With California’s June 7 primary less than two weeks away, the three candidates for San Diego mayor are readying their final pitches to voters.
[one_half]
[highlight]On the radio…[/highlight]
”https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/266052294″
[/one_half]
[one_half]
[box type=”shadow this-matters”]
Information about who supports candidates can help voters make better-informed decisions.
[/box]
[/one_half]
Mayor Kevin Faulconer’s well-funded campaign and a supportive super PAC hope to steamroll his opponents and secure an outright majority and victory in June. Meanwhile, his opponents are using what little money they have to deny him a majority and force him into a November runoff.
Kevin Faulconer
Faulconer is seen as the favorite. A recent Independent Voter Network poll had the Republican at 48 percent of the vote, within the margin of error to win the race outright in June.
City elections are officially nonpartisan.
The incumbent is far and away the best-funded of the candidates. His campaign committee has raised at least $1.24 million through May 20.
More than $640,000 of that came in the committee’s first month of fundraising in June 2015.
Carl Luna, a political science professor at San Diego Mesa College, said Faulconer’s aggressive start to fundraising helped do more than finance his re-election campaign.
“It serves the purpose of keeping other people from wanting to run against you — scares off talent — and apparently that works because until earlier this year, it didn’t even look like there was going to be a Democrat running and then you got a Democrat running as an independent. So all the bigger names picked something else to go and do,” Luna said.
The three comprehensive campaign finance reports Faulconer’s campaign has filed, covering contributions through April 23, showed 2,386 individual donors contributing an average of $496.
Crucially, Faulconer has the backing of an independent committee — better known as a super PAC — created last May to support his re-election. Communities United for Tomorrow’s Economy has raised at least $632,500 through May 20. It’s sponsored by The Lincoln Club of San Diego County and the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce PAC.
Under the city’s campaign finance regulations, only people can donate to candidate campaigns. And those contributions are capped at $1,050 per election (with the primary and general election counting as separate elections). No such restrictions are placed on independent committees: They can raise unlimited amounts of money from individuals, corporations, unions and other political committees (such as PACs).
Independent committees are banned from donating to a candidate’s campaign. They can instead spend unlimited amounts of money on things like mailers, television advertisements and get-out-the-vote operations to boost a candidate. Such spending cannot be coordinated with a candidate’s campaign.
The five biggest funders backing Faulconer’s re-election — operating through Communities United — are all committees themselves.
Largest Donors to Communities United for Tomorrow’s Economy
| Rank | Donor | Contributions |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Lincoln Club of San Diego County | $235,000.00 |
| 2 | San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce PAC | $125,000.00 |
| 3 | San Diego Restaurant & Beverage PAC | $75,000.00 |
| 4 | Infrastructure PAC of the Associated General Contractors | $50,000.00 |
| 4 | Building Industry Association of San Diego County PAC | $50,000.00 |
Source: San Diego City Clerk
The largest donor to Communities United for Tomorrow’s Economy is The Lincoln Club of San Diego County.
The club, the voice of San Diego’s politically conservative business community, provided the initial seed money for the committee (along with the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce’s PAC), donating $15,000 last May 27. It followed that up with an $86,000 donation less than two weeks later.
The club’s top donor in the 2015-16 election cycle is Thomas W. Sudberry Jr., chairman of real estate development company Sudberry Properties. Sudberry had given the Lincoln Club $110,875 as of May 20.
Next is the Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation, the tribe with a casino and a golf resort near El Cajon. The band has given the club $45,000.
Rancho Guejito Corp. was the third largest donor to the club, giving $40,000. The corporation is engaged in an ongoing and at times contentious effort to develop 23,000 acres near Valley Center.
After The Lincoln Club comes the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce’s PAC. The chamber’s PAC has given $125,000 to Communities United. The chamber, along with The Lincoln Club, provided the initial funding for Communities United, pitching in $10,000 last May 27 and an additional $90,000 two weeks later.
