The public restrooms, stripped of signage and locked, located on side of Stella Public House at Fault Line Park. Oct. 11, 216. Megan Wood, inewsource.
When the 1.3-acre Fault Line Park opened up to great fanfare in August 2015, it was hailed as a triumph for public-private partnerships and badly needed open space in East Village. It included art installations, a children’s play area, and public restrooms attached to the side of a restaurant built at the park.
The developer, Pinnacle Bayside Development, received $1.6 million in public funds from Civic San Diego in exchange for maintaining the public park and restrooms once they were built. But just two months after the park’s grand opening in August 2015, the restrooms were locked — restaurant staff said they closed them indefinitely because they attracted the neighborhood’s growing homeless population.
Now, only the restaurant’s disabled customers are allowed access.
“It became a haven for drug use and prostitution,” said bar manager Michaela Peacock. “People felt very unsafe and uncomfortable because all of those people were right on our front steps.”
The public space was the result of a 2014 contract between the city — with nonprofit Civic San Diego as its agent — and Pinnacle Bayside Development, intended to eliminate blight in East Village.
Illustration courtesy of IBI group
Pinnacle’s 46-story residential tower at Island Avenue and 15th Street, Pinnacle on the Park, is the tallest apartment building in downtown San Diego. A second tower is being constructed alongside it on what is referred to as the “super block” in East Village, a parcel of land twice the size of a typical downtown block.
The Pinnacle development is San Diego’s only public-private partnership since 2000 in which the developer was reimbursed fully for the design, construction and maintenance of a public park.
Kristine Zortman, Civic’s vice president of neighborhood investment, said the deal was “unique,” but necessary to activate open space in the area.
“There were concessions made between both sides to hopefully get what was in the best interest of the community down there, but then also to be able to facilitate the developer,” Zortman said.
Murtaza Baxamusa, a former Civic San Diego board member, said the arrangement is “strange” and not something he would have approved.
Baxamusa, who currently has a lawsuit against the city of San Diego regarding its oversight of Civic, said the agreement “highlights the key issue” of accountability between the city and Civic San Diego.
“The developer is pocketing the money, Civic (San Diego) is not doing anything about it, and we’re using the homeless as an excuse,” Baxamusa said. “It’s not right.”
Nonprofit Civic San Diego focuses on redevelopment downtown and in certain other underdeveloped neighborhoods. The city “holds sole authority over appointment of the members of Civic San Diego’s board of directors” according to Denise Menard, a Civic spokesperson.
[box type=”shadow post-form”]
Oops! We could not locate your form.
[/box]
Civic’s unique arrangement
Public-private partnerships like these are a way for the city to create public spaces by negotiating agreements with private developers who, in most cases, take on some of the project’s costs.
inewsource filed a California Public Records Act request with the city and Civic, which showed the Fault Line Park improvements contract is one of five public-private partnerships negotiated by the agency or its predecessor since 2000. The response included contracts for Horton Plaza, the Omni Hotel, The Children’s Museum and the Little Italy Piazza.
In the other four contracts, Civic sold or leased public land to companies that agreed to develop and maintain a public space — at their own expense — often in return for entitlements beyond what their zoning limits allow, Baxamusa said.
Pinnacle Bayside Development agreed to pay $5 million to Civic San Diego for land next to its Pinnacle on the Park apartments so it could build the restaurant and underground parking. Civic said it agreed to pay that same amount to Pinnacle to cover the cost of designing, constructing and maintaining Fault Line Park and two public restrooms.
The map of the sales parcel purchased by Pinnacle Bayside Development. The black space on the top left corner represents the restaurant and stripes represent the park. Courtesy of Civic San Diego.
In this unique deal, $1.6 million of the $5 million to Pinnacle was for restroom and park maintenance.
inewsource reviewed all of Civic’s public-private partnerships provided through the PRA, and interviewed officials at the city Park and Recreation Department and Civic San Diego. Civic officials said because every agreement is different, there is no uniform policy for monitoring maintenance.
One year after the project opened, responsibility over enforcement of Pinnacle’s obligations is anything but clear.
The consulting agreement between the city of San Diego and Civic says the agency is responsible for enforcing developer obligations, however Civic’s vice president of neighborhood investment, Kristine Zortman, said they have no mechanism to enforce.
