When San Diego Hospice filed for bankruptcy and closed its doors for good in 2013, it was amid allegations the venerable institution owed the federal government more than $110 million in false Medicare claims.
[one_half][box type=”shadow this-matters”]The hospice, which closed while undergoing a Medicare audit, was considered a pioneering organization in end-of-life care.[/box][/one_half]
The hospice was accused of providing care to people who were not terminal — in other words, not dying within the six months Medicare prescribed for the hospice benefit.
Kathleen Pacurar, CEO of the hospice, told board members there was no alternative but to shut down.
Three years later, the federal government answered the Freedom of Information request submitted by inewsource and KPBS, and released the Medicare audit. The results are damning, but not nearly as dire as the public and board of directors of San Diego Hospice were led to believe.
Key officials now believe the hospice could have survived the scrutiny and the financial hit.
The audit found Medicare overpaid San Diego Hospice more than $10 million in Medicare billings over about a two-year period, a fraction of what was predicted. But it also found that patients were in hospice for an average of two years, four times longer than the six-month terminal prognosis required to receive the benefit.
inewsource recently showed the results of the audit to sources close to the story. None had previously seen the audit, including Pacurar, the hospice CEO who recommended the shutdown.
Some said the hospice never should have closed its doors.
“Ten million dollars was not a reason to shut a program down,” said J. Donald Schumacher, president and CEO of the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization.
San Diego Hospice “was the mother ship in many ways of our industry, and I think it could have been handled much differently,” Schumacher said.
Laurel Herbst, the hospice’s founding medical director, agreed. “Under different leadership, it (San Diego Hospice) would have survived,” she said.
At its peak, San Diego Hospice cared for 1,000 terminally ill patients a day. It was a national founder and leader in hospice care. In the region, it was revered and supported by philanthropists, with McDonald’s heiress Joan Kroc among its largest benefactors.
The public dismantling of the hospice began in November 2012, when Pacurar, who became CEO in 2010, took the unusual step of going to The San Diego Union-Tribune to tell editorial staff the hospice was in the middle of a Medicare audit and may have to return millions of dollars to the federal government. She told hospice board members that number could be $50 million.
The story landed on the front page, outlining how Pacurar planned to lay off employees, although she hadn’t seen the audit results.
“The organization, after the first of the year, will look extraordinarily different than it does today,” Pacurar told the U-T.
“It will be smaller. It will focus solely on the great care of hospice patients,” she said.
A day later, two top executives resigned, and weeks later the hospice shut down its Hillcrest inpatient hospital.
The organization filed for bankruptcy, and on Feb. 13, 2013, Pacurar announced that after 30 years it would shut down, citing the unresolved Medicare audit.
“In our circumstance, the lack of interactions (with Medicare) and information has truly caused us to be in the situation we’re facing today,” Pacurar told inewsource at the time.
The final document inewsource received was dated 2014, a year after the hospice shut down.
Pacurar, reached by phone last week, said she has never seen the audit and was informed of the results by an inewsource reporter.
“I don’t know what to say about it,” she said.
Medicare never contacted her and never gave her the bottom line of what was owed, she said.
When asked why she told board members it could be as much as $50 million, she said she didn’t know “which ones (media stories) to believe.”
“I have no idea,” she said.
The federal government referred to the $50 million estimate Pacurar had given board members in one bankruptcy court document.
“Debtor itself has estimated its liability to the United States at $50 million,” attorneys for the government wrote.
The Department of Justice, which claimed in Bankruptcy Court that San Diego Hospice owed it $112 million, declined to comment for this story because related litigation is pending. Bankruptcy proceedings are winding down, but as inewsourcereported in 2014, the government had reached a settlement with the hospice. It received $1 million of the $16 million the hospice has in assets.
The results of the audit are likely moot considering the hospice no longer exists and the statute of limitations for filing fraud charges has passed. When asked whether anyone is on the hook for $10 million, a Medicare spokesman said the government agency had no further comment on the matter.
Herbst, the founding medical director of the hospice in 1978, held the position until February 2011 when Pacurar became CEO and asked Herbst to retire. Until now, Herbst was afraid to speak publicly about the audit and the bankruptcy, worried she could be prosecuted under the false claims act as a person accountable for providing care for those whom the government determined ineligible.
It’s been five years since she left her post, so she can no longer face charges.
