[powerpress]
inewsource is always looking for new ways to bring deeply researched investigative and data-driven stories to San Diego County residents. That’s why we are exploring podcasts as a way to share longform audio storytelling. This builds on our current radio reporting for our media partner, KPBS.
We are piloting this podcast with a story we first reported in November 2015. Reporter Chris Young found that airlines were routinely violating a curfew intended to keep departing planes grounded from 11:30 p.m. to 6:30 a.m. However, out of the more than 200 violations since 2010 only about half had resulted in a fine.
We also want your feedback: Tell us what you like — or don’t like — about the podcast, what we can do to make it better and what kinds of stories and issues you would like to hear. You can tweet at us or email us here. You can also find our contact information at the bottom of the post.
In the podcast, Young discussed the story with reporter Leo Castaneda.
____________________________________________________
LEO CASTANEDA: Hi everyone, and welcome to our first ever inewsource online exclusive radio story. I’m here with my colleague Chris Young …
CHRIS YOUNG: Hey there, Leo.
CASTANEDA: And Chris we’re here because of a story you did looking at airport curfew violations.
YOUNG: That’s right, this story specifically takes a look at the 11:30 p.m. curfew for takeoffs at San Diego International Airport. Airlines are supposed to face fines for breaking the curfew.
But what we found is that the airport authority often doesn’t penalize airlines when their planes take off late when people are sleeping.
NANCY PALMTAG: Half the time they break the curfew, nothing happens.
YOUNG: That’s Nancy Palmtag, she’s lived in Loma Portal since 1975. So this curfew is important to her.
I talked with Nancy on a recent afternoon. Her home sits right under the flight path.
As we sat down in her living room, I showed her data we analyzed from the airport authority. The data showed all of the curfew violations going back five years.
Specifically, it showed that airlines have broken curfew more than 200 times since 2010. But almost half of those violations have gone unpunished. Again, here’s Nancy:
NANCY PALMTAG: It’s just not fair. It wasn’t put in to be played with like this.
CASTANEDA: I get it, the curfew is there for a reason.
NANCY PALMTAG: And that was to give the residents some amount of confidence that once the curfew time actually started, ohhh, we could breathe a sigh of relief. And just then, another plane comes.
(sound of airplane flying by)
YOUNG: Just like now?
NANCY PALMTAG: Just like now.
YOUNG: You can imagine how frustrating those planes can be during the day. Now picture that happening at midnight or 1 am, when you’re trying to sleep.
I wanted to get a better idea of what it’s like living under the flight path. So I went out near Point Loma. I found a good spot at NTC Park, in Liberty Station.
It’s a small park just across a sliver of the bay near the airport, and there are lots of homes located nearby. I recorded a plane taking off at around 11 o’clock. Here’s what it sounded like.
(sound of airplane takeoff)
CASTANEDA: Woah. That’s really loud.
YOUNG: Exactly. I talked with another Point Loma resident — Kirk Hanson — who is all-too familiar with the sound of jet engines overhead.
KIRK HANSON: You’re affecting thousands and thousands of people on the ground when those flights go. I mean, 11:30 is already late, but like 11:40, midnight, one o’clock. It wakes people up.
CASTANEDA: When those late night flights take off past curfew, airlines are supposed to pay a price. You mentioned that the data shows that’s often not how things turn out. But when they do get fined, how much are the penalties?
YOUNG: The curfew regulation, which the airport authority established in 1989, says airlines that take off late typically face fines of $2,000 to $10,000 — and sometimes more.
The fines go up if there are multiple violations within a given time period.
Take last October. JetBlue paid a $30,000 penalty for a flight that was delayed because the plane was overweight and had to de-fuel. And they’ve paid some other big fines, too, including one that was $40,000.
In fact, speaking of JetBlue …
JETBLUE ANNOUNCER: If you’re just joining us, welcome to JetBlue Airways service to Boston …
YOUNG: JetBlue has broken San Diego’s curfew more than any other airline. Since 2010, it’s taken off late a total of 54 times.
The airline has paid more than $300,000 in penalties for those violations. But more than half of JetBlue’s violations have not resulted in fines.