Prior to an in-person interview with Civic staff on Sept. 30, Zortman told inewsource Civic’s role in this park project is to monitor the developer’s compliance. If problems were found, Civic would then notify the city and work with its staff to enforce the developer’s obligations.
At the interview, Civic vice president of planning Brad Richter acknowledged the park maintenance is the developer’s obligation, but said the city Park and Recreation Department is responsible for overseeing the maintenance of the park and Civic only has a “vested interest” in the project.
“We essentially work to negotiate agreements to benefit and reactivate areas in downtown and other underserved communities,” Zortman said, describing the nonprofit as an “asset manager.”
She said city funds used to pay for projects like Fault Line Park were leftover assets transferred to Civic San Diego after the dissolution of the city’s predecessor redevelopment agency.
Pinnacle’s headquarters in Vancouver, Canada, directed inewsource to San Diego development manager Dennis La Salle for comment, but he refused to answer questions about the contract over the phone and did not respond to emails.
Baxamusa said the role Civic plays in negotiating contracts makes it too easy for problems to go unsolved.
“It’s so simple, if you have a problem with a public restroom, you go to your elected official, make some noise and they’ll fix it. That’s how it’s supposed to work in a democracy,” Baxamusa said. “It’s not supposed to be some obscure entity that is unaccountable to the public that makes a deal with the developer and gives them a break when they want.”
Public restrooms and the homeless
Data reported by the Downtown San Diego Partnership in August shows the homeless population count in East Village is more than 800 people.
Currently there are four public restrooms in East Village, including the Portland Loo at Park Boulevard and Market Street, restrooms at the Neil Good Day Center, at St. Vincent de Paul Village, and when Petco Park is open, restrooms at the Park at the Park.
Robert Weichelt of the Downtown Planning Council said the restroom situation at the Pinnacle building confirmed many of the East Village residents’ fears prior to the park’s opening.
“It was a shame because everybody talked about how they were going to say ‘you watch, it’ll turn into a homeless camp.’ So many of us don’t want that to happen,” Weichelt said.
Patricia Botello, who regularly walks her dog at Fault Line Park, said she has submitted numerous complaints to the city about the safety and upkeep of the park.
Patricia Botello, a resident of East Village, speaks to a security guard at Fault Line Park. She said too often she sees homeless people drinking alcohol, doing drugs and using the park itself as a bathroom. Megan Wood, inewsource. Oct. 5, 2016.
“I want this park to be beautiful and to be used by the community,” Botello said. “Nobody is paying attention, not the management of this building, not clean and safe, not the police department, not the city council and not the mayor.”
She said one security guard patrolling the entire park is not enough because the homeless have made the central grassy area and children’s playground a place to conduct illegal activities and sleep at night.
Tim Graham, a spokesman for the city Park and Recreation Department, said they meet with the developer and Civic once a month to discuss the ongoing issues at Fault Line Park, but it is unknown when the restrooms will reopen.
inewsource is a nonprofit, nonpartisan newsroom dedicated to improving lives in the San Diego region and beyond through impactful, data-based investigative and accountability journalism.
Our Vision
Betrayals of the public trust are revealed and rectified, wrongdoing is deterred, and inequities are illuminated thanks to inewsource’s deep, dogged, fact-based reporting.
Our Values
Truth: Above all else, we value the importance of a free and credible press. Truth is the cornerstone of democracy and the core value for inewsource.
Transparency: We build trust with our readers by adhering to the highest standards and ethics, and to reporting with facts, precision and context.
Collaboration: Our newsroom prioritizes collaboration over competition. We regularly partner with media outlets on reporting projects and to share content.
Community: Our reporting serves the San Diego region, and we strive to build relationships with our audience by getting out into the community to listen and engage.
Ethics Policy
inewsource will conduct its business with the highest standards of decency, fairness and accuracy. These standards shall apply equally to inewsource employees, freelancers and all others engaged in gathering information on behalf of inewsource. All receive a copy of these ethical standards.
In the course of our reporting, we will consistently:
● Identify our organization and ourselves fully and avoid false representations of any kind to any source.
● Obtain consent from all parties before electronically recording any interview or conversation except in extraordinary cases authorized by the Managing Editor and Editor. If a source refuses to be taped, that must be honored; no recordings are to be made without consent.