“I would have appealed it (the results of the audit) case by case,” Herbst said.
She’s adamant San Diego Hospice did nothing wrong, and she said had she been given the chance she would have demonstrated to Medicare that all of the hospice’s patients fit the terminal definition.
“I was pretty angry when this all came down,” Herbst said. “It was my life’s work.”
Herbst said she successfully appealed the results of a 1997 government audit by the Office of the Inspector General for Health and Human Services, which found 37 patients shouldn’t have been in care.
inewsourcefirst reported in 2013 that those who knew the inner workings of San Diego Hospice said the organization was founded on the principle that money should never matter in someone’s dying days. And it continued under that philosophy until 2011, when senior management, which included Herbst, changed and the federal government began its crackdown on hospices.
Pacurar said she inherited the problems that led to the federal scrutiny of San Diego Hospice, and she did her best to lead it through its most difficult times. She said she has no regrets.
“It was unfortunate I had to be part of the dismantling of the organization, but with Scripps coming in purchasing the building and other hospices being able to grow out of it, I’m very proud of that.”
Scripps Health began offering hospice care the day after San Diego Hospice filed for bankruptcy and Pacurar publicly endorsed it for doing so. Scripps also hired 74 San Diego Hospice employees who had lost their jobs in the shutdown, and it eventually bought San Diego Hospice’s Hillcrest location. Scripps now has an average daily census of 180 hospice patients, according to a spokesman. And the Hillcrest location houses the administrative offices for Scripps home health, hospice and home-based care.
Medicare had little to say about the results of the audit or whether there were other investigations that may provide insight as to why the federal government made such an enormous claim against San Diego Hospice in its bankruptcy filing.
Schumaker, from the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization, said he believes the information Pacurar gave to the news media early on in the scandal was unintentionally incorrect.
“I think there was nothing malicious in what she was doing. It was her attempt to resolve the issue. But I think it could have gone a different way had there been a different CEO,” he said.
Schumaker also believes San Diego Hospice could have negotiated a settlement with Medicare, which is what hospices across the country have done when they found themselves in a similar predicament.
While the institution is now gone, Herbst is thankful for its legacy and a lifetime she invested in caring for dying patients.
“That training is still going on in the world from the people that I taught,” she said. “The loss is terrible for the community, but the long-term impact is still going to be there for many, many years for the whole country.”
inewsource is a nonprofit, nonpartisan newsroom dedicated to improving lives in the San Diego region and beyond through impactful, data-based investigative and accountability journalism.
Our Vision
Betrayals of the public trust are revealed and rectified, wrongdoing is deterred, and inequities are illuminated thanks to inewsource’s deep, dogged, fact-based reporting.
Our Values
Truth: Above all else, we value the importance of a free and credible press. Truth is the cornerstone of democracy and the core value for inewsource.
Transparency: We build trust with our readers by adhering to the highest standards and ethics, and to reporting with facts, precision and context.
Collaboration: Our newsroom prioritizes collaboration over competition. We regularly partner with media outlets on reporting projects and to share content.
Community: Our reporting serves the San Diego region, and we strive to build relationships with our audience by getting out into the community to listen and engage.
Ethics Policy
inewsource will conduct its business with the highest standards of decency, fairness and accuracy. These standards shall apply equally to inewsource employees, freelancers and all others engaged in gathering information on behalf of inewsource. All receive a copy of these ethical standards.
In the course of our reporting, we will consistently:
● Identify our organization and ourselves fully and avoid false representations of any kind to any source.
● Obtain consent from all parties before electronically recording any interview or conversation except in extraordinary cases authorized by the Managing Editor and Editor. If a source refuses to be taped, that must be honored; no recordings are to be made without consent.
● Respect the individual’s right to privacy. inewsource will never manipulate or barter private, personal, health, financial or other extraneous information in the course of preparing its reports.
● Any source we describe or write about in any significant manner must be contacted. The employee should document all efforts to contact the source, and if unsuccessful, should summarize these efforts at contact in the body of his/her writing.
In addition, inewsource follows the Code of Ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists. The latest version, revised in 2014, can be found here.
Our organization retains full authority over editorial content to protect the best journalistic and business interests of our organization. We will maintain a firewall between news coverage decisions and sources of all revenue. Acceptance of financial support does not constitute implied or actual endorsement of donors or their products, services or opinions.