CASTANEDA: It sounds like they’re getting let off the hook quite a bit. Let’s say I’m a resident under this departing flight path and I’m upset about these after-hours takeoffs. Where can I go?
YOUNG: Well, you could start by attending one of the Airport Noise Advisory Committee’s quarterly meetings.
JENNIFER LILLEY: Good afternoon. Can everyone hear me in the back? …
CASTANEDA: Oooo a public meeting! Buckle in, it’s gonna be a bumpy ride!
YOUNG: Fair enough, it’s not the most exciting of places. But the committee makes recommendations to the airport authority on noise-related issues. That includes curfew violations. I went to the committee’s October meeting, which attracted an unusually large crowd.
JENNIFER LILLEY: Typically we have about six people that come to this meeting, not the wonderful audience that we have here today.
YOUNG: Most, if not all of the people there were actually attending because of a Federal Aviation Administration proposal to move the flight path for departing flights. It’s part of a nationwide plan to modernize air traffic control.
Point Loma and Ocean Beach residents have really been fighting the proposal. They argue that the changes are going to increase noise and pollution in the community.
But whether or not the changes go into effect, the skies above those neighborhoods are always supposed to be quiet overnight. And that’s because of the curfew.
CASTANEDA: You could say that airport noise complaints have really been … taking off lately?
YOUNG: Just play the tape, Leo.
JENNIFER LILLEY: The first item I’d like to talk about is our curfew violation review statistics in the past quarter.
YOUNG: If you ducked out of the meeting for a bathroom break, you would have missed the very brief presentation on the most recent curfew violations. The overview lasted just a couple of minutes.
But one committee member — his name is David Swarens — zeroed in on a couple of JetBlue’s late flights that were posted on a big screen at the meeting.
DAVID SWARENS: There’s one carrier that has two fairly significant violations. … Is there anything else going on here with that carrier that’s encouraging them to be a better citizen?
YOUNG: Swarens’ questions was answered by Sjohnna Knack. She’s the airport’s program manager for noise mitigation. She explained why JetBlue breaks curfew so frequently.
SJOHNNA KNACK: These are red-eye departures going to New York and Boston, and they’re leaving late. Often times they are late arriving. Sometimes they have mechanical issues. But this particular company, ya know, they work really hard not to violate.
CASTANEDA: Did JetBlue give you any reason for their violations?
YOUNG: The airline declined an interview request. But in an email, JetBlue said it’s adjusted its flight schedule to better adhere to the curfew. And it noted that its violations have decreased in the past year.
CASTANEDA: But even for a big national airline 300-grand in 5 years has got to sting. That’s a lot of checked baggage fees. Hasn’t anyone sat down with their executives and said, you know, “C’mon guys, get it together …”
YOUNG: I don’t know how exactly they worded it, but yeah, the airline’s violations were becoming such a problem that local airport officials, including the CEO, flew to New York to confront JetBlue executives.
Keith Wilschetz is the airport authority’s planning and noise mitigation director. He was at that meeting with JetBlue and he told me how it went.
KEITH WILSCHETZ: We explained to them why this is so important. And they explained to us what some of their issues and concerns are. And it was very helpful for us to understand one another. We came away with their commitment that they are gonna do all they can to try and help improve the situation, and they did.
CASTANEDA: Does Wilschetz understand why some residents are upset that airlines aren’t being punished for these violations?
YOUNG: He said he does.
He told me that a panel of airport officials carefully reviews each violation before deciding how much to fine an airline — if at all. And he said the decision not to penalize an airline is often about safety.
KEITH WILSCHETZ: We don’t want them to make a decision to leave even though there’s a mechanical problem because they don’t want to have to pay the fine.
YOUNG: Airport Authority records show that airlines are most often excused from paying fines when their late flights are caused by mechanical problems.
Remember Kirk Hanson, the Point Loma resident? He’s also a member of the Airport Noise Advisory Committee. He doesn’t understand how airlines can avoid fines because of maintenance issues.
KIRK HANSON: If you’re an operator of a big airline, you’re going to have mechanical problems, delays, but I don’t think that should get you off the hook for violating the curfew.