● Respect the individual’s right to privacy. inewsource will never manipulate or barter private, personal, health, financial or other extraneous information in the course of preparing its reports.
● Any source we describe or write about in any significant manner must be contacted. The employee should document all efforts to contact the source, and if unsuccessful, should summarize these efforts at contact in the body of his/her writing.
In addition, inewsource follows the Code of Ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists. The latest version, revised in 2014, can be found here.
Our organization retains full authority over editorial content to protect the best journalistic and business interests of our organization. We will maintain a firewall between news coverage decisions and sources of all revenue. Acceptance of financial support does not constitute implied or actual endorsement of donors or their products, services or opinions.
We accept gifts, grants and sponsorships from individuals and organizations for the general support of our activities, but our news judgments are made independently and not on the basis of donor support. Our organization also may consider donations to support the coverage of particular topics, but our organization maintains editorial control of the coverage. We will cede no right of review or influence of editorial content, nor of unauthorized distribution of editorial content.
Our organization will make public all donors who give a total of $1,000 or more. We will accept anonymous donations for general support only if it is clear that sufficient safeguards have been put into place that the expenditure of that donation is made independently by our organization and in compliance with INN’s Membership Standards.
Diversity
Diverse Voices
Inclusiveness is at the heart of thinking and acting as journalists, and it supports the educational mandate of inewsource. Race, class, generation, gender, sexual orientation, ability, and geography all affect point of view. inewsource believes that reflecting societal differences in reporting leads to better, more nuanced stories and a better-informed community.
inewsource is committed to employment equity and diversity.
Diverse Staffing Report
Below is a breakdown of staffing data at inewsource. We determine the composition of our staff by asking them to self-identify. It is based on a newsroom of 11 and a total staff of 15 as of August 2020. Percentages are based on 15 total survey responses. The numbers include full-time and part-time staff, full-time fellows and full-time and part-time interns.
All Staff Percentages are based on 15 total survey responses. The numbers include full-time and part-time staff, full-time fellows and full-time and part-time interns.
Newsroom Percentages are based on 15 completed survey responses to this question.
Business Percentages are based on 15 completed survey responses to this question.
Gender Identity
Gender Identity
Gender Identity
Women
80%
Women
82%
Women
75%
Men
20%
Men
18%
Men
25%
Sexual Orientation
Sexual Orientation
Sexual Orientation
Straight
87%
Straight
82%
Straight
100%
LGBTQ-identifying
7%
LGBTQ-identifying
7%
Not specified
7%
Not specified
7%
Speak a language beyond English at home
33%
Speak a language beyond English at home
18%
Speak a language beyond English at home
75%
Race/Ethnicity
Race/Ethnicity
Race/Ethnicity
White
67%
White
73%
White
50%
Hispanic or Latinx
20%
Two or more races
18%
Hispanic or Latinx
50%
Two or more races
13%
Hispanic or Latinx
9%
Age
Age
Age
20-29
40%
20-29
45%
20-29
25%
30-39
47%
30-39
45%
30-39
50%
60 or older
13%
60 or older
9%
60 or older
25%
* The percentages in the charts have been rounded and may not add up to 100.
Ownership Structure, Funding and Grants
inewsource is a nonprofit organization, whose legal name is Investigative Newsource. It does business as inewsource. The business was incorporated on Aug. 4, 2009 in the state of California. Tax-exempt status as a 501c3 was granted by the IRS on Sept. 15, 2010. inewsource is funded primarily by individual contributions and foundation grants. We are guided by a board of directors.
Editorial independence: Journalists employed by inewsource take no editorial direction from donors whose contributions may support the organization. inewsource will not hesitate to report on its donors when events warrant. Our Editorial Independence Policy details the firewall between journalism and revenue.
To be transparent with the public, inewsourcelists its donors on its website. In cases where a donor is the subject of an inewsource story, additional disclosure will be made.
Financial Documents
We do our due diligence to earn your trust in our reporting, as well as in our governance and financial sustainability. All of our financial documents are made available to view so that our supporters can trust we are sound stewards of your philanthropy. Review our IRS Form 990s, audited financial statements and annual reports:
Transparency is one of our core values. Today, there is a need to build trust with our audience because new media and ways of communicating spread lies and slanted news faster than “real” news. At the same time, this era of new technologies makes it easier than ever for news organizations to be transparent. People don’t just have to believe us, they can investigate our investigations with our source materials.