The chamber PAC’s top donor for the 2015-16 cycle is its parent organization, which made two contributions totaling $594,325 in 2015.
The PAC’s second-largest donor, San Diego Gas & Electric owner Sempra Energy, kicked in $35,000. Cox Communications donated $30,000. And local real estate firm H.G. Fenton Co. gave $25,310.
The San Diego Restaurant & Beverage PAC was the third-largest donor to Communities United, having given $75,000 to the committee.
Its donors, as you might guess from the PAC’s name, overwhelmingly hail from the food service industry.
Its top 2015-16 election cycle donor is Whisknladle Hospitality LLC. The La Jolla-based owner of five restaurants has given two $4,000 contributions to the PAC since the start of 2015.
Clocking in at $6,300, the second-biggest giver to the Restaurant & Beverage PAC is the Brigantine Restaurant Corp., owner of a chain of eponymous seafood restaurants and the Miguel’s Cocina chain of Mexican restaurants.
The third-largest donor to the PAC is the Cohn Restaurant Group, which gave $5,300 last year. The group owns more than two dozen restaurants in and around San Diego.
Rounding out the top five donors to Communities United for Tomorrow’s Economy are the Infrastructure PAC of the Associated General Contractors and the Building Industry Association of San Diego County PAC. Each gave the pro-Faulconer super PAC $50,000.
The biggest donor for the contractors PAC was its parent organization, which forgave $113,000 worth of loans the PAC had previously taken out.
The PAC’s second-largest donor is Helix Electric Inc., which has ponied up $10,750. The locally headquartered firm’s projects include work on Qualcomm Stadium’s electronics system and an expansion of San Diego International Airport’s Terminal 2.
Three real estate companies tied for biggest donors to the Building Industry Association’s PAC, each donating $30,250 since January of last year: H.G. Fenton Co., Carlsbad-based Chelsea Investment Corp. and Cornerstone Communities, a builder of planned communities throughout San Diego County.
Ed Harris
The Democrats took a long time to get their candidate. High-profile Democrats with big war chests and expansive donor networks passed on the chance to take on Faulconer.
That’s evident in the fundraising struggles of Democratic mayoral candidate Ed Harris, who entered the race at the beginning of March, just before the filing deadline.
Harris, a former chief of the city’s lifeguards union who was appointed to fill the last eight months of Faulconer’s City Council term after a special mayoral election in 2014, has raised at least $48,363 as of May 20.
“This was an election, if you look at the recent polling, where the Democrats with a strong candidate could have possibly taken this — by a narrow margin to be sure — but could have possibly won.”-Carl Luna
His first and only comprehensive campaign finance report, covering contributions through April 23, showed 79 individual donors contributing $522 on average.
Unlike Faulconer, Harris has no super PAC backing him. His largest single donor is the San Diego County Democratic Party, which made a $20,650 contribution — the maximum allowed under city regulations — on April 20.
The party also spent $6,375 on member communications in April to back Harris. These generally take the form of mailers to registered party members touting party-endorsed candidates.
The county party’s top donors, in turn, are stalwarts of Democratic politics.
The biggest donor in the 2015-16 cycle is Protect Neighborhood Services Now, a PAC funded by the San Diego Municipal Employees Association, a labor union representing city workers. The organization has given the party $83,500 so far this cycle.
That’s followed by four other unions.
The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 569, representing workers in San Diego and Imperial Counties, gave $77,735.
The SEIU United Healthcare Workers West PAC, the State Building & Construction Trades Council of California PAC, and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees each gave $35,200.
Lori Saldaña
Lori Saldaña, who identifies herself as an independent and declared her candidacy in late January, has raised less money than Harris. Her campaign has raised at least $30,702 through May 20.
Her first and only comprehensive campaign finance report, covering contributions through April 23, showed 95 individual donors contributing $271 on average.
Among the handful of donors who have contributed the maximum $1,050 to her primary campaign are several frequent donors to liberal causes, including Lawrence Hess, owner of property management firm Lehbros Ltd., his wife, Suzanne, and Cory Briggs, a local environmental attorney and author of the Citizens’ Plan for tourism management.