CASTANEDA: Now, JetBlue isn’t the only airline around. Who else keeps breaking the curfew?
YOUNG: Delta has the second most violations. They’ve broken curfew 31 times since 2010. It’s been fined for only 10 of those violations.
Then it’s United Airlines with 19 violations. But of those violations, only three resulted in fines.
CASTANEDA: Let me flip that on you then. Who are the good citizens? Does the data tell you who is doing a good job of not breaking curfew?
YOUNG: I was actually a bit surprised by this. Southwest Airlines is the biggest carrier in San Diego, but it hasn’t had any curfew violations since 2010.
Airport officials told me there were a few reasons for that: For one thing, Southwest doesn’t operate red-eye flights to the East Coast. It also has a bigger fleet, making it easier to swap planes if mechanical issues occur.
CASTANEDA: Obviously having more available planes and fewer flights cutting close to that curfew help. But still, no violations? Didn’t they slip up at least once?
YOUNG: Airport officials told me that Southwest takes the curfew really seriously. Once again, here’s airport official Sjohhna Knack.
SJOHNNA KNACK: As a policy, Southwest has made a decision that they will not violate curfew. So they have actually canceled flights.
CASTANEDA: That’s interesting. One last thing, Chris. This curfew is for outgoing flights between 11:30 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. But what about incoming flights? Isn’t there a curfew for when planes can land?
YOUNG: I actually got that question a lot when I was working on that story, and no. Airplanes can land at any time of night. They don’t face any fines for landing late.
CASTANEDA: Well Chris, great story as always. Thank you all for listening, you can go to inewsource.org for more information about this, including a searchable database, right?
YOUNG: That’s right, readers can see all the violations over the past five years. The data shows if they resulted in a fine. And if not, why they weren’t penalized.
CASTANEDA: For inewsource I’m Leo Castaneda
YOUNG: And I’m Chris Young.
- Editorial Standards Page
- Ethics Policy
- Diversity Statement
- Diversity Staffing Report
- Corrections Policy
- Ownership Structure, Funding
- Founding Date
- Masthead
- Mission Statement with Coverage Priorities
- Fact-checking Standards
- Unnamed Sources Policy
Editorial Standards Page
- Our Mission
- Ethics Policy
- Diversity
- Ownership Structure, Funding and Grants
- Financial Documents
- Fact-checking and Verification Standards
- Unnamed Sources
- Corrections and Clarifications
- Actionable Feedback and Newsroom Contacts
- Masthead
- Byline Policy
- The Trust Project
- Privacy Policy
Our Mission
inewsource is a nonprofit, nonpartisan newsroom dedicated to improving lives in the San Diego region and beyond through impactful, data-based investigative and accountability journalism.
Our Vision
Betrayals of the public trust are revealed and rectified, wrongdoing is deterred, and inequities are illuminated thanks to inewsource’s deep, dogged, fact-based reporting.
Our Values
Truth: Above all else, we value the importance of a free and credible press. Truth is the cornerstone of democracy and the core value for inewsource.
Transparency: We build trust with our readers by adhering to the highest standards and ethics, and to reporting with facts, precision and context.
Collaboration: Our newsroom prioritizes collaboration over competition. We regularly partner with media outlets on reporting projects and to share content.
Community: Our reporting serves the San Diego region, and we strive to build relationships with our audience by getting out into the community to listen and engage.
Ethics Policy
inewsource will conduct its business with the highest standards of decency, fairness and accuracy. These standards shall apply equally to inewsource employees, freelancers and all others engaged in gathering information on behalf of inewsource. All receive a copy of these ethical standards.
In the course of our reporting, we will consistently:
● Identify our organization and ourselves fully and avoid false representations of any kind to any source.
● Obtain consent from all parties before electronically recording any interview or conversation except in extraordinary cases authorized by the Managing Editor and Editor. If a source refuses to be taped, that must be honored; no recordings are to be made without consent.
● Respect the individual’s right to privacy. inewsource will never manipulate or barter private, personal, health, financial or other extraneous information in the course of preparing its reports.
● Any source we describe or write about in any significant manner must be contacted. The employee should document all efforts to contact the source, and if unsuccessful, should summarize these efforts at contact in the body of his/her writing.