Transparency is key to building credibility.
inewsource reporters have primary responsibility for reporting, writing, and fact-checking their stories. But before a story is published, the reporter reviews all facts and sources with an editor or another reporter. Facts must be traced to a primary source.
In addition, we “transparify” certain investigative stories. This process involves publishing a version of the web story with hyperlinks to all the story’s facts. This is proof that all facts have been documented with primary evidence. We do this to build trust with our readers and to be as transparent as we hope the public figures and institutions that we hold accountable will be.
Unnamed Sources
Not all sources are created equal. Some sources cannot speak authoritatively, provide proper analysis or speak specifically to every inquiry placed before them. To maintain the integrity of our reporting, inewsource reporters must select sources who can speak with validity to the topic at hand, and avoid presenting unqualified or underqualified sources as experts.
If an interviewed source has a conflict of interest, or whose qualifications may be tangential or limited, reporters will note that within the context of the story.
It is incumbent upon reporters to fully background their sources to uncover conflicts of interest or slant prior to using them in a story.
Unless discussed prior to an interview, all subjects talking to inewsource journalists are on the record. Specifically, the source is identified by name and title, and their exact or paraphrased words are attributed to them for publication. If journalists speak with sources who are not politicians, public figures or those not commonly interviewed by journalists, staff should explain clearly that information discussed will be on the record and for publication.
There are times, however, when information may be critical for a story but cannot be found or verified by other means. For example, a source may be able to confirm specific information about a series of events they may have witnessed, but have legitimate concerns about using their name or title. The repercussions to the source could be legal, job-related retribution or personal safety. The source and journalist must discuss these potential dangers and terms of use should be agreed upon by both parties.
If inewsource publishes information from an anonymous source, inewsource will explain to readers, in as much detail as possible, why we agreed to anonymity.
Corrections and Clarifications
inewsource strives for accuracy in everything we do, which is why we are committed to fact checking our content. But sometimes we make errors. When that happens, we correct them. We also clarify stories when something we’ve written is confusing or could be misinterpreted.
We endeavor to always be transparent about our commitment to correcting errors and clarifying misperceptions. When staffers see, hear or read about a possible issue with the accuracy of any inewsource content, they are expected to bring it to the attention of an editor and the web producer so it can be evaluated to determine how to proceed.
Including the web producer is key because inewsource is a multimedia news organization and shares its content with multiple partners on multiple platforms. The web producer must alert these partners about corrections and clarifications.
Corrections and clarifications should be included at the bottom of stories and dated.
Actionable Feedback and Newsroom Contacts
Our audiences know the region we cover and have a stake in maintaining and improving the quality of life in San Diego and Imperial counties. We know your knowledge and insights can help shape what we cover and how we cover it. We invite your comments and complaints on news stories, suggestions for issues to cover or sources to consult. We rely on you to tell us when we get it right and when we need to keep pushing.
Your comments, questions and suggestions can be sent to the team as a whole at contact@inewsource.org or you can contact a specific member of our staff.
Lorie Hearn is the chief executive officer, editor and founder of inewsource. She founded inewsource in the summer of 2009, following a successful reporting and editing career in newspapers. She retired from The San Diego Union-Tribune, where she had been a reporter, Metro Editor and finally the senior editor for Metro and Watchdog Journalism. In addition to department oversight, Hearn personally managed a four-person watchdog team, composed of two data specialists and two investigative reporters. Hearn was a Nieman Foundation fellow at Harvard University in 1994-95. She focused on juvenile justice and drug control policy, a natural course to follow her years as a courts and legal affairs reporter at the San Diego Union and then the Union-Tribune.
Hearn became Metro Editor in 1999 and oversaw regional and city news coverage, which included the city of San Diego’s financial debacle and near bankruptcy. Reporters and editors on Metro during her tenure were part of the Pulitzer Prize-winning stories that exposed Congressman Randy “Duke” Cunningham and led to his imprisonment.
Hearn began her journalism career as a reporter for the Bucks County Courier Times, a small daily outside of Philadelphia, shortly after graduating from the University of Delaware. During the decades following, she moved through countless beats at five newspapers on both coasts.