We accept gifts, grants and sponsorships from individuals and organizations for the general support of our activities, but our news judgments are made independently and not on the basis of donor support. Our organization also may consider donations to support the coverage of particular topics, but our organization maintains editorial control of the coverage. We will cede no right of review or influence of editorial content, nor of unauthorized distribution of editorial content.
Our organization will make public all donors who give a total of $1,000 or more. We will accept anonymous donations for general support only if it is clear that sufficient safeguards have been put into place that the expenditure of that donation is made independently by our organization and in compliance with INN’s Membership Standards.
Diversity
Diverse Voices
Inclusiveness is at the heart of thinking and acting as journalists, and it supports the educational mandate of inewsource. Race, class, generation, gender, sexual orientation, ability, and geography all affect point of view. inewsource believes that reflecting societal differences in reporting leads to better, more nuanced stories and a better-informed community.
inewsource is committed to employment equity and diversity.
Diverse Staffing Report
Below is a breakdown of staffing data at inewsource. We determine the composition of our staff by asking them to self-identify. It is based on a newsroom of 11 and a total staff of 15 as of August 2020. Percentages are based on 15 total survey responses. The numbers include full-time and part-time staff, full-time fellows and full-time and part-time interns.
All Staff Percentages are based on 15 total survey responses. The numbers include full-time and part-time staff, full-time fellows and full-time and part-time interns.
Newsroom Percentages are based on 15 completed survey responses to this question.
Business Percentages are based on 15 completed survey responses to this question.
Gender Identity
Gender Identity
Gender Identity
Women
80%
Women
82%
Women
75%
Men
20%
Men
18%
Men
25%
Sexual Orientation
Sexual Orientation
Sexual Orientation
Straight
87%
Straight
82%
Straight
100%
LGBTQ-identifying
7%
LGBTQ-identifying
7%
Not specified
7%
Not specified
7%
Speak a language beyond English at home
33%
Speak a language beyond English at home
18%
Speak a language beyond English at home
75%
Race/Ethnicity
Race/Ethnicity
Race/Ethnicity
White
67%
White
73%
White
50%
Hispanic or Latinx
20%
Two or more races
18%
Hispanic or Latinx
50%
Two or more races
13%
Hispanic or Latinx
9%
Age
Age
Age
20-29
40%
20-29
45%
20-29
25%
30-39
47%
30-39
45%
30-39
50%
60 or older
13%
60 or older
9%
60 or older
25%
* The percentages in the charts have been rounded and may not add up to 100.
Ownership Structure, Funding and Grants
inewsource is a nonprofit organization, whose legal name is Investigative Newsource. It does business as inewsource. The business was incorporated on Aug. 4, 2009 in the state of California. Tax-exempt status as a 501c3 was granted by the IRS on Sept. 15, 2010. inewsource is funded primarily by individual contributions and foundation grants. We are guided by a board of directors.
Editorial independence: Journalists employed by inewsource take no editorial direction from donors whose contributions may support the organization. inewsource will not hesitate to report on its donors when events warrant. Our Editorial Independence Policy details the firewall between journalism and revenue.
To be transparent with the public, inewsourcelists its donors on its website. In cases where a donor is the subject of an inewsource story, additional disclosure will be made.
Financial Documents
We do our due diligence to earn your trust in our reporting, as well as in our governance and financial sustainability. All of our financial documents are made available to view so that our supporters can trust we are sound stewards of your philanthropy. Review our IRS Form 990s, audited financial statements and annual reports:
Transparency is one of our core values. Today, there is a need to build trust with our audience because new media and ways of communicating spread lies and slanted news faster than “real” news. At the same time, this era of new technologies makes it easier than ever for news organizations to be transparent. People don’t just have to believe us, they can investigate our investigations with our source materials.
Transparency is key to building credibility.
inewsource reporters have primary responsibility for reporting, writing, and fact-checking their stories. But before a story is published, the reporter reviews all facts and sources with an editor or another reporter. Facts must be traced to a primary source.
In addition, we “transparify” certain investigative stories. This process involves publishing a version of the web story with hyperlinks to all the story’s facts. This is proof that all facts have been documented with primary evidence. We do this to build trust with our readers and to be as transparent as we hope the public figures and institutions that we hold accountable will be.