In addition, inewsource follows the Code of Ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists. The latest version, revised in 2014, can be found here.
Editorial Independence Policy
We subscribe to standards of editorial independence adopted by the Institute for Nonprofit News (INN) as follows:
Our organization retains full authority over editorial content to protect the best journalistic and business interests of our organization. We will maintain a firewall between news coverage decisions and sources of all revenue. Acceptance of financial support does not constitute implied or actual endorsement of donors or their products, services or opinions.
We accept gifts, grants and sponsorships from individuals and organizations for the general support of our activities, but our news judgments are made independently and not on the basis of donor support. Our organization also may consider donations to support the coverage of particular topics, but our organization maintains editorial control of the coverage. We will cede no right of review or influence of editorial content, nor of unauthorized distribution of editorial content.
Our organization will make public all donors who give a total of $1,000 or more. We will accept anonymous donations for general support only if it is clear that sufficient safeguards have been put into place that the expenditure of that donation is made independently by our organization and in compliance with INN’s Membership Standards.
Diversity
Diverse Voices
Inclusiveness is at the heart of thinking and acting as journalists, and it supports the educational mandate of inewsource. Race, class, generation, gender, sexual orientation, ability, and geography all affect point of view. inewsource believes that reflecting societal differences in reporting leads to better, more nuanced stories and a better-informed community.
inewsource is committed to employment equity and diversity.
Diverse Staffing Report
Below is a breakdown of staffing data at inewsource. We determine the composition of our staff by asking them to self-identify. It is based on a newsroom of 11 and a total staff of 15 as of August 2020. Percentages are based on 15 total survey responses. The numbers include full-time and part-time staff, full-time fellows and full-time and part-time interns.
| All Staff Percentages are based on 15 total survey responses. The numbers include full-time and part-time staff, full-time fellows and full-time and part-time interns. | Newsroom Percentages are based on 15 completed survey responses to this question. | Business Percentages are based on 15 completed survey responses to this question. | |||
| Gender Identity | Gender Identity | Gender Identity | |||
| Women | 80% | Women | 82% | Women | 75% |
| Men | 20% | Men | 18% | Men | 25% |
| Sexual Orientation | Sexual Orientation | Sexual Orientation | |||
| Straight | 87% | Straight | 82% | Straight | 100% |
| LGBTQ-identifying | 7% | LGBTQ-identifying | 7% | ||
| Not specified | 7% | Not specified | 7% | ||
| Speak a language beyond English at home | 33% | Speak a language beyond English at home | 18% | Speak a language beyond English at home | 75% |
| Race/Ethnicity | Race/Ethnicity | Race/Ethnicity | |||
| White | 67% | White | 73% | White | 50% |
| Hispanic or Latinx | 20% | Two or more races | 18% | Hispanic or Latinx | 50% |
| Two or more races | 13% | Hispanic or Latinx | 9% | ||
| Age | Age | Age | |||
| 20-29 | 40% | 20-29 | 45% | 20-29 | 25% |
| 30-39 | 47% | 30-39 | 45% | 30-39 | 50% |
| 60 or older | 13% | 60 or older | 9% | 60 or older | 25% |
* The percentages in the charts have been rounded and may not add up to 100.
Ownership Structure, Funding and Grants
inewsource is a nonprofit organization, whose legal name is Investigative Newsource. It does business as inewsource. The business was incorporated on Aug. 4, 2009 in the state of California. Tax-exempt status as a 501c3 was granted by the IRS on Sept. 15, 2010. inewsource is funded primarily by individual contributions and foundation grants. We are guided by a board of directors.
Editorial independence: Journalists employed by inewsource take no editorial direction from donors whose contributions may support the organization. inewsource will not hesitate to report on its donors when events warrant. Our Editorial Independence Policy details the firewall between journalism and revenue.
To be transparent with the public, inewsource lists its donors on its website. In cases where a donor is the subject of an inewsource story, additional disclosure will be made.