Luna, the political science professor, said that if Faulconer ekes out a majority victory on June 7 against such poorly funded candidates, the Democratic Party’s failure to recruit a high-profile challenger will loom large in hindsight.
“This was an election, if you look at the recent polling, where the Democrats with a strong candidate could have possibly taken this — by a narrow margin to be sure — but could have possibly won,” Luna said. “If you don’t play the game you can’t win.”
- Editorial Standards Page
- Ethics Policy
- Diversity Statement
- Diversity Staffing Report
- Corrections Policy
- Ownership Structure, Funding
- Founding Date
- Masthead
- Mission Statement with Coverage Priorities
- Fact-checking Standards
- Unnamed Sources Policy
Editorial Standards Page
- Our Mission
- Ethics Policy
- Diversity
- Ownership Structure, Funding and Grants
- Financial Documents
- Fact-checking and Verification Standards
- Unnamed Sources
- Corrections and Clarifications
- Actionable Feedback and Newsroom Contacts
- Masthead
- Byline Policy
- The Trust Project
- Privacy Policy
Our Mission
inewsource is a nonprofit, nonpartisan newsroom dedicated to improving lives in the San Diego region and beyond through impactful, data-based investigative and accountability journalism.
Our Vision
Betrayals of the public trust are revealed and rectified, wrongdoing is deterred, and inequities are illuminated thanks to inewsource’s deep, dogged, fact-based reporting.
Our Values
Truth: Above all else, we value the importance of a free and credible press. Truth is the cornerstone of democracy and the core value for inewsource.
Transparency: We build trust with our readers by adhering to the highest standards and ethics, and to reporting with facts, precision and context.
Collaboration: Our newsroom prioritizes collaboration over competition. We regularly partner with media outlets on reporting projects and to share content.
Community: Our reporting serves the San Diego region, and we strive to build relationships with our audience by getting out into the community to listen and engage.
Ethics Policy
inewsource will conduct its business with the highest standards of decency, fairness and accuracy. These standards shall apply equally to inewsource employees, freelancers and all others engaged in gathering information on behalf of inewsource. All receive a copy of these ethical standards.
In the course of our reporting, we will consistently:
● Identify our organization and ourselves fully and avoid false representations of any kind to any source.
● Obtain consent from all parties before electronically recording any interview or conversation except in extraordinary cases authorized by the Managing Editor and Editor. If a source refuses to be taped, that must be honored; no recordings are to be made without consent.
● Respect the individual’s right to privacy. inewsource will never manipulate or barter private, personal, health, financial or other extraneous information in the course of preparing its reports.
● Any source we describe or write about in any significant manner must be contacted. The employee should document all efforts to contact the source, and if unsuccessful, should summarize these efforts at contact in the body of his/her writing.
In addition, inewsource follows the Code of Ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists. The latest version, revised in 2014, can be found here.
Editorial Independence Policy
We subscribe to standards of editorial independence adopted by the Institute for Nonprofit News (INN) as follows:
Our organization retains full authority over editorial content to protect the best journalistic and business interests of our organization. We will maintain a firewall between news coverage decisions and sources of all revenue. Acceptance of financial support does not constitute implied or actual endorsement of donors or their products, services or opinions.
We accept gifts, grants and sponsorships from individuals and organizations for the general support of our activities, but our news judgments are made independently and not on the basis of donor support. Our organization also may consider donations to support the coverage of particular topics, but our organization maintains editorial control of the coverage. We will cede no right of review or influence of editorial content, nor of unauthorized distribution of editorial content.
Our organization will make public all donors who give a total of $1,000 or more. We will accept anonymous donations for general support only if it is clear that sufficient safeguards have been put into place that the expenditure of that donation is made independently by our organization and in compliance with INN’s Membership Standards.