Unnamed Sources
Not all sources are created equal. Some sources cannot speak authoritatively, provide proper analysis or speak specifically to every inquiry placed before them. To maintain the integrity of our reporting, inewsource reporters must select sources who can speak with validity to the topic at hand, and avoid presenting unqualified or underqualified sources as experts.
If an interviewed source has a conflict of interest, or whose qualifications may be tangential or limited, reporters will note that within the context of the story.
It is incumbent upon reporters to fully background their sources to uncover conflicts of interest or slant prior to using them in a story.
Unless discussed prior to an interview, all subjects talking to inewsource journalists are on the record. Specifically, the source is identified by name and title, and their exact or paraphrased words are attributed to them for publication. If journalists speak with sources who are not politicians, public figures or those not commonly interviewed by journalists, staff should explain clearly that information discussed will be on the record and for publication.
There are times, however, when information may be critical for a story but cannot be found or verified by other means. For example, a source may be able to confirm specific information about a series of events they may have witnessed, but have legitimate concerns about using their name or title. The repercussions to the source could be legal, job-related retribution or personal safety. The source and journalist must discuss these potential dangers and terms of use should be agreed upon by both parties.
If inewsource publishes information from an anonymous source, inewsource will explain to readers, in as much detail as possible, why we agreed to anonymity.
Corrections and Clarifications
inewsource strives for accuracy in everything we do, which is why we are committed to fact checking our content. But sometimes we make errors. When that happens, we correct them. We also clarify stories when something we’ve written is confusing or could be misinterpreted.
We endeavor to always be transparent about our commitment to correcting errors and clarifying misperceptions. When staffers see, hear or read about a possible issue with the accuracy of any inewsource content, they are expected to bring it to the attention of an editor and the web producer so it can be evaluated to determine how to proceed.
Including the web producer is key because inewsource is a multimedia news organization and shares its content with multiple partners on multiple platforms. The web producer must alert these partners about corrections and clarifications.
Corrections and clarifications should be included at the bottom of stories and dated.
Actionable Feedback and Newsroom Contacts
Our audiences know the region we cover and have a stake in maintaining and improving the quality of life in San Diego and Imperial counties. We know your knowledge and insights can help shape what we cover and how we cover it. We invite your comments and complaints on news stories, suggestions for issues to cover or sources to consult. We rely on you to tell us when we get it right and when we need to keep pushing.
Your comments, questions and suggestions can be sent to the team as a whole at contact@inewsource.org or you can contact a specific member of our staff.
Lorie Hearn is the chief executive officer, editor and founder of inewsource. She founded inewsource in the summer of 2009, following a successful reporting and editing career in newspapers. She retired from The San Diego Union-Tribune, where she had been a reporter, Metro Editor and finally the senior editor for Metro and Watchdog Journalism. In addition to department oversight, Hearn personally managed a four-person watchdog team, composed of two data specialists and two investigative reporters. Hearn was a Nieman Foundation fellow at Harvard University in 1994-95. She focused on juvenile justice and drug control policy, a natural course to follow her years as a courts and legal affairs reporter at the San Diego Union and then the Union-Tribune.
Hearn became Metro Editor in 1999 and oversaw regional and city news coverage, which included the city of San Diego’s financial debacle and near bankruptcy. Reporters and editors on Metro during her tenure were part of the Pulitzer Prize-winning stories that exposed Congressman Randy “Duke” Cunningham and led to his imprisonment.
Hearn began her journalism career as a reporter for the Bucks County Courier Times, a small daily outside of Philadelphia, shortly after graduating from the University of Delaware. During the decades following, she moved through countless beats at five newspapers on both coasts.
High-profile coverage included the historic state Supreme Court election in 1986, when three sitting justices were ousted from the bench, and the 1992 execution of Robert Alton Harris. That gas chamber execution was the first time the death penalty was carried out in California in 25 years.
In her nine years as Metro Editor at the Union-Tribune, Hearn made watchdog reporting a priority. Her reporters produced award-winning investigations covering large and small local governments. The depth and breadth of their public service work was most evident in coverage of the wildfires of 2003 and then 2007, when more than half a million people were evacuated from their homes.
Laura Wingard is the managing editor at inewsource. She has been an editor in San Diego since 2002, working at The San Diego Union-Tribune, KPBS and now inewsource. At the Union-Tribune, she served in a variety of roles including as enterprise editor, government editor, public safety and legal affairs editor, and metro editor. She directed the newspaper’s award-winning coverage of the October 2007 wildfires and the 2010 disappearance of Poway teenager Chelsea King. She also oversaw reporting on San Diego’s pension crisis.
