countered and discredited. The reporters did a good job. I live in Dana Point and forwarded the article to our local paper.
Wow. Congratulations. I can die now knowing that I read the most lame piece of garbage masquerading as reporting that I have ever seen.
Yeah…I could see these two so-called reporter running to their mommies when they weren’t invited to the neighbor’s birthday party….
Congrats to the reporters. Harry Reid is now talking about their story from the floor of the Senate.
See the attached video:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/19/harry-reid-koch-brothers_n_5511257.html
Senator Reid is talking about the same paranoia and security silliness iSource first reported.
Calling it lame garbage is supposed to cover up the fact that the Koch brothers and their friends are laughable and creepy? Is D Zee a Koch troll?
Hahaha. But I love cake so much.
Lame reporting or not, the importance of the coverage of the opening of the Koch brothers’ billionaires summit depicts how dangerous the 1 percent are and why they increasingly are a serious threat to democracy in America. The Kochs, Adelsons, Art Pope and others like them give off an aroma of totalitarianism and despotism, a stench that festers in the culture. Any American who votes for a Republican is voting for the demise of their own way of life as well as against the nation’s Constitutional foundation.
@James Dougherty, It’s amazing how many just don’t get it. It’s also amazing from some of the comments on here that think it’s a big joke. Maybe a few here are in the 1% but I doubt that they would take a break from counting their money or checking their stock portfolios to come on any site to make inane comments. It’s boggles the mind that after all the evidence in front of them so many will defend the likes of the ones you mentioned and even more insane willing vote for their own demise. It’s as if they think by voting for a party that shows nothing but contempt for the 99% will make their lives better tho they are part of the 99%. Or maybe they think the billionaires will thank them for voting for their bought and paid for politicians by writing them checks and make them rich. Talk about crazy.
I encourage anyone who writes this article off as “lame” to realize that this type of insight and exposure into a very dangerous group with this type of new age influence on politics can be the difference between great positive change through public awareness or a distracted public leading to the most significant and evil changes to the world in American history, certainly in my lifetime. Please educate yourselves on how history unfolds for better or worse based on the public awareness of great threats at any current period in history. This is no joke and current history will unfold based on how serious we take these issues and discoveries.
I know this sounds epic but tell me a time in history when the events surrounding anyone who had the power to change the world weren’t this epic? The Koch brothers have already influenced the course of history with their untouchable mass of finances effecting politics and through the cause of literal defects in the environment and economy. The Koch brothers rise to power behind the curtain has an epic tale and journey dating all the way back to the years of Stalin pre Vietnam. This wasn’t over night, friends. Their influence and stronghold on your future and your children’s future has not had a more prominent place in America due to the consistent deregulation of monies influence in politics. Please educate yourselves. This is not a game. This is our current history unfolding whether you are savvy to it or not. Thank you to the journalists who have already known these facts.
It’s a proven phenomenom that many captives come to love and trust their captors. This is what we see in republican extremeist land. Gullible saps who can’t see the forest for the trees.
These people need to be eliminated from the face of the Earth, for the benefit of all.