Diversity
Diverse Voices
Inclusiveness is at the heart of thinking and acting as journalists, and it supports the educational mandate of inewsource. Race, class, generation, gender, sexual orientation, ability, and geography all affect point of view. inewsource believes that reflecting societal differences in reporting leads to better, more nuanced stories and a better-informed community.
inewsource is committed to employment equity and diversity.
Diverse Staffing Report
Below is a breakdown of staffing data at inewsource. We determine the composition of our staff by asking them to self-identify. It is based on a newsroom of 11 and a total staff of 15 as of August 2020. Percentages are based on 15 total survey responses. The numbers include full-time and part-time staff, full-time fellows and full-time and part-time interns.
| All Staff Percentages are based on 15 total survey responses. The numbers include full-time and part-time staff, full-time fellows and full-time and part-time interns. | Newsroom Percentages are based on 15 completed survey responses to this question. | Business Percentages are based on 15 completed survey responses to this question. | |||
| Gender Identity | Gender Identity | Gender Identity | |||
| Women | 80% | Women | 82% | Women | 75% |
| Men | 20% | Men | 18% | Men | 25% |
| Sexual Orientation | Sexual Orientation | Sexual Orientation | |||
| Straight | 87% | Straight | 82% | Straight | 100% |
| LGBTQ-identifying | 7% | LGBTQ-identifying | 7% | ||
| Not specified | 7% | Not specified | 7% | ||
| Speak a language beyond English at home | 33% | Speak a language beyond English at home | 18% | Speak a language beyond English at home | 75% |
| Race/Ethnicity | Race/Ethnicity | Race/Ethnicity | |||
| White | 67% | White | 73% | White | 50% |
| Hispanic or Latinx | 20% | Two or more races | 18% | Hispanic or Latinx | 50% |
| Two or more races | 13% | Hispanic or Latinx | 9% | ||
| Age | Age | Age | |||
| 20-29 | 40% | 20-29 | 45% | 20-29 | 25% |
| 30-39 | 47% | 30-39 | 45% | 30-39 | 50% |
| 60 or older | 13% | 60 or older | 9% | 60 or older | 25% |
* The percentages in the charts have been rounded and may not add up to 100.
Ownership Structure, Funding and Grants
inewsource is a nonprofit organization, whose legal name is Investigative Newsource. It does business as inewsource. The business was incorporated on Aug. 4, 2009 in the state of California. Tax-exempt status as a 501c3 was granted by the IRS on Sept. 15, 2010. inewsource is funded primarily by individual contributions and foundation grants. We are guided by a board of directors.
Editorial independence: Journalists employed by inewsource take no editorial direction from donors whose contributions may support the organization. inewsource will not hesitate to report on its donors when events warrant. Our Editorial Independence Policy details the firewall between journalism and revenue.
To be transparent with the public, inewsource lists its donors on its website. In cases where a donor is the subject of an inewsource story, additional disclosure will be made.
Financial Documents
We do our due diligence to earn your trust in our reporting, as well as in our governance and financial sustainability. All of our financial documents are made available to view so that our supporters can trust we are sound stewards of your philanthropy. Review our IRS Form 990s, audited financial statements and annual reports:
Tax Returns
Financial Statements
Annual Reports
Fact-checking and Verification Standards
Transparency is one of our core values. Today, there is a need to build trust with our audience because new media and ways of communicating spread lies and slanted news faster than “real” news. At the same time, this era of new technologies makes it easier than ever for news organizations to be transparent. People don’t just have to believe us, they can investigate our investigations with our source materials.
Transparency is key to building credibility.
inewsource reporters have primary responsibility for reporting, writing, and fact-checking their stories. But before a story is published, the reporter reviews all facts and sources with an editor or another reporter. Facts must be traced to a primary source.
In addition, we “transparify” certain investigative stories. This process involves publishing a version of the web story with hyperlinks to all the story’s facts. This is proof that all facts have been documented with primary evidence. We do this to build trust with our readers and to be as transparent as we hope the public figures and institutions that we hold accountable will be.