For two years, Wingard was news and digital editor at KPBS, overseeing a team of four multimedia reporters and two web producers. She also was the KPBS liaison with inewsource and collaborated with inewsource chief executive officer and editor Lorie Hearn on investigative work by both news organizations.
Wingard also worked at the Las Vegas Review-Journal as the city editor and as an award-winning reporter covering the environment and politics. She also was the assistant managing editor for metro at The Press-Enterprise in Riverside. She earned her bachelor’s degree at California State University, Fullerton, with a double major in communications/journalism and political science.
Brad Racino is the assistant editor and a senior reporter at inewsource. He has produced investigations for print, radio and TV on topics including political corruption, transportation, health, maritime, education and nonprofits.
His cross-platform reporting for inewsource has earned more than 50 awards since 2012, including back-to-back national medals from Investigative Reporters and Editors, two national Edward R. Murrow awards, a Meyer “Mike” Berger award from New York City’s Columbia Journalism School, the Sol Price Award for Responsible Journalism, San Diego SPJ’s First Amendment Award, and a national Emmy nomination.
In 2017, Racino was selected by the Institute for Nonprofit News as one of 10 “Emerging Leaders” in U.S. nonprofit journalism.
Racino has worked as a reporter and database analyst for News21; as a photographer, videographer and reporter for the Columbia Missourian; as a project coordinator for the National Freedom of Information Coalition and as a videographer and editor for Verizon Fios1 TV in New York. He received his master’s degree in journalism from the University of Missouri in 2012.
Byline Policy
Most of our articles carry a byline to identify the author. In some cases, inewsource will use a brand byline such as “Staff” or “inewsource” for internal or editorial information about the newsroom. In these instances, inewsource‘s Editor and Managing Editor are responsible for content that uses a brand byline.
The Trust Project
inewsource is proud to be a member of The Trust Project and support efforts to increase transparency in journalism by displaying the 8 Trust Indicators on our stories. We launched the Trust Indicators on Sep. 16, 2020.
Privacy Policy
inewsource has prepared this Privacy Policy to explain how we collect, use, protect, and share information when you use our inewsource.org website (the “Site“) or when you use any of our services (the “Services“).
By using the Site or Services you consent to this Privacy Policy.
Log Data
Like many site operators, we collect information that your browser sends whenever you visit our site (“Log Data”).
This Log Data may include information such as your computer’s Internet Protocol (“IP”) address, browser type, browser version, the pages of our site that you visit, the time and date of your visit, the time spent on those pages and other statistics.
Cookies
Cookies are files with small amount of data, which may include an anonymous unique identifier. Cookies are sent to your browser from a web site and stored on your computer or mobile device.
Like many sites, we use “cookies” to collect information. You can instruct your browser to refuse all cookies or to indicate when a cookie is being sent. However, if you do not accept cookies, you may not be able to use some portions of our site.
Certain pages on our site may set other third party cookies. For example, we may embed content, such as videos, from another site that sets a cookie. While we try to minimize these third party cookies, we can’t always control what cookies this third party content sets.
Additionally, we may use third party services — such as those that provide social media conveniences, measure traffic, send newsletters and facilitate donations — that may place cookies on your computer. We don’t have any way of knowing how such services handle the resulting data internally. inewsource makes no claim, nor takes liability for the insecure submission of information via these applications.
Here are the services whose cookies you can find on inewsource.org:
Sharing buttons for Facebook and Twitter. These use the standard scripts provided by each company.
Google Analytics, which we use to measure site traffic. Google Analytics gathers certain non-personally identifying information over time, such as your IP address, browser type, internet service provider, referring and exit pages, time stamp, and similar data. We also use Facebook Pixel to measure, optimize and build audiences for advertising campaigns served on Facebook. In particular it enables us to see how our users move between devices when accessing our website and Facebook, to ensure that our Facebook advertising is seen by our users most likely to be interested in such advertising by analyzing which content a user has viewed and interacted with on our website.
Stripe, which allows us to accept donations through our website.
Salesforce to manage newsletter subscriber, donor, and other identifiable user data.