Financial Documents
We do our due diligence to earn your trust in our reporting, as well as in our governance and financial sustainability. All of our financial documents are made available to view so that our supporters can trust we are sound stewards of your philanthropy. Review our IRS Form 990s, audited financial statements and annual reports:
Tax Returns
Financial Statements
Annual Reports
Fact-checking and Verification Standards
Transparency is one of our core values. Today, there is a need to build trust with our audience because new media and ways of communicating spread lies and slanted news faster than “real” news. At the same time, this era of new technologies makes it easier than ever for news organizations to be transparent. People don’t just have to believe us, they can investigate our investigations with our source materials.
Transparency is key to building credibility.
inewsource reporters have primary responsibility for reporting, writing, and fact-checking their stories. But before a story is published, the reporter reviews all facts and sources with an editor or another reporter. Facts must be traced to a primary source.
In addition, we “transparify” certain investigative stories. This process involves publishing a version of the web story with hyperlinks to all the story’s facts. This is proof that all facts have been documented with primary evidence. We do this to build trust with our readers and to be as transparent as we hope the public figures and institutions that we hold accountable will be.
Unnamed Sources
Not all sources are created equal. Some sources cannot speak authoritatively, provide proper analysis or speak specifically to every inquiry placed before them. To maintain the integrity of our reporting, inewsource reporters must select sources who can speak with validity to the topic at hand, and avoid presenting unqualified or underqualified sources as experts.
If an interviewed source has a conflict of interest, or whose qualifications may be tangential or limited, reporters will note that within the context of the story.
It is incumbent upon reporters to fully background their sources to uncover conflicts of interest or slant prior to using them in a story.
Unless discussed prior to an interview, all subjects talking to inewsource journalists are on the record. Specifically, the source is identified by name and title, and their exact or paraphrased words are attributed to them for publication. If journalists speak with sources who are not politicians, public figures or those not commonly interviewed by journalists, staff should explain clearly that information discussed will be on the record and for publication.
There are times, however, when information may be critical for a story but cannot be found or verified by other means. For example, a source may be able to confirm specific information about a series of events they may have witnessed, but have legitimate concerns about using their name or title. The repercussions to the source could be legal, job-related retribution or personal safety. The source and journalist must discuss these potential dangers and terms of use should be agreed upon by both parties.
If inewsource publishes information from an anonymous source, inewsource will explain to readers, in as much detail as possible, why we agreed to anonymity.
Corrections and Clarifications
inewsource strives for accuracy in everything we do, which is why we are committed to fact checking our content. But sometimes we make errors. When that happens, we correct them. We also clarify stories when something we’ve written is confusing or could be misinterpreted.
We endeavor to always be transparent about our commitment to correcting errors and clarifying misperceptions. When staffers see, hear or read about a possible issue with the accuracy of any inewsource content, they are expected to bring it to the attention of an editor and the web producer so it can be evaluated to determine how to proceed.
Including the web producer is key because inewsource is a multimedia news organization and shares its content with multiple partners on multiple platforms. The web producer must alert these partners about corrections and clarifications.
Corrections and clarifications should be included at the bottom of stories and dated.
Actionable Feedback and Newsroom Contacts
Our audiences know the region we cover and have a stake in maintaining and improving the quality of life in San Diego and Imperial counties. We know your knowledge and insights can help shape what we cover and how we cover it. We invite your comments and complaints on news stories, suggestions for issues to cover or sources to consult. We rely on you to tell us when we get it right and when we need to keep pushing.
Your comments, questions and suggestions can be sent to the team as a whole at contact@inewsource.org or you can contact a specific member of our staff.
Masthead
CEO, Editor and Founder: Lorie Hearn, loriehearn@inewsource.org
Lorie Hearn is the chief executive officer, editor and founder of inewsource. She founded inewsource in the summer of 2009, following a successful reporting and editing career in newspapers. She retired from The San Diego Union-Tribune, where she had been a reporter, Metro Editor and finally the senior editor for Metro and Watchdog Journalism. In addition to department oversight, Hearn personally managed a four-person watchdog team, composed of two data specialists and two investigative reporters. Hearn was a Nieman Foundation fellow at Harvard University in 1994-95. She focused on juvenile justice and drug control policy, a natural course to follow her years as a courts and legal affairs reporter at the San Diego Union and then the Union-Tribune.