Unnamed Sources
Not all sources are created equal. Some sources cannot speak authoritatively, provide proper analysis or speak specifically to every inquiry placed before them. To maintain the integrity of our reporting, inewsource reporters must select sources who can speak with validity to the topic at hand, and avoid presenting unqualified or underqualified sources as experts.
If an interviewed source has a conflict of interest, or whose qualifications may be tangential or limited, reporters will note that within the context of the story.
It is incumbent upon reporters to fully background their sources to uncover conflicts of interest or slant prior to using them in a story.
Unless discussed prior to an interview, all subjects talking to inewsource journalists are on the record. Specifically, the source is identified by name and title, and their exact or paraphrased words are attributed to them for publication. If journalists speak with sources who are not politicians, public figures or those not commonly interviewed by journalists, staff should explain clearly that information discussed will be on the record and for publication.
There are times, however, when information may be critical for a story but cannot be found or verified by other means. For example, a source may be able to confirm specific information about a series of events they may have witnessed, but have legitimate concerns about using their name or title. The repercussions to the source could be legal, job-related retribution or personal safety. The source and journalist must discuss these potential dangers and terms of use should be agreed upon by both parties.
If inewsource publishes information from an anonymous source, inewsource will explain to readers, in as much detail as possible, why we agreed to anonymity.
Corrections and Clarifications
inewsource strives for accuracy in everything we do, which is why we are committed to fact checking our content. But sometimes we make errors. When that happens, we correct them. We also clarify stories when something we’ve written is confusing or could be misinterpreted.
We endeavor to always be transparent about our commitment to correcting errors and clarifying misperceptions. When staffers see, hear or read about a possible issue with the accuracy of any inewsource content, they are expected to bring it to the attention of an editor and the web producer so it can be evaluated to determine how to proceed.
Including the web producer is key because inewsource is a multimedia news organization and shares its content with multiple partners on multiple platforms. The web producer must alert these partners about corrections and clarifications.
Corrections and clarifications should be included at the bottom of stories and dated.
Actionable Feedback and Newsroom Contacts
Our audiences know the region we cover and have a stake in maintaining and improving the quality of life in San Diego and Imperial counties. We know your knowledge and insights can help shape what we cover and how we cover it. We invite your comments and complaints on news stories, suggestions for issues to cover or sources to consult. We rely on you to tell us when we get it right and when we need to keep pushing.
Your comments, questions and suggestions can be sent to the team as a whole at contact@inewsource.org or you can contact a specific member of our staff.
Masthead
CEO, Editor and Founder: Lorie Hearn, loriehearn@inewsource.org
Lorie Hearn is the chief executive officer, editor and founder of inewsource. She founded inewsource in the summer of 2009, following a successful reporting and editing career in newspapers. She retired from The San Diego Union-Tribune, where she had been a reporter, Metro Editor and finally the senior editor for Metro and Watchdog Journalism. In addition to department oversight, Hearn personally managed a four-person watchdog team, composed of two data specialists and two investigative reporters. Hearn was a Nieman Foundation fellow at Harvard University in 1994-95. She focused on juvenile justice and drug control policy, a natural course to follow her years as a courts and legal affairs reporter at the San Diego Union and then the Union-Tribune.
Hearn became Metro Editor in 1999 and oversaw regional and city news coverage, which included the city of San Diego’s financial debacle and near bankruptcy. Reporters and editors on Metro during her tenure were part of the Pulitzer Prize-winning stories that exposed Congressman Randy “Duke” Cunningham and led to his imprisonment.
Hearn began her journalism career as a reporter for the Bucks County Courier Times, a small daily outside of Philadelphia, shortly after graduating from the University of Delaware. During the decades following, she moved through countless beats at five newspapers on both coasts.
High-profile coverage included the historic state Supreme Court election in 1986, when three sitting justices were ousted from the bench, and the 1992 execution of Robert Alton Harris. That gas chamber execution was the first time the death penalty was carried out in California in 25 years.