Mailchimp, to manage newsletter distributions. We collect your email address if you choose to subscribe to one of our email newsletters or email news alerts. Other optional information that you enter when subscribing – such as your first and last names or city are simply so that we can deliver more personalized email newsletters. We DO NOT sell, rent or market your information to any other parties. We retain your information only as long as necessary to provide your service. When we send emails, it collects some data about which users open the emails and which links are clicked. We use this information to optimize our email newsletters and, as aggregate information, to explain what percentage of our users open and interact with our newsletters.
Personal Data
We only collect personally identifiable information such as your name and email address when you sign up for a newsletter, donate to our organization, or otherwise submit it to us voluntarily. We do not share your personal data with any third parties other than some common service providers, whose products use your information to help us improve our site, deliver newsletters, or allow us to offer donation opportunities.
inewsource limits access to all user data for the purposes of newsletter, fundraising, and customer service only. User data is not sold to or otherwise shared with anyone not working with or for the inewsource.
You may unsubscribe or opt-out of our email and mail communications at any time by hitting the “unsubscribe” button in any email you receive from inewsource, or by emailing us at contact@inewsource.org or calling us at 619-594-5100.
Donor Information
The identities of all donors will be listed on our website. inewsource does not share, trade, sell, or otherwise release donors’ personal information to any third parties.
Refunds
If you encounter errors when donating on the website, please contact us at members@inewsource.org. For example, if you submit a donation for an incorrect amount or make a duplicate transaction please email us immediately so we can reverse the charges.
Cancellation of Recurring Donations
You can cancel your monthly recurring donations free of charge by notifying us at members@inewsource.org.
Links to Other Websites
Our site may contain links to documents, resources or other websites that we think may be of interest to you. We have no control over these other sites or their content. You should be aware when you leave our site for another, and remember that other sites are governed by their own user agreements and privacy policies, which should be available to you to read.
Disclaimers and Limitation of Liability
Although we take reasonable steps to prevent the introduction of viruses, worms, “Trojan Horses” or other destructive materials to our site, we do not guarantee or warrant that our site or materials that may be downloaded from our site are free from such destructive features. We are not liable for any damages or harm attributable to such features. We are not liable for any claim, loss or injust based on errors, omissions, interruptions or other inaccuracies on our site, nor for any claim, loss or injust that results from your use of this site or your breach of any provision of this User Agreement.
Contact Us
If there are any questions regarding this privacy policy, please contact us at contact@inewsource.org or call us at 619-594-5100.
Joanne Faryon is a freelance reporter and former inewsource and KPBS reporter.
More by Joanne Faryon
3 replies on “San Diego Hospice could have been saved”
Where was the Board of Directors of this institution while all this was going on? Some were prominent San Diegans. Do they get a pass?
What was Pacurar’s background that qualified her for the CEO position? How was she selected and what was the Board of Directors doing while this very important institution was being ruined…apparently by one person? And where is she now? Hopefully not in charge of anything.
I was part of SDH for several years and stayed until we closed. It was devastating. A loss hundreds of us still grieve. Not only did we lose employment that was so much more than “a job”, the community lost a tremendous resource. While upper mgt’s conduct was less than ideal as the ship sank, it is only fair to point out that KP inherited years of noncompliance that wasn’t part of some malicious scheme to gain wealth at the expense of the taxpayer, but in the spirit of providing care to those in need. Many felt that upper management were less than forthcoming with staff but this problem didn’t develop overnight. As I read this yet another time since it was published last week, I cannot help but wonder what the author’s goal was in writing then publishing this article?
Where was the Board of Directors of this institution while all this was going on? Some were prominent San Diegans. Do they get a pass?
What was Pacurar’s background that qualified her for the CEO position? How was she selected and what was the Board of Directors doing while this very important institution was being ruined…apparently by one person? And where is she now? Hopefully not in charge of anything.
I was part of SDH for several years and stayed until we closed. It was devastating. A loss hundreds of us still grieve. Not only did we lose employment that was so much more than “a job”, the community lost a tremendous resource. While upper mgt’s conduct was less than ideal as the ship sank, it is only fair to point out that KP inherited years of noncompliance that wasn’t part of some malicious scheme to gain wealth at the expense of the taxpayer, but in the spirit of providing care to those in need. Many felt that upper management were less than forthcoming with staff but this problem didn’t develop overnight. As I read this yet another time since it was published last week, I cannot help but wonder what the author’s goal was in writing then publishing this article?