Hearn became Metro Editor in 1999 and oversaw regional and city news coverage, which included the city of San Diego’s financial debacle and near bankruptcy. Reporters and editors on Metro during her tenure were part of the Pulitzer Prize-winning stories that exposed Congressman Randy “Duke” Cunningham and led to his imprisonment.
Hearn began her journalism career as a reporter for the Bucks County Courier Times, a small daily outside of Philadelphia, shortly after graduating from the University of Delaware. During the decades following, she moved through countless beats at five newspapers on both coasts.
High-profile coverage included the historic state Supreme Court election in 1986, when three sitting justices were ousted from the bench, and the 1992 execution of Robert Alton Harris. That gas chamber execution was the first time the death penalty was carried out in California in 25 years.
In her nine years as Metro Editor at the Union-Tribune, Hearn made watchdog reporting a priority. Her reporters produced award-winning investigations covering large and small local governments. The depth and breadth of their public service work was most evident in coverage of the wildfires of 2003 and then 2007, when more than half a million people were evacuated from their homes.
Managing Editor: Mark J. Rochester, markrochester@inewsource.org
Mark J. Rochester began as inewsource managing editor in April 2021, having served as editor in chief at Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative newsroom in Manhattan. He was previously senior news director for investigations at the Detroit Free Press. Both newsrooms, he notes, shared a commitment to diversity and inclusion, and their investigative journalism often received national recognition for exposing problems impacting communities of color.
His family looks forward to returning to California, having spent more than seven years in San Francisco where Rochester was a senior manager for the Associated Press. While with the news cooperative, he led computer-assisted reporting training efforts around the West, both inside and outside of AP, and conducted a widely used analysis of the $74 million in campaign contributions that went toward the California gay marriage ballot initiative in 2008. The AP analyzed who gave and why and then made the data available to member newspapers. The resulting series of stories based on the data was AP’s 2009 Pulitzer nomination for Local Reporting.
Rochester, who served as a Pulitzer Prize jurist in 2017, also has held senior leadership positions at the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, The Denver Post, Newsday and The Indianapolis Star. Rochester is vice president of Investigative Reporters & Editors Inc., the 6,000+ member international organization dedicated to improving investigative journalism. He also serves on the national advisory board of the Investigative Reporting Workshop at American University in Washington, D.C.
Byline Policy
Most of our articles carry a byline to identify the author. In some cases, inewsource will use a brand byline such as “Staff” or “inewsource” for internal or editorial information about the newsroom. In these instances, inewsource‘s Editor and Managing Editor are responsible for content that uses a brand byline.
The Trust Project
inewsource is proud to be a member of The Trust Project and support efforts to increase transparency in journalism by displaying the 8 Trust Indicators on our stories. We launched the Trust Indicators on Sep. 16, 2020.
Privacy Policy
inewsource has prepared this Privacy Policy to explain how we collect, use, protect, and share information when you use our inewsource.org website (the “Site“) or when you use any of our services (the “Services“).
By using the Site or Services you consent to this Privacy Policy.
Log Data
Like many site operators, we collect information that your browser sends whenever you visit our site (“Log Data”).
This Log Data may include information such as your computer’s Internet Protocol (“IP”) address, browser type, browser version, the pages of our site that you visit, the time and date of your visit, the time spent on those pages and other statistics.
Cookies
Cookies are files with small amount of data, which may include an anonymous unique identifier. Cookies are sent to your browser from a web site and stored on your computer or mobile device.
Like many sites, we use “cookies” to collect information. You can instruct your browser to refuse all cookies or to indicate when a cookie is being sent. However, if you do not accept cookies, you may not be able to use some portions of our site.
Certain pages on our site may set other third party cookies. For example, we may embed content, such as videos, from another site that sets a cookie. While we try to minimize these third party cookies, we can’t always control what cookies this third party content sets.
Additionally, we may use third party services — such as those that provide social media conveniences, measure traffic, send newsletters and facilitate donations — that may place cookies on your computer. We don’t have any way of knowing how such services handle the resulting data internally. inewsource makes no claim, nor takes liability for the insecure submission of information via these applications.