In her nine years as Metro Editor at the Union-Tribune, Hearn made watchdog reporting a priority. Her reporters produced award-winning investigations covering large and small local governments. The depth and breadth of their public service work was most evident in coverage of the wildfires of 2003 and then 2007, when more than half a million people were evacuated from their homes.
Managing Editor: Mark J. Rochester, markrochester@inewsource.org
Mark J. Rochester began as inewsource managing editor in April 2021, having served as editor in chief at Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative newsroom in Manhattan. He was previously senior news director for investigations at the Detroit Free Press. Both newsrooms, he notes, shared a commitment to diversity and inclusion, and their investigative journalism often received national recognition for exposing problems impacting communities of color.
His family looks forward to returning to California, having spent more than seven years in San Francisco where Rochester was a senior manager for the Associated Press. While with the news cooperative, he led computer-assisted reporting training efforts around the West, both inside and outside of AP, and conducted a widely used analysis of the $74 million in campaign contributions that went toward the California gay marriage ballot initiative in 2008. The AP analyzed who gave and why and then made the data available to member newspapers. The resulting series of stories based on the data was AP’s 2009 Pulitzer nomination for Local Reporting.
Rochester, who served as a Pulitzer Prize jurist in 2017, also has held senior leadership positions at the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, The Denver Post, Newsday and The Indianapolis Star. Rochester is vice president of Investigative Reporters & Editors Inc., the 6,000+ member international organization dedicated to improving investigative journalism. He also serves on the national advisory board of the Investigative Reporting Workshop at American University in Washington, D.C.
Byline Policy
Most of our articles carry a byline to identify the author. In some cases, inewsource will use a brand byline such as “Staff” or “inewsource” for internal or editorial information about the newsroom. In these instances, inewsource‘s Editor and Managing Editor are responsible for content that uses a brand byline.
The Trust Project
inewsource is proud to be a member of The Trust Project and support efforts to increase transparency in journalism by displaying the 8 Trust Indicators on our stories. We launched the Trust Indicators on Sep. 16, 2020.
Privacy Policy
inewsource has prepared this Privacy Policy to explain how we collect, use, protect, and share information when you use our inewsource.org website (the “Site“) or when you use any of our services (the “Services“).
By using the Site or Services you consent to this Privacy Policy.
Log Data
Like many site operators, we collect information that your browser sends whenever you visit our site (“Log Data”).
This Log Data may include information such as your computer’s Internet Protocol (“IP”) address, browser type, browser version, the pages of our site that you visit, the time and date of your visit, the time spent on those pages and other statistics.
Cookies
Cookies are files with small amount of data, which may include an anonymous unique identifier. Cookies are sent to your browser from a web site and stored on your computer or mobile device.
Like many sites, we use “cookies” to collect information. You can instruct your browser to refuse all cookies or to indicate when a cookie is being sent. However, if you do not accept cookies, you may not be able to use some portions of our site.
Certain pages on our site may set other third party cookies. For example, we may embed content, such as videos, from another site that sets a cookie. While we try to minimize these third party cookies, we can’t always control what cookies this third party content sets.
Additionally, we may use third party services — such as those that provide social media conveniences, measure traffic, send newsletters and facilitate donations — that may place cookies on your computer. We don’t have any way of knowing how such services handle the resulting data internally. inewsource makes no claim, nor takes liability for the insecure submission of information via these applications.
Here are the services whose cookies you can find on inewsource.org:
- Sharing buttons for Facebook and Twitter. These use the standard scripts provided by each company.
- Google Analytics, which we use to measure site traffic. Google Analytics gathers certain non-personally identifying information over time, such as your IP address, browser type, internet service provider, referring and exit pages, time stamp, and similar data. We also use Facebook Pixel to measure, optimize and build audiences for advertising campaigns served on Facebook. In particular it enables us to see how our users move between devices when accessing our website and Facebook, to ensure that our Facebook advertising is seen by our users most likely to be interested in such advertising by analyzing which content a user has viewed and interacted with on our website.