High-profile coverage included the historic state Supreme Court election in 1986, when three sitting justices were ousted from the bench, and the 1992 execution of Robert Alton Harris. That gas chamber execution was the first time the death penalty was carried out in California in 25 years.
In her nine years as Metro Editor at the Union-Tribune, Hearn made watchdog reporting a priority. Her reporters produced award-winning investigations covering large and small local governments. The depth and breadth of their public service work was most evident in coverage of the wildfires of 2003 and then 2007, when more than half a million people were evacuated from their homes.
Laura Wingard is the managing editor at inewsource. She has been an editor in San Diego since 2002, working at The San Diego Union-Tribune, KPBS and now inewsource. At the Union-Tribune, she served in a variety of roles including as enterprise editor, government editor, public safety and legal affairs editor, and metro editor. She directed the newspaper’s award-winning coverage of the October 2007 wildfires and the 2010 disappearance of Poway teenager Chelsea King. She also oversaw reporting on San Diego’s pension crisis.
For two years, Wingard was news and digital editor at KPBS, overseeing a team of four multimedia reporters and two web producers. She also was the KPBS liaison with inewsource and collaborated with inewsource chief executive officer and editor Lorie Hearn on investigative work by both news organizations.
Wingard also worked at the Las Vegas Review-Journal as the city editor and as an award-winning reporter covering the environment and politics. She also was the assistant managing editor for metro at The Press-Enterprise in Riverside. She earned her bachelor’s degree at California State University, Fullerton, with a double major in communications/journalism and political science.
Brad Racino is the assistant editor and a senior reporter at inewsource. He has produced investigations for print, radio and TV on topics including political corruption, transportation, health, maritime, education and nonprofits.
His cross-platform reporting for inewsource has earned more than 50 awards since 2012, including back-to-back national medals from Investigative Reporters and Editors, two national Edward R. Murrow awards, a Meyer “Mike” Berger award from New York City’s Columbia Journalism School, the Sol Price Award for Responsible Journalism, San Diego SPJ’s First Amendment Award, and a national Emmy nomination.
In 2017, Racino was selected by the Institute for Nonprofit News as one of 10 “Emerging Leaders” in U.S. nonprofit journalism.
Racino has worked as a reporter and database analyst for News21; as a photographer, videographer and reporter for the Columbia Missourian; as a project coordinator for the National Freedom of Information Coalition and as a videographer and editor for Verizon Fios1 TV in New York. He received his master’s degree in journalism from the University of Missouri in 2012.
Byline Policy
Most of our articles carry a byline to identify the author. In some cases, inewsource will use a brand byline such as “Staff” or “inewsource” for internal or editorial information about the newsroom. In these instances, inewsource‘s Editor and Managing Editor are responsible for content that uses a brand byline.
The Trust Project
inewsource is proud to be a member of The Trust Project and support efforts to increase transparency in journalism by displaying the 8 Trust Indicators on our stories. We launched the Trust Indicators on Sep. 16, 2020.
Privacy Policy
inewsource has prepared this Privacy Policy to explain how we collect, use, protect, and share information when you use our inewsource.org website (the “Site“) or when you use any of our services (the “Services“).
By using the Site or Services you consent to this Privacy Policy.
Log Data
Like many site operators, we collect information that your browser sends whenever you visit our site (“Log Data”).
This Log Data may include information such as your computer’s Internet Protocol (“IP”) address, browser type, browser version, the pages of our site that you visit, the time and date of your visit, the time spent on those pages and other statistics.
Cookies
Cookies are files with small amount of data, which may include an anonymous unique identifier. Cookies are sent to your browser from a web site and stored on your computer or mobile device.
Like many sites, we use “cookies” to collect information. You can instruct your browser to refuse all cookies or to indicate when a cookie is being sent. However, if you do not accept cookies, you may not be able to use some portions of our site.
Certain pages on our site may set other third party cookies. For example, we may embed content, such as videos, from another site that sets a cookie. While we try to minimize these third party cookies, we can’t always control what cookies this third party content sets.
Additionally, we may use third party services — such as those that provide social media conveniences, measure traffic, send newsletters and facilitate donations — that may place cookies on your computer. We don’t have any way of knowing how such services handle the resulting data internally. inewsource makes no claim, nor takes liability for the insecure submission of information via these applications.