Here are the services whose cookies you can find on inewsource.org:
- Sharing buttons for Facebook and Twitter. These use the standard scripts provided by each company.
- Google Analytics, which we use to measure site traffic. Google Analytics gathers certain non-personally identifying information over time, such as your IP address, browser type, internet service provider, referring and exit pages, time stamp, and similar data. We also use Facebook Pixel to measure, optimize and build audiences for advertising campaigns served on Facebook. In particular it enables us to see how our users move between devices when accessing our website and Facebook, to ensure that our Facebook advertising is seen by our users most likely to be interested in such advertising by analyzing which content a user has viewed and interacted with on our website.
- Stripe, which allows us to accept donations through our website.
- Salesforce to manage newsletter subscriber, donor, and other identifiable user data.
- Mailchimp, to manage newsletter distributions. We collect your email address if you choose to subscribe to one of our email newsletters or email news alerts. Other optional information that you enter when subscribing – such as your first and last names or city are simply so that we can deliver more personalized email newsletters. We DO NOT sell, rent or market your information to any other parties. We retain your information only as long as necessary to provide your service. When we send emails, it collects some data about which users open the emails and which links are clicked. We use this information to optimize our email newsletters and, as aggregate information, to explain what percentage of our users open and interact with our newsletters.
Personal Data
We only collect personally identifiable information such as your name and email address when you sign up for a newsletter, donate to our organization, or otherwise submit it to us voluntarily. We do not share your personal data with any third parties other than some common service providers, whose products use your information to help us improve our site, deliver newsletters, or allow us to offer donation opportunities.
inewsource limits access to all user data for the purposes of newsletter, fundraising, and customer service only. User data is not sold to or otherwise shared with anyone not working with or for the inewsource.
You may unsubscribe or opt-out of our email and mail communications at any time by hitting the “unsubscribe” button in any email you receive from inewsource, or by emailing us at contact@inewsource.org or calling us at 619-594-5100.
Donor Information
The identities of all donors will be listed on our website. inewsource does not share, trade, sell, or otherwise release donors’ personal information to any third parties.
Refunds
If you encounter errors when donating on the website, please contact us at members@inewsource.org. For example, if you submit a donation for an incorrect amount or make a duplicate transaction please email us immediately so we can reverse the charges.
Cancellation of Recurring Donations
You can cancel your monthly recurring donations free of charge by notifying us at members@inewsource.org.
Links to Other Websites
Our site may contain links to documents, resources or other websites that we think may be of interest to you. We have no control over these other sites or their content. You should be aware when you leave our site for another, and remember that other sites are governed by their own user agreements and privacy policies, which should be available to you to read.
Disclaimers and Limitation of Liability
Although we take reasonable steps to prevent the introduction of viruses, worms, “Trojan Horses” or other destructive materials to our site, we do not guarantee or warrant that our site or materials that may be downloaded from our site are free from such destructive features. We are not liable for any damages or harm attributable to such features. We are not liable for any claim, loss or injust based on errors, omissions, interruptions or other inaccuracies on our site, nor for any claim, loss or injust that results from your use of this site or your breach of any provision of this User Agreement.
Contact Us
If there are any questions regarding this privacy policy, please contact us at contact@inewsource.org or call us at 619-594-5100.
Ethics Policy
This policy can be found on this page.
Diversity Statement
This policy can be found on this page.
Diversity Staffing Report
This policy can be found on this page.
Corrections Policy
This policy can be found on this page.
Ownership Structure, Funding
This policy can be found on this page.
Founding Date
2009-11-01
Masthead
This policy can be found on this page.
Mission Statement with Coverage Priorities
This policy can be found on this page.
Fact-checking Standards
This policy can be found on this page.
Unnamed Sources Policy
This policy can be found on this page.
Article Post Types
post
What I find particularly strange about San Diego and it’s airport is the fact that it lies right in the heart of the city! Every other airport I’ve ever been too has had their airport in a more rural or industrial location… I’ve lived near the landing flight path and it was easy to get used to the sounds of planes landing, but the take offs have literally stopped rock concerts that I’ve played at Liberty station! What I also wonder is where fine funds are allocated for the public good… Great job Chris and Leo!