- Stripe, which allows us to accept donations through our website.
- Salesforce to manage newsletter subscriber, donor, and other identifiable user data.
- Mailchimp, to manage newsletter distributions. We collect your email address if you choose to subscribe to one of our email newsletters or email news alerts. Other optional information that you enter when subscribing – such as your first and last names or city are simply so that we can deliver more personalized email newsletters. We DO NOT sell, rent or market your information to any other parties. We retain your information only as long as necessary to provide your service. When we send emails, it collects some data about which users open the emails and which links are clicked. We use this information to optimize our email newsletters and, as aggregate information, to explain what percentage of our users open and interact with our newsletters.
Personal Data
We only collect personally identifiable information such as your name and email address when you sign up for a newsletter, donate to our organization, or otherwise submit it to us voluntarily. We do not share your personal data with any third parties other than some common service providers, whose products use your information to help us improve our site, deliver newsletters, or allow us to offer donation opportunities.
inewsource limits access to all user data for the purposes of newsletter, fundraising, and customer service only. User data is not sold to or otherwise shared with anyone not working with or for the inewsource.
You may unsubscribe or opt-out of our email and mail communications at any time by hitting the “unsubscribe” button in any email you receive from inewsource, or by emailing us at contact@inewsource.org or calling us at 619-594-5100.
Donor Information
The identities of all donors will be listed on our website. inewsource does not share, trade, sell, or otherwise release donors’ personal information to any third parties.
Refunds
If you encounter errors when donating on the website, please contact us at members@inewsource.org. For example, if you submit a donation for an incorrect amount or make a duplicate transaction please email us immediately so we can reverse the charges.
Cancellation of Recurring Donations
You can cancel your monthly recurring donations free of charge by notifying us at members@inewsource.org.
Links to Other Websites
Our site may contain links to documents, resources or other websites that we think may be of interest to you. We have no control over these other sites or their content. You should be aware when you leave our site for another, and remember that other sites are governed by their own user agreements and privacy policies, which should be available to you to read.
Disclaimers and Limitation of Liability
Although we take reasonable steps to prevent the introduction of viruses, worms, “Trojan Horses” or other destructive materials to our site, we do not guarantee or warrant that our site or materials that may be downloaded from our site are free from such destructive features. We are not liable for any damages or harm attributable to such features. We are not liable for any claim, loss or injust based on errors, omissions, interruptions or other inaccuracies on our site, nor for any claim, loss or injust that results from your use of this site or your breach of any provision of this User Agreement.
Contact Us
If there are any questions regarding this privacy policy, please contact us at contact@inewsource.org or call us at 619-594-5100.
I am proud of our independent, clean money campaign and small group of dedicated volunteers. They are outworking the many paid staffers, consultants, pollsters and others who are supported by millions of dollars pouring in from some of the biggest corporate polluters in the nation.
This is how the money chase works: Faulconer vetoes an increase to minimum wage, and Walmart contributes to his campaign. When will we learn what he has he done to earn the support of frackers, big oil and big tobacco?
Moreover, our campaign has underscored and exposed the deep and long-term dysfunction within City Hall. The problems now being discussed include the loss of 9-1-1 dispatchers, police officers and other essential employees, along with mismanaged affordable housing funds, and problems with other basic, core components of government.
These are just the tip of the iceberg. Sadly, many of this would never have been part of the public discussion without a campaign- despite his efforts to hide it from public view.
The fact we’ve polled so well and made such an impact with less than $50K raised from friends, family, neighbors and fellow teachers shows how weak this incumbent is. He may win outright, but those of us who care about this city won’t stop pointing out the obvious: San Diegans need and deserve better.
Come on San Diego, don’t let the big money elite, buy you off! Stand up for YOUR own best interests. Stand up for a mayor, who will be mayor for ALL San Diego! Join me in voting for a true leader and an experienced problem solver; That leader is: Lori Saldana!!! She will be a mayor for all San Diego!