Here are the services whose cookies you can find on inewsource.org:
Sharing buttons for Facebook and Twitter. These use the standard scripts provided by each company.
Google Analytics, which we use to measure site traffic. Google Analytics gathers certain non-personally identifying information over time, such as your IP address, browser type, internet service provider, referring and exit pages, time stamp, and similar data. We also use Facebook Pixel to measure, optimize and build audiences for advertising campaigns served on Facebook. In particular it enables us to see how our users move between devices when accessing our website and Facebook, to ensure that our Facebook advertising is seen by our users most likely to be interested in such advertising by analyzing which content a user has viewed and interacted with on our website.
Stripe, which allows us to accept donations through our website.
Salesforce to manage newsletter subscriber, donor, and other identifiable user data.
Mailchimp, to manage newsletter distributions. We collect your email address if you choose to subscribe to one of our email newsletters or email news alerts. Other optional information that you enter when subscribing – such as your first and last names or city are simply so that we can deliver more personalized email newsletters. We DO NOT sell, rent or market your information to any other parties. We retain your information only as long as necessary to provide your service. When we send emails, it collects some data about which users open the emails and which links are clicked. We use this information to optimize our email newsletters and, as aggregate information, to explain what percentage of our users open and interact with our newsletters.
Personal Data
We only collect personally identifiable information such as your name and email address when you sign up for a newsletter, donate to our organization, or otherwise submit it to us voluntarily. We do not share your personal data with any third parties other than some common service providers, whose products use your information to help us improve our site, deliver newsletters, or allow us to offer donation opportunities.
inewsource limits access to all user data for the purposes of newsletter, fundraising, and customer service only. User data is not sold to or otherwise shared with anyone not working with or for the inewsource.
You may unsubscribe or opt-out of our email and mail communications at any time by hitting the “unsubscribe” button in any email you receive from inewsource, or by emailing us at contact@inewsource.org or calling us at 619-594-5100.
Donor Information
The identities of all donors will be listed on our website. inewsource does not share, trade, sell, or otherwise release donors’ personal information to any third parties.
Refunds
If you encounter errors when donating on the website, please contact us at members@inewsource.org. For example, if you submit a donation for an incorrect amount or make a duplicate transaction please email us immediately so we can reverse the charges.
Cancellation of Recurring Donations
You can cancel your monthly recurring donations free of charge by notifying us at members@inewsource.org.
Links to Other Websites
Our site may contain links to documents, resources or other websites that we think may be of interest to you. We have no control over these other sites or their content. You should be aware when you leave our site for another, and remember that other sites are governed by their own user agreements and privacy policies, which should be available to you to read.
Disclaimers and Limitation of Liability
Although we take reasonable steps to prevent the introduction of viruses, worms, “Trojan Horses” or other destructive materials to our site, we do not guarantee or warrant that our site or materials that may be downloaded from our site are free from such destructive features. We are not liable for any damages or harm attributable to such features. We are not liable for any claim, loss or injust based on errors, omissions, interruptions or other inaccuracies on our site, nor for any claim, loss or injust that results from your use of this site or your breach of any provision of this User Agreement.
Contact Us
If there are any questions regarding this privacy policy, please contact us at contact@inewsource.org or call us at 619-594-5100.
Megan Wood was a multimedia journalist for inewsource. To contact inewsource with questions, tips or corrections, email contact@inewsource.org.
More by Megan Wood
6 replies on “Why are San Diegans paying $1.6 million for closed restrooms?”
I first shared the details about this absurd waste of taxpayers money with Inewsource a few months ago. Good to see you have researched what’s going on. I appreciate your investigation.
It’s time for taxpayers to ask: Now what? Bathrooms are a basic necessity. Private business should not have the right to arbitrarily close them because they require maintenance.
This is really outrageous. It’s been widely reported that there are not nearly enough bathrooms downtown for the demand of East Village residents, homeless families, visitors and others. Yet these public restrooms have been closed for months- while taxpayers foot the bill for a dirty park.
And while I’d like to believe Public/Private partnerships can work, I learned as a legislator that such agreements will only serve taxpayers if public agencies have the ability and wherewithal to actually ENFORCE their contracts on behalf of residents, taxpayers and constituents.
So- why isn’t Civic San Diego taking steps to hold the private interests accountable? Why won’t they even discuss the terms of the agreements? And why did it take a complaint from someone who visited this area, and tried to use the restrooms, to bring it to their attention?
Willful ignorance and turning a blind eye to wasted development funds is horrible policy.
With more of these “PPPs” in the works- how can we count on them to work as promised?
If Civic San Diego won’t responsibly manage taxpayer’s dollars and make sure developers keep their word- who will?
MUSTARD & KETCHUP BUILDINGS YUUUCCCCCKKKK
Can we start by repainting the buildings??
#thereshouldbealaw
Looks like we need restrooms more then buildings.
There are public restrooms at several places around downtown where homeless people live that are just fine 95% of the time. Waterfront park. Ruocco Park. The new Horton Plaza park. These places all seem to make it work. Are the restrooms sometimes a little gross? Well yes, they are public restrooms. Have there been occasions when I was really really glad they are there? YES.
Megan- I have been told that the employees of Stella Public (?) house will open these restrooms for disabled customers upon request.
This brings up potential ADA violations by the developer and the city: if these restrooms are the only ones accessible by people with disabilities, when they come to use the park, and they are not kept open – as their contract required- are they exposing taxpayers to an ADA lawsuit, such as the one at Qualcomm stadium that dragged on for years?
If so: That means taxpayers may have to pay legal costs for a claim that the restrooms are not being managed as agreed to, and providing disabled access. This could put the city in additional legal jeopardy.
Can someone ask Civic San Diego about that issue?
Everybody is focused on the symptoms that are the byproduct of the irresponsible population and not the acts of those people who leech off of society.
The “problem” are those who chose to live outside the boundaries of civilization. Adddress them and you will solve your problem.
I first shared the details about this absurd waste of taxpayers money with Inewsource a few months ago. Good to see you have researched what’s going on. I appreciate your investigation.
It’s time for taxpayers to ask: Now what? Bathrooms are a basic necessity. Private business should not have the right to arbitrarily close them because they require maintenance.
This is really outrageous. It’s been widely reported that there are not nearly enough bathrooms downtown for the demand of East Village residents, homeless families, visitors and others. Yet these public restrooms have been closed for months- while taxpayers foot the bill for a dirty park.
And while I’d like to believe Public/Private partnerships can work, I learned as a legislator that such agreements will only serve taxpayers if public agencies have the ability and wherewithal to actually ENFORCE their contracts on behalf of residents, taxpayers and constituents.
So- why isn’t Civic San Diego taking steps to hold the private interests accountable? Why won’t they even discuss the terms of the agreements? And why did it take a complaint from someone who visited this area, and tried to use the restrooms, to bring it to their attention?
Willful ignorance and turning a blind eye to wasted development funds is horrible policy.
With more of these “PPPs” in the works- how can we count on them to work as promised?
If Civic San Diego won’t responsibly manage taxpayer’s dollars and make sure developers keep their word- who will?
MUSTARD & KETCHUP BUILDINGS YUUUCCCCCKKKK
Can we start by repainting the buildings??
#thereshouldbealaw
Looks like we need restrooms more then buildings.
There are public restrooms at several places around downtown where homeless people live that are just fine 95% of the time. Waterfront park. Ruocco Park. The new Horton Plaza park. These places all seem to make it work. Are the restrooms sometimes a little gross? Well yes, they are public restrooms. Have there been occasions when I was really really glad they are there? YES.
Megan- I have been told that the employees of Stella Public (?) house will open these restrooms for disabled customers upon request.
This brings up potential ADA violations by the developer and the city: if these restrooms are the only ones accessible by people with disabilities, when they come to use the park, and they are not kept open – as their contract required- are they exposing taxpayers to an ADA lawsuit, such as the one at Qualcomm stadium that dragged on for years?
If so: That means taxpayers may have to pay legal costs for a claim that the restrooms are not being managed as agreed to, and providing disabled access. This could put the city in additional legal jeopardy.
Can someone ask Civic San Diego about that issue?
Everybody is focused on the symptoms that are the byproduct of the irresponsible population and not the acts of those people who leech off of society.
The “problem” are those who chose to live outside the boundaries of civilization. Adddress them and you will solve